Abstract The question of fluctuations in electromagnetic radiation played an important part during the first period of the development of quantum theory. After having introduced (Einstein 1905) the conception of light quanta or photons in order to explain the observed phenomena of the photoelectric effect, Einstein (1909) considered the consequences of this idea for other properties of the radiation. Planck’s formula for the energy density of radiation implies, by arguments of general thermodynamics and statistics, the following expression for the mean square fluctuation of the energy contained in a volume v in terms of the mean energy Ēv.
Abstract The question of fluctuations in electromagnetic radiation played an important part during the first period of the development of quantum theory. After having introduced (Einstein 1905) the conception of light quanta or photons in order to explain the observed phenomena of the photoelectric effect, Einstein (1909) considered the consequences of this idea for other properties of the radiation. Planck’s formula for the energy density of radiation implies, by arguments of general thermodynamics and statistics, the following expression for the mean square fluctuation of the energy contained in a volume v in terms of the mean energy Ēv.
Abstract Einstein’s statistical-thermodynamic calculations of the random variations of the radiation density constitute the ground upon which the light quantum hypothesis was originally based. According to these calculations such a variation of the radiation energy prevails—superposed above the fluctuations caused by the interferences calculated according to the classical theory—as if the radiation consisted of mutually independently mobile quanta hv of energy. According to Einstein, Maxwell’s theory correctly renders mean time values, which alone have been directly observable, as proved by the complete agreement between theory and experiment in optics; but Maxwell’s theory leads to laws respecting the thermic properties of radiation which are incompatible with the entropy-probability relation. After the wave-mechanical theory of de Broglie and Schrödinger had been generally accepted, the idea concerning the statistical character of the wave-field—already presented by Einstein in 1905—has, of course, been taken up again by Born in a more general way. As is well known, Bohr and Heisenberg have tried to conquer the difficulties to which the radiation theory has led by a radical change in our conception of energy.
Abstract With the failure of classical physics to explain the experimentally observed black body radiation spectrum, the photoelectric effect and the existence of narrow spectral lines in the light emitted by excited atoms, physicists were forced to reach out for new ideas. Following Planck’s initial “drastic hypothesis” of light “quanta”, Einstein led the way in exploring some of the myriad implications of this idea. In particular, the study of fluctuations led to a new understanding of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with atoms. Einstein invented the photon by showing, through fluctuation studies, that light emitted by atoms must be in the form of plane waves. These ideas led to the first notions regarding the quantization of matter and its dynamics.
The idea of the photon has stirred the imaginations of physicists ever since 1905 when Einstein originally proposed the use of light quanta to explain the photoelectric effect. This concept is formalized in the quantum theory of radiation, which has had unfailing success in explaining the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter, seemingly limited only by the ability of physicists to perform the indicated calculations. Nevertheless, it has its conceptual problems—various infinities and frequent misinterpretations. Consequently an increasing number of workers are asking, “to what extent is the quantized field really necessary and useful?” In fact the experimental results of the photoelectric effect were explained by G. Wentzel in 1927 without the quantum theory of radiation. Similarly most electro-optic phenomena such as stimulated emission, reaction of the emitted field on the emitting atom, resonance fluorescence, and so on, do not require the quantization of the field for their explanation. As we will see, these processes can all be quantitatively explained and physically understood in terms of the semiclassical theory of the matter–field interaction in which the electric field is treated classically while the atoms obey the laws of quantum mechanics. The quantized field is fundamentally required for accurate descriptions of certain processes involving fluctuations in the electromagnetic field: for example, spontaneous emission, the Lamb shift, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and certain aspects of blackbody radiation. (The Compton effect also fits here, but see later under references 8b and c.) Here we will outline how the photon concept originated and developed, where it is not required and is often misused, and finally where it plays an essential role in the understanding of physical phenomena. In our discussion we will attempt to give a logically consistent definition of the word “photon”—a statement far more necessary than one might think, for so many contradictory uses exist of this elusive beast. In particular consider the original coining of the word by G. N. Lewis: “[because it appears to spend] only a minute fraction of its existence as a carrier of radiant energy, while the rest of the time it remains an important structural element within the atom…, I therefore take the liberty of proposing for this hypothetical new atom which is not light but plays an essential part in every process of radiation, the name photon!” (our exclamation point). Clearly the present usage of the word is very different.
This chapter discusses electromagnetic waves and photons. It begins by reviewing some basic ideas on the properties of waves, introducing the wave properties of radiation. There are several reasons for starting with a discussion of electromagnetic radiation. Historically, it was in this area that the quantum theory first developed. The applications of the light-quantum hypothesis, as it was first called, also provide key pieces of evidence for the quantization of energy in atoms and molecules. The chapter then looks at the evidence for the wave nature of light and of X-rays, before putting these two forms of radiation into the context of electromagnetic radiation in general. It also considers Albert Einstein's analysis of the photoelectric effect. Finally, the chapter assesses the statistical nature of photons.
Classical electromagnetics in free space leaves no room for accommodation of a light particle. To underline this, it is sufficient to remember that Einstein in order to reach his lightquantum (energy-quantum) hypothesis had to mix classical theoretical physics with a piece of experimental information that defies description in classical terms. In his 1905-paper Einstein concluded [60]:Monochromatic radiation of low density (within the range of validity of Wien’s radiation formula) behaves thermodynamically as though it consisted of a number of mutually independent energy quanta of magnitude hν. The introduction of light quanta in the Wien regime (the high-frequency part of the Planck blackbody radiation law) is the first step toward the concept of electromagnetic radiation as a Bose gas of photons [180, 39, 68, 69]. Although a photon gas obeys Bose-Einstein statistics for all frequencies the statistical independence assumed by Einstein in 1905 is not true in general. Einstein used Boltzmann statistics when he conjectured the existence of light quanta. In the Wien regime Boltzmann and Bose-Einstein statistics lead to the same conclusion since the mean number of particles (photons) with a given energy is much less than one. The circumstance that the light quanta are not statistically independent in Bose-Einstein counting finds its explanation in quantum mechanics. Hence, the statistical correlation is induced by the requirement of totally symmetric wave functions.
Planck’s 1900 introduction of the “energy elements”, i.e., electromagnetic radiation quanta of energy hν each, for founding his radiation law marks the origin of quantum theory and is discussed in all courses on this subject. Surprisingly, the question whether Planck really implied quantisation is debated among historians of physics. We present a simplified account of that debate which also sheds light on the issue of indistinguishability and Einstein’s light quantum hypothesis. Here, the relevance of the notion ‘(in)distinguishability’ is often overemphasized. It has to be treated together with ‘equality’, ‘identity’, and ‘interchangeability’, where the latter one is the decisive notion in this context. As a result, the difference between Planck’s and Einstein’s concepts of ‘light particles’ becomes more easily to grasp. For that and many other reasons, we believe that the teaching of quantum physics benefits from including the material presented here, and that beyond the demand of historical completeness. Nevertheless, for the sake of our readers’ convenience, we almost completely reprint Planck’s former students Hettner’s remembering of Planck’s way to his radiation law, together with its translation into English. It seems that Planck has not really done the calculations described in his December 1900 lecture. For this, following Becker, we show how to overcome the difficulties over there, and we sketch his simplifying approach in his subsequent 1901 article. Strangely enough, in his 1906/07 lectures on the theory of heat radiation, Planck deviates from those calculations and obtains a non-extensive entropy. This, too, is most easily analyzed using Bach’s three-level scheme ‘configuration. occupation. occupancy’ for the counting combinatorics involved. Boltzmann’s 1877, Planck’s 1900, Einstein’s 1905, Bose’s 1924, and other treatments are systematized using that scheme