Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Reply to “Lorentz and CPT invariances and the EPR correlations” by Costa de Beauregard

Antoine Suárez, Valerio Scarani

Published Dec 1, 1997• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(97)00829-3

Related papers

Lorentz and CPT invariances and the EPR correlations

O. Costa de Beauregard

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1997•5 citations

S-Matrix, Lorentz-and-CPT Invariance, and Einstein—Podolsky—Rosen Correlations

O. Costa de Beauregard

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

The EPR paradox, physical realism and Lorentz-invariance

Marie-Christine Combourieu

•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Reply to “ A critical analysis of N. Bohr's reply to the EPR argument”

Jes Madsen

Physics Letters A•May 1, 1981•1 citation

The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr’s Reply to EPR

Michael Dickson

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2002•10 citations

Disentangling the Quantum World

Huw Price, K. B. Wharton

Correlations related to quantum entanglement have convinced many physicists that there must be some at-a-distance connection between separated events, at the quantum level. In the late 1940s, however, O. Costa de Beauregard proposed that such correlations can be explained without action at a distance, so long as the influence takes a zigzag path, via the intersecting past lightcones of the events in question. Costa de Beauregard’s proposal is related to what has come to be called the retrocausal loophole in Bell’s Theorem, but—like that loophole—it receives little attention, and remains poorly understood. Here we propose a new way to explain and motivate the idea. We exploit some simple symmetries to show how Costa de Beauregard’s zigzag needs to work, to explain the correlations at the core of Bell’s Theorem. As a bonus, the explanation shows how entanglement might be a much simpler matter than the orthodox view assumes—not a puzzling feature of quantum reality itself, but an entirely unpuzzling feature of our knowledge of reality, once zigzags are in play.

arXiv:1508.01140•Entropy•Nov 16, 2015•89 citations
Correlations related to quantum entanglement have convinced many physicists that there must be some at-a-distance connection between separated events, at the quantum level. In the late 1940s, however, O. Costa de Beauregard proposed that such correlations can be explained without action at a distance, so long as the influence takes a zigzag path, via the intersecting past lightcones of the events in question. Costa de Beauregard’s proposal is related to what has come to be called the retrocausal loophole in Bell’s Theorem, but—like that loophole—it receives little attention, and remains poorly understood. Here we propose a new way to explain and motivate the idea. We exploit some simple symmetries to show how Costa de Beauregard’s zigzag needs to work, to explain the correlations at the core of Bell’s Theorem. As a bonus, the explanation shows how entanglement might be a much simpler matter than the orthodox view assumes—not a puzzling feature of quantum reality itself, but an entirely unpuzzling feature of our knowledge of reality, once zigzags are in play.