Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics

Miklós Rédei, Michael Stöltzner

Published Jan 1, 2001• 84 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-2012-0

Related papers

John von Neumann and the foundations of quantum physics

Tracy Lupher

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Sep 12, 2003•6 citations

John von Neumann's mathematical “Utopia” in quantum theory

Giovanni Valente

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Aug 20, 2008•5 citations

John Von Neumann on Quantum Correlations

Miklós Rédei

Springer eBooks•Nov 2, 2006•4 citations

What John von Neumann Thought of the Bohm Interpretation

Michael Stöltzner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•22 citations

Is Von Neumann's “No Hidden Variables” Proof Silly?

Jeffrey Bub

Introduction In his Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , John von Neumann presented a proof that the quantum statistics cannot be recovered from probability distributions over “hidden” deterministic states that assign definite premeasurement values to all physical quantities. Von Neumann's proof has been dismissed as “silly” by John Bell and by David Mermin, who writes: Many generations of graduate students who might have been tempted to try to construct hidden-variables theories were beaten into submission by the claim that von Neumann, 1932, had proved that it could not be done. A few years later (see Jammer, 1974, p. 273) Grete Hermann, 1935, pointed out a glaring deficiency in the argument, but she seems to have been entirely ignored. Everybody continued to cite the von Neumann proof. A third of a century passed before John Bell, 1966, rediscovered the fact that von Neumann's nohidden-variables proof was based on an assumption that can only be described as silly—so silly, in fact, that one is led to wonder whether the proof was ever studied by either the students or those who appealed to it to rescue them from speculative adventures.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 18, 2011•9 citations

Von Neumann’s contributions to quantum theory

Léon Van Hove

Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 1958•23 citations
Introduction In his Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , John von Neumann presented a proof that the quantum statistics cannot be recovered from probability distributions over “hidden” deterministic states that assign definite premeasurement values to all physical quantities. Von Neumann's proof has been dismissed as “silly” by John Bell and by David Mermin, who writes: Many generations of graduate students who might have been tempted to try to construct hidden-variables theories were beaten into submission by the claim that von Neumann, 1932, had proved that it could not be done. A few years later (see Jammer, 1974, p. 273) Grete Hermann, 1935, pointed out a glaring deficiency in the argument, but she seems to have been entirely ignored. Everybody continued to cite the von Neumann proof. A third of a century passed before John Bell, 1966, rediscovered the fact that von Neumann's nohidden-variables proof was based on an assumption that can only be described as silly—so silly, in fact, that one is led to wonder whether the proof was ever studied by either the students or those who appealed to it to rescue them from speculative adventures.