Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics

Nonclassical Nature of Nonlocal Dispersion Cancellation

J. D. Franson

Published Jan 1, 2010• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Shapiro recently suggested that nonlocal dispersion cancellation is essentially classical in nature. It is shown that his classical model gives identical dispersion in two beams of light and is not analogous to nonlocal dispersion cancellation.
DOI
10.1364/qels.2010.qthn5

Related papers

Lack of dispersion cancellation with classical phase-sensitive light

J. D. Franson

Shapiro recently argued that nonlocal dispersion cancellation using entangled pairs of photons is essentially classical in nature, based on a comparison with a classical model in which two stationary, chaotic beams of light have phases and frequencies that are anticorrelated, which he refers to as ``phase-sensitive'' light [J. H. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 81, 023824 (2010)]. It is shown here that there is no physical cancellation of dispersion for classical light of that kind and Shapiro's results merely reflect the fact that identical dispersion occurs in both beams. The origin of the cross correlations between the intensities of the two beams is shown to be completely different in the classical and quantum mechanical cases.

arXiv:0909.2846•Physical Review A•Feb 23, 2010•12 citations

Nonclassical nature of dispersion cancellation and nonlocal interferometry

J. D. Franson

Several recent papers have shown that some forms of dispersion cancellation have classical analogs and that some aspects of nonlocal two-photon interferometry are consistent with local realistic models. It is noted here that the classical analogs only apply to local dispersion cancellation experiments [A. M. Steinberg, P. G. Kwiat, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2421 (1992)] and that nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is inconsistent with any classical field theory and has no classical analog. The local models that have been suggested for two-photon interferometry are shown to be local but not realistic if the spatial extent of the interferometers is taken into account. It is the inability of classical models to describe all of the relevant aspects of these experiments that distinguishes between quantum and classical physics, which is also the case in Bell's inequality.

arXiv:0907.5196•Physical Review A•Sep 28, 2009•42 citations

Dispersion cancellation in optical measurement and its classical analogy

Shaobo Gao, Wei-Tao Liu, Ping Liu +2 more

Dispersion cancellation was proposed to enhance the robustness against dispersion broadening in optical measurement device. Nonlocal dispersion cancellation is suggested to be a pure quantum effect. We propose a novel classical analogy of nonlocal dispersion cancellation, which use frequency anti-correlation to reduce the dispersion broadening to a large extent. The optimized condition is given and analyzed by comparing with quantum light source.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Oct 19, 2016•0 citations

Dispersion cancellation with phase-sensitive Gaussian-state light

Jeffrey H. Shapiro

Franson's paradigm for nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is studied using two kinds of jointly Gaussian-state signal and reference beams with phase-sensitive cross correlations. The first joint signal-reference state is nonclassical, with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the ultimate quantum-mechanical limit. It models the outputs obtained from continuous-wave spontaneous parametric down-conversion. The second joint signal-reference state is classical---it has a proper $P$ representation---with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the limit set by classical physics. Using these states we show that a version of Franson's nonlocal dispersion cancellation configuration has essentially identical quantum and classical explanations except for the contrast obtained, which is much higher in the quantum case than it is in the classical case. This work bears on Franson's recent article [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032119 (2009)], which asserts that there is no classical explanation for all the features seen in quantum nonlocal dispersion cancellation.

arXiv:0909.2514•Physical Review A•Feb 23, 2010•21 citations

Nonlocal cancellation of dispersion

J. D. Franson

Classically, two coincident light pulses propagating through two dispersive media will become broadened and their degree of coincidence will be reduced. When entangled photon pairs from parametric down-conversion are considered instead, it is found that the dispersion experienced by one photon can exactly cancel the dispersion experienced by the other in such a way that their coincidence is maintained. The dispersion cancellation is independent of the separation between the two photons and provides a further example of the nonlocal nature of the quantum theory.

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1992•291 citations

Dispersion cancellation with phase-sensitive Gaussian-state light

Jeffrey H. Shapiro

Franson’s paradigm for nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is studied using two kinds of jointly Gaussian-state signal and reference beams with phase-sensitive cross correlations. The first joint signal-reference state is nonclassical, with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the ultimate quantum-mechanical limit. It models the outputs obtained from continuous-wave spontaneous parametric down-conversion. The second joint signal-reference state is classical—it has a proper P representation—with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the limit set by classical physics. Using these states we show that a version of Franson’s nonlocal dispersion cancellation configuration has essentially identical quantum and classical explanations except for the contrast obtained, which is much higher in the quantum case than it is in the classical case. This work bears on Franson’s recent article [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032119 (2009)], which asserts that there is no classical explanation for all the features seen in quantum nonlocal dispersion cancellation.

APS•Feb 1, 2010•0 citations
Shapiro recently argued that nonlocal dispersion cancellation using entangled pairs of photons is essentially classical in nature, based on a comparison with a classical model in which two stationary, chaotic beams of light have phases and frequencies that are anticorrelated, which he refers to as ``phase-sensitive'' light [J. H. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 81, 023824 (2010)]. It is shown here that there is no physical cancellation of dispersion for classical light of that kind and Shapiro's results merely reflect the fact that identical dispersion occurs in both beams. The origin of the cross correlations between the intensities of the two beams is shown to be completely different in the classical and quantum mechanical cases.
Several recent papers have shown that some forms of dispersion cancellation have classical analogs and that some aspects of nonlocal two-photon interferometry are consistent with local realistic models. It is noted here that the classical analogs only apply to local dispersion cancellation experiments [A. M. Steinberg, P. G. Kwiat, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2421 (1992)] and that nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is inconsistent with any classical field theory and has no classical analog. The local models that have been suggested for two-photon interferometry are shown to be local but not realistic if the spatial extent of the interferometers is taken into account. It is the inability of classical models to describe all of the relevant aspects of these experiments that distinguishes between quantum and classical physics, which is also the case in Bell's inequality.
Franson's paradigm for nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is studied using two kinds of jointly Gaussian-state signal and reference beams with phase-sensitive cross correlations. The first joint signal-reference state is nonclassical, with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the ultimate quantum-mechanical limit. It models the outputs obtained from continuous-wave spontaneous parametric down-conversion. The second joint signal-reference state is classical---it has a proper PPP representation---with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the limit set by classical physics. Using these states we show that a version of Franson's nonlocal dispersion cancellation configuration has essentially identical quantum and classical explanations except for the contrast obtained, which is much higher in the quantum case than it is in the classical case. This work bears on Franson's recent article [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032119 (2009)], which asserts that there is no classical explanation for all the features seen in quantum nonlocal dispersion cancellation.
Classically, two coincident light pulses propagating through two dispersive media will become broadened and their degree of coincidence will be reduced. When entangled photon pairs from parametric down-conversion are considered instead, it is found that the dispersion experienced by one photon can exactly cancel the dispersion experienced by the other in such a way that their coincidence is maintained. The dispersion cancellation is independent of the separation between the two photons and provides a further example of the nonlocal nature of the quantum theory.
Franson’s paradigm for nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is studied using two kinds of jointly Gaussian-state signal and reference beams with phase-sensitive cross correlations. The first joint signal-reference state is nonclassical, with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the ultimate quantum-mechanical limit. It models the outputs obtained from continuous-wave spontaneous parametric down-conversion. The second joint signal-reference state is classical—it has a proper P representation—with a phase-sensitive cross correlation that is at the limit set by classical physics. Using these states we show that a version of Franson’s nonlocal dispersion cancellation configuration has essentially identical quantum and classical explanations except for the contrast obtained, which is much higher in the quantum case than it is in the classical case. This work bears on Franson’s recent article [J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032119 (2009)], which asserts that there is no classical explanation for all the features seen in quantum nonlocal dispersion cancellation.