Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Designs Codes and Cryptography

Error Probabilities for Bounded Distance Decoding

Andreas Faldum, Julio P. Lafuente, Gustavo Ochoa, Wolfgang M. Willems

Published Jul 4, 2006• 10 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10623-006-0010-x

Related papers

On the Probability of Bit Error for Binary Cyclic Codes with Bounded-Distance Decoding

Min Goo Kim, Jaehong Lee

Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC)•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction beyond the Bounded Distance Decoding Limit

Kenta Kasai, 学 萩原, Manabu Hagiwara +3 more

•Feb 1, 2012•0 citations

Decoding Error Probabilities for Block Codes

Werner Henkel

Signals and communication technology•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Geometrical and performance analysis of GMD and Chase decoding algorithms

Eran Fishler, Ofer Amrani, Yair Be'ery

The overall number of nearest neighbors in bounded distance decoding (BDD) algorithms is given by N/sub 0,eff/=N/sub 0/+N/sub BDD/. Where NBDD denotes the number of additional, non-codeword, neighbors that are generated during the (suboptimal) decoding process. We identify and enumerate the nearest neighbors associated with the original generalized minimum distance (GMD) and Chase (1972) decoding algorithms. After careful examination of the decision regions of these algorithms, we derive an approximated probability ratio between the error contribution of a noncodeword neighbor (one of N/sub BDD/ points) and a codeword nearest neighbor. For Chase algorithm 1 it is shown that the contribution to the error probability of a noncodeword nearest neighbor is a factor of 2/sup d-1/ less than the contribution of a codeword, while for Chase algorithm 2 the factor is 2/sup [d/2]-1/, d being the minimum Hamming distance of the code. For Chase algorithm 3 and GMD, a recursive procedure for calculating this ratio, which turns out to be nonexponential in d, is presented. This procedure can also be used for specifically identifying the error patterns associated with Chase algorithm 3 and GMD. Utilizing the probability ratio, we propose an improved approximated upper bound on the probability of error based on the union bound approach. Simulation results are given to demonstrate and support the analytical derivations.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jul 1, 1999•10 citations

On the Error Rate of Binary BCH Codes under Error-and-erasure Decoding

Sisi Miao, Jonathan Mandelbaum, Holger Jäkel +1 more

Determining the exact decoding error probability of linear block codes is an interesting problem. For binary BCH codes, McEliece derived methods to estimate the error probability of a simple bounded distance decoding (BDD) for BCH codes. However, BDD falls short in many applications. In this work, we consider error-and-erasure decoding and its improved variants. We derive closed-form expressions for their error probabilities and validate them through simulations. Then, we illustrate their use in assessing concatenated coding schemes.

arXiv:2509.24794•Sep 29, 2025•0 citations

An Improvement to Generalized-Minimum-Distance Decoding

Steven S. Pietrobon, Robert Huijie Deng, A. Lafanechere +1 more

•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations
The overall number of nearest neighbors in bounded distance decoding (BDD) algorithms is given by N/sub 0,eff/=N/sub 0/+N/sub BDD/. Where NBDD denotes the number of additional, non-codeword, neighbors that are generated during the (suboptimal) decoding process. We identify and enumerate the nearest neighbors associated with the original generalized minimum distance (GMD) and Chase (1972) decoding algorithms. After careful examination of the decision regions of these algorithms, we derive an approximated probability ratio between the error contribution of a noncodeword neighbor (one of N/sub BDD/ points) and a codeword nearest neighbor. For Chase algorithm 1 it is shown that the contribution to the error probability of a noncodeword nearest neighbor is a factor of 2/sup d-1/ less than the contribution of a codeword, while for Chase algorithm 2 the factor is 2/sup [d/2]-1/, d being the minimum Hamming distance of the code. For Chase algorithm 3 and GMD, a recursive procedure for calculating this ratio, which turns out to be nonexponential in d, is presented. This procedure can also be used for specifically identifying the error patterns associated with Chase algorithm 3 and GMD. Utilizing the probability ratio, we propose an improved approximated upper bound on the probability of error based on the union bound approach. Simulation results are given to demonstrate and support the analytical derivations.
Determining the exact decoding error probability of linear block codes is an interesting problem. For binary BCH codes, McEliece derived methods to estimate the error probability of a simple bounded distance decoding (BDD) for BCH codes. However, BDD falls short in many applications. In this work, we consider error-and-erasure decoding and its improved variants. We derive closed-form expressions for their error probabilities and validate them through simulations. Then, we illustrate their use in assessing concatenated coding schemes.