Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Modern Optics

SU(2) and SU(1,1) Rotation Transformation and Pseudo-vector Model in Quantum Optics

H.Q. Gong

Published Nov 1, 1992• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We construct a pseudo-vector model and realize the rotation transformation for the SU(2) and SU(1,1) dynamics. We introduce concepts of the pseudo-scalar and the scalar product in quantum optics. Several equivalents of the SU(2) and SU(1,1) unified rotation operator are given. By using this method, the two- and three-level Jaynes-Cummings model is discussed in the non-rotating wave approximation.

DOI
10.1080/09500349214552241

Related papers

Application of SU(2)canonical transformation and pseudo vector model in the nondegenerate two photon jaynes cumming model

Liang Jun

An exact solution of nondegenerate two photon J C model are derived by the way of SU(2) linear canonical transformation and pseudo vector model.The dynamic formula of the system are shown.

Journal of Anqing Teachers College•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Dynamic symmetries of the vacuum field Jaynes-Cummings model

P. K. Aravind, Guanghui Hu

We use the standard Jaynes-Cummings model with the field initially in the vacuum state and the atom in an arbitrary superposition state to illustrate the concept of dynamic symmetry in quantum optics. By dynamic symmetry we mean a situation in which a Hamiltonian is expressible as a linear combination of operators obeying a Lie algebra. This circumstance permits a psuedospin (or coherence vector) treatment to be given of the dynamics of the system. We give two such interpretations of the Jaynes-Cummings model. In the first we regard the atom and the field as a pair of interacting two-level systems and formulate a SU(2)-SU(2) dynamic symmetry. In the second we interpret the composite atom-field system is a three-level system and formulate a SU(3) dynamic symmetry. The former model illustrates the ideas of Fano1 and the latter those of Hioe and Eberly.2 We give a complete pseudospin description from both points of view and also obtain all the constants of motion.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1988•0 citations

Regular and Chaotic Coherent State Dynamics of Several Quantum Optical Models

Alexander V. Gorokhov, E. V. Rogacheva, Shiryaev, Alexander V.

The coherent state representations of the group $G = W_1 \otimes G_0$ (where $G_0 = SU(2), SU(1,1)$) are used in computer simulation of the dynamics of single two-level atom $(G_0 = SU(2))$ interacting with a quantized photon cavity mode - the Jaynes - Cummings model (JCM) without the rotating wave approximation and, in general, nonlinear in photon variables). The second case (hyperbolic Jaynes - Cummings model (HJCM), $G_0 = SU(1,1))$ corresponds to the quantum dynamics of quadratic nonlinear coupled oscillators (the parametric resonance on double field frequency and a three - wave parametric processes of nonlinear optics). Quasiclassical dynamical equations for parameters of approximately factorizable coherent states for these models are derived and regimes of motion for "atom" and field variables are analyzed.

arXiv:quant-ph/9702016•Feb 6, 1997•0 citations

The pseudo Hermitian invariant operator and time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting a SU(1,1) and SU(2) dynamical symmetry

Walid Koussa, Naima Mana, Oum Kaltoum Djeghiour +1 more

We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting a SU(1,1) and SU(2) dynamical symmetry. With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator. Finally some interesting physical applications are suggested and discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2018•18 citations

Dynamical chaos in several models of quantum optics

Alexander V. Gorokhov, E. V. Rogacheva, A. V. Shiryaev

The coherent state representations of the group G equals W1 (direct product) G0 [where G0 equals SU(2) or SU(1,1)] are used in computer simulations of the dynamic of single two- level atom [G0 equals SU(2)] interacting with a quantized photon cavity mode [Jaynes-Cummings Model (JCM) without the rotating wave approximation] and, in general, nonlinear in photon variables. The second case [hyperbolic Jaynes - Cummings Model (HJCM), G0 equals SU(1,1)] corresponds to the quantum dynamics of quadratic nonlinear coupled oscillators (the parametric resonance on double field frequency and a three-wave parametric processes of nonlinear optics). Quasiclassical dynamical equations for parameters of approximately factorizable coherent states for these models are derived and regimes of motion for 'atom' and field variables are analyzed.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Sep 26, 1997•0 citations

An approach to the time-dependent Jaynes-Cummings model without the rotating wave approximation

Jian Qi Shen

This report presents an approach to the exact solutions of the time-dependent Jaynes-Cummings (J-C) model without the rotating wave approximation (RWA). It is shown that there is a squeezing-operator unitary transformation for relating the J-C model without RWA and the one with RWA. Thus by using an appropriate squeezing unitary transformation, the time-dependent J-C model without RWA can be transformed into the one with RWA that has been exactly solved previously, and based on this one can readily obtain the exact solutions of the time-dependent Jaynes-Cummings (J-C) model without RWA. The approach presented here also shows that we can treat these two kinds of time-dependent J-C models (both with and without RWA) in a unified way.

arXiv:quant-ph/0311140•Nov 20, 2003•1 citation
We construct a pseudo-vector model and realize the rotation transformation for the SU(2) and SU(1,1) dynamics. We introduce concepts of the pseudo-scalar and the scalar product in quantum optics. Several equivalents of the SU(2) and SU(1,1) unified rotation operator are given. By using this method, the two- and three-level Jaynes-Cummings model is discussed in the non-rotating wave approximation.
We use the standard Jaynes-Cummings model with the field initially in the vacuum state and the atom in an arbitrary superposition state to illustrate the concept of dynamic symmetry in quantum optics. By dynamic symmetry we mean a situation in which a Hamiltonian is expressible as a linear combination of operators obeying a Lie algebra. This circumstance permits a psuedospin (or coherence vector) treatment to be given of the dynamics of the system. We give two such interpretations of the Jaynes-Cummings model. In the first we regard the atom and the field as a pair of interacting two-level systems and formulate a SU(2)-SU(2) dynamic symmetry. In the second we interpret the composite atom-field system is a three-level system and formulate a SU(3) dynamic symmetry. The former model illustrates the ideas of Fano1 and the latter those of Hioe and Eberly.2 We give a complete pseudospin description from both points of view and also obtain all the constants of motion.
The coherent state representations of the group G=W1⊗G0G = W_1 \otimes G_0G=W1​⊗G0​ (where G0=SU(2),SU(1,1)G_0 = SU(2), SU(1,1)G0​=SU(2),SU(1,1)) are used in computer simulation of the dynamics of single two-level atom (G0=SU(2))(G_0 = SU(2))(G0​=SU(2)) interacting with a quantized photon cavity mode - the Jaynes - Cummings model (JCM) without the rotating wave approximation and, in general, nonlinear in photon variables). The second case (hyperbolic Jaynes - Cummings model (HJCM), G0=SU(1,1))G_0 = SU(1,1))G0​=SU(1,1)) corresponds to the quantum dynamics of quadratic nonlinear coupled oscillators (the parametric resonance on double field frequency and a three - wave parametric processes of nonlinear optics). Quasiclassical dynamical equations for parameters of approximately factorizable coherent states for these models are derived and regimes of motion for "atom" and field variables are analyzed.
We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting a SU(1,1) and SU(2) dynamical symmetry. With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator. Finally some interesting physical applications are suggested and discussed.
The coherent state representations of the group G equals W1 (direct product) G0 [where G0 equals SU(2) or SU(1,1)] are used in computer simulations of the dynamic of single two- level atom [G0 equals SU(2)] interacting with a quantized photon cavity mode [Jaynes-Cummings Model (JCM) without the rotating wave approximation] and, in general, nonlinear in photon variables. The second case [hyperbolic Jaynes - Cummings Model (HJCM), G0 equals SU(1,1)] corresponds to the quantum dynamics of quadratic nonlinear coupled oscillators (the parametric resonance on double field frequency and a three-wave parametric processes of nonlinear optics). Quasiclassical dynamical equations for parameters of approximately factorizable coherent states for these models are derived and regimes of motion for 'atom' and field variables are analyzed.
This report presents an approach to the exact solutions of the time-dependent Jaynes-Cummings (J-C) model without the rotating wave approximation (RWA). It is shown that there is a squeezing-operator unitary transformation for relating the J-C model without RWA and the one with RWA. Thus by using an appropriate squeezing unitary transformation, the time-dependent J-C model without RWA can be transformed into the one with RWA that has been exactly solved previously, and based on this one can readily obtain the exact solutions of the time-dependent Jaynes-Cummings (J-C) model without RWA. The approach presented here also shows that we can treat these two kinds of time-dependent J-C models (both with and without RWA) in a unified way.