Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Entropy

Intellectual Impostures. By Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. By John von Neumann

Shu‐Kun Lin

Published Jun 30, 2000• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.3390/e2020080

Related papers

John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics

Miklós Rédei, Michael Stöltzner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•84 citations

John von Neumann and the foundations of quantum physics

Tracy Lupher

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Sep 12, 2003•6 citations

Alan Sokal's Hoax and A. Lunn's Theory of Quantum Mechanics

S. I. Weissman, Michael B. Weissman

Physics Today•Jun 1, 1997•4 citations

Commentaire de “Hilbert and von Neumann on the Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”

Presses de l'Université Laval eBooks•Jun 15, 2020•0 citations

John von Neumann's mathematical “Utopia” in quantum theory

Giovanni Valente

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Aug 20, 2008•5 citations

Sexed Equations and Vexed Physicists: the 'two cultures' revisited

Christopher Norris

For Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont this is symptomatic of a widespread intellectual malaise that also goes under the various names of 'post-structuralism', 'literary theory', 'cultural criticism', 'deconstruction', or – on somewhat different but related grounds – the 'strong programme' in sociology of knowledge. The repercussions are rumbling on in various quarters of scientific and literary-cultural academe. They have also provoked a stream of commentary in the up-market dailies and weeklies where the 'Sokal Affair has become a main focus for debate about the current 'Science Wars, themselves basically just another outbreak of the old 'Two Cultures controversy initiated by C.P. Snow in the early 1960s. The trouble is that a great deal of quantum-theoretical debate — including some by eminent physicists — has likewise 'gone overboard' in various speculative directions, beginning with Bohr's obscurely metaphysical thoughts on the topic and continuing with the kinds of argument advanced by adherents of the 'many-minds' and 'many-worlds' interpretations.

Routledge eBooks•Oct 30, 2020•0 citations
For Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont this is symptomatic of a widespread intellectual malaise that also goes under the various names of 'post-structuralism', 'literary theory', 'cultural criticism', 'deconstruction', or – on somewhat different but related grounds – the 'strong programme' in sociology of knowledge. The repercussions are rumbling on in various quarters of scientific and literary-cultural academe. They have also provoked a stream of commentary in the up-market dailies and weeklies where the 'Sokal Affair has become a main focus for debate about the current 'Science Wars, themselves basically just another outbreak of the old 'Two Cultures controversy initiated by C.P. Snow in the early 1960s. The trouble is that a great deal of quantum-theoretical debate — including some by eminent physicists — has likewise 'gone overboard' in various speculative directions, beginning with Bohr's obscurely metaphysical thoughts on the topic and continuing with the kinds of argument advanced by adherents of the 'many-minds' and 'many-worlds' interpretations.