Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Detection of Coherent Light after Nonlinear Amplification

C. Bendjaballah, Guy Oliver

Published Sep 1, 1981• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Numerical results on the performance of quantum amplifiers in an optical communication system show that because of the spontaneous emission, the probability of error is not improved by the introduction of such devices. It is also concluded that nonlinearity, which is known to reduce the relative fluctuations, will not help to enhance the probability of detection.

DOI
10.1109/taes.1981.309092

Related papers

Statistical properties of coherent radiation in a nonlinear optical amplifier

Guy Oliver, C. Bendjaballah

The differential equation for the photon conditional probability distribution in a nonlinear amplifier is numerically solved, using the continuous approximation. Saturation effects on the development of fluctuations in the amplification of coherent light are studied. They are compared with the results obtained by solving the moment equations.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1980•10 citations

Phase noise in photonic communications systems using linear amplifiers

J. P. Gordon, L. F. Mollenauer

Spontaneous emission noise limits the capacity and range of photonic communications systems that use linear optical amplifiers. We consider here the question of phase detection in such systems. Amplitude-to-phase-noise conversion occurs owing to the nonlinear Kerr effect in the transmission fiber, resulting in optimal phase noise performance when the nonlinear phase shift of the system is approximately 1 rad. Error-free state-of-the-art systems that use phase detection at multigigabit rates are thereby limited to a range of a few thousand kilometers.

Optics Letters•Dec 1, 1990•660 citations

Principles of light amplification

Stefano Bottacchi

Introduction Most of the lightwave transmission systems operating today benefit fully from extensive deployment of optical amplifiers (OA). These components perform the amplification of optical intensity directly in the optical domain, without resorting to any electrical-domain regeneration. Optical amplifiers increase the average number of output photons per unit time by several orders of magnitude compared with the incoming signal intensity. However, as with every amplifying process, optical amplification cannot be achieved without paying back for the unavoidable noise power added to the signal intensity. As we will see in detail in Chapter 6, the optical amplification process comes with optical noise generated by spontaneous emission inside the active medium. The intensity of the optical signal is represented by the flux of the signal photon population. Conversely, the photons generated by the spontaneous emission process inside the optical cavity represent the noise photon population. The fundamental phenomenon supporting optical amplification is stimulated emission. The basic property of stimulated emission, making the great difference from spontaneous emission and enabling optical amplification, is the coherent nature of the photon generation process. Accordingly, both signal and noise photons go through the same multiplication process by means of stimulated emission. Unless the optical cavity where the stimulated emission takes place (the active cavity) presents selective features for enhancing the signal photon population relative to the spontaneous one, there is no way to avoid noise photons going through stimulated emission, filling most of the cavity population. As a consequence, both photon populations increase, leading respectively to amplified signal intensity and to amplified spontaneous emission intensity. It should be apparent that every noise photon can create a new identical noise photon as a result of stimulated emission, effectively increasing the noise intensity in the active optical cavity. This is the well-known mechanism of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in optical amplification. Any improvement in the optical amplifier structure devoted to increasing stimulated over spontaneous emission will probably increase the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) at the cavity output. The spectrum of gain characteristic of the optical active medium is usually wide enough to support an efficient amplification of the broadband spontaneous emission spectrum, leading to the broadband ASE noise power spectral density.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 6, 2014•0 citations

Signal Enhancement by Optical Amplification in Autocorrelation Measurements

Michael Harris, R. Loudon, Terence J. Shepherd +1 more

The effect of optical amplification on the signal-to-noise ratio of autocorrelation measurements has been investigated experimentally. A light signal containing correlation information was amplified by an inverted population (phase-insensitive) optical amplifier. The data clearly show that the amplification may either degrade or enhance a subsequent autocorrelation measurement, depending on the experimental conditions. In particular, enhancement is possible when the detector quantum efficiency is low, or its noise is high. However, when all the signal photons are already being detected with no extra noise, then any optical amplification will inevitably lead to degradation of the data quality, due to addition of amplified spontaneous emission noise (ASE) from the amplifier itself.

Journal of Modern Optics•Apr 1, 1991•5 citations

Quantum theory of a saturable optical amplifier

N. B. Abraham

The intensity fluctuations in the output of a saturable optical amplifier are studied as the amplifier length is increased. Characteristics are determined by calculation of the diagonal elements of the density matrix of the optical field. Saturation affecting both upper-state and lower-state atomic populations is considered. Spontaneous emission distributed along the amplifier causes the "photon-number" distribution to approach a Bose-Einstein distribution during linear amplification if the input field is not Bose-Einstein. The onset of saturation reduces the relative fluctuations of the optical field both by introducing nonlinear gain and by reducing the spontaneous emission. Limiting solutions show that strong saturation leads to a major reduction in the fluctuations causing the photon-number distribution to approach a Poisson distribution.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1980•12 citations

Optical amplifiers for coherent lidar

R. L. Fork

We examine application of optical amplification to coherent lidar for the case of a weak return signal (a number of quanta of the return optical field close to unity). We consider the option that has been explored to date, namely, incorporation of an optical amplifier operated in a linear manner located after reception of the signal and immediately prior to heterodyning and photodetection. We also consider alternative strategies where the coherent interaction, the nonlinear processes, and the amplification are not necessarily constrained to occur in the manner investigated to date. We include the complications that occur because of mechanisms that occur at the level of a few, or one, quantum excitation. Two factors combine in the work to date that limit the value of the approach. These are: (1) the weak signal tends to require operation of the amplifier in the linear regime where the important advantages of nonlinear optical processing are not accessed, (2) the linear optical amplifier has a -3dB noise figure (SN(out)/SN(in)) that necessarily degrades the signal. Some improvement is gained because the gain provided by the optical amplifier can be used to overcome losses in the heterodyned process and photodetection. The result, however, is that introduction of an optical amplifier in a well optimized coherent lidar system results in, at best, a modest improvement in signal to noise. Some improvement may also be realized on incorporating more optical components in a coherent lidar system for purely practical reasons. For example, more compact, lighter weight, components, more robust alignment, or more rapid processing may be gained. We further find that there remain a number of potentially valuable, but unexplored options offered both by the rapidly expanding base of optical technology and the recent investigation of novel nonlinear coherent interference phenomena occurring at the single quantum excitation level. Key findings are: (1) insertion of linear optical amplifiers in well optimized conventional lidar systems offers modest improvements, at best, (2) the practical advantages of optical amplifiers, especially fiber amplifiers, such as ease of alignment, compactness, efficiency, lightweight, etc., warrant further investigation for coherent lidar, (3) the possibility of more fully optical lidar systems should be explored, (4) advantages gained by use of coherent interference of optical fields at the level of one, or a few, signal quanta should be explored, (5) amplification without inversion, population trapping, and use of electromagnetic induced transparency warrant investigation in connection with coherent lidar, (6) these new findings are probably more applicable to earth related NASA work, although applications to deep space should not be excluded, and (7) our own work in the Ultrafast Laboratory at UAH along some of the above lines of investigation, may be useful.

•Feb 1, 1996•0 citations
Numerical results on the performance of quantum amplifiers in an optical communication system show that because of the spontaneous emission, the probability of error is not improved by the introduction of such devices. It is also concluded that nonlinearity, which is known to reduce the relative fluctuations, will not help to enhance the probability of detection.
Spontaneous emission noise limits the capacity and range of photonic communications systems that use linear optical amplifiers. We consider here the question of phase detection in such systems. Amplitude-to-phase-noise conversion occurs owing to the nonlinear Kerr effect in the transmission fiber, resulting in optimal phase noise performance when the nonlinear phase shift of the system is approximately 1 rad. Error-free state-of-the-art systems that use phase detection at multigigabit rates are thereby limited to a range of a few thousand kilometers.
Introduction Most of the lightwave transmission systems operating today benefit fully from extensive deployment of optical amplifiers (OA). These components perform the amplification of optical intensity directly in the optical domain, without resorting to any electrical-domain regeneration. Optical amplifiers increase the average number of output photons per unit time by several orders of magnitude compared with the incoming signal intensity. However, as with every amplifying process, optical amplification cannot be achieved without paying back for the unavoidable noise power added to the signal intensity. As we will see in detail in Chapter 6, the optical amplification process comes with optical noise generated by spontaneous emission inside the active medium. The intensity of the optical signal is represented by the flux of the signal photon population. Conversely, the photons generated by the spontaneous emission process inside the optical cavity represent the noise photon population. The fundamental phenomenon supporting optical amplification is stimulated emission. The basic property of stimulated emission, making the great difference from spontaneous emission and enabling optical amplification, is the coherent nature of the photon generation process. Accordingly, both signal and noise photons go through the same multiplication process by means of stimulated emission. Unless the optical cavity where the stimulated emission takes place (the active cavity) presents selective features for enhancing the signal photon population relative to the spontaneous one, there is no way to avoid noise photons going through stimulated emission, filling most of the cavity population. As a consequence, both photon populations increase, leading respectively to amplified signal intensity and to amplified spontaneous emission intensity. It should be apparent that every noise photon can create a new identical noise photon as a result of stimulated emission, effectively increasing the noise intensity in the active optical cavity. This is the well-known mechanism of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in optical amplification. Any improvement in the optical amplifier structure devoted to increasing stimulated over spontaneous emission will probably increase the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) at the cavity output. The spectrum of gain characteristic of the optical active medium is usually wide enough to support an efficient amplification of the broadband spontaneous emission spectrum, leading to the broadband ASE noise power spectral density.
The effect of optical amplification on the signal-to-noise ratio of autocorrelation measurements has been investigated experimentally. A light signal containing correlation information was amplified by an inverted population (phase-insensitive) optical amplifier. The data clearly show that the amplification may either degrade or enhance a subsequent autocorrelation measurement, depending on the experimental conditions. In particular, enhancement is possible when the detector quantum efficiency is low, or its noise is high. However, when all the signal photons are already being detected with no extra noise, then any optical amplification will inevitably lead to degradation of the data quality, due to addition of amplified spontaneous emission noise (ASE) from the amplifier itself.
The intensity fluctuations in the output of a saturable optical amplifier are studied as the amplifier length is increased. Characteristics are determined by calculation of the diagonal elements of the density matrix of the optical field. Saturation affecting both upper-state and lower-state atomic populations is considered. Spontaneous emission distributed along the amplifier causes the "photon-number" distribution to approach a Bose-Einstein distribution during linear amplification if the input field is not Bose-Einstein. The onset of saturation reduces the relative fluctuations of the optical field both by introducing nonlinear gain and by reducing the spontaneous emission. Limiting solutions show that strong saturation leads to a major reduction in the fluctuations causing the photon-number distribution to approach a Poisson distribution.
We examine application of optical amplification to coherent lidar for the case of a weak return signal (a number of quanta of the return optical field close to unity). We consider the option that has been explored to date, namely, incorporation of an optical amplifier operated in a linear manner located after reception of the signal and immediately prior to heterodyning and photodetection. We also consider alternative strategies where the coherent interaction, the nonlinear processes, and the amplification are not necessarily constrained to occur in the manner investigated to date. We include the complications that occur because of mechanisms that occur at the level of a few, or one, quantum excitation. Two factors combine in the work to date that limit the value of the approach. These are: (1) the weak signal tends to require operation of the amplifier in the linear regime where the important advantages of nonlinear optical processing are not accessed, (2) the linear optical amplifier has a -3dB noise figure (SN(out)/SN(in)) that necessarily degrades the signal. Some improvement is gained because the gain provided by the optical amplifier can be used to overcome losses in the heterodyned process and photodetection. The result, however, is that introduction of an optical amplifier in a well optimized coherent lidar system results in, at best, a modest improvement in signal to noise. Some improvement may also be realized on incorporating more optical components in a coherent lidar system for purely practical reasons. For example, more compact, lighter weight, components, more robust alignment, or more rapid processing may be gained. We further find that there remain a number of potentially valuable, but unexplored options offered both by the rapidly expanding base of optical technology and the recent investigation of novel nonlinear coherent interference phenomena occurring at the single quantum excitation level. Key findings are: (1) insertion of linear optical amplifiers in well optimized conventional lidar systems offers modest improvements, at best, (2) the practical advantages of optical amplifiers, especially fiber amplifiers, such as ease of alignment, compactness, efficiency, lightweight, etc., warrant further investigation for coherent lidar, (3) the possibility of more fully optical lidar systems should be explored, (4) advantages gained by use of coherent interference of optical fields at the level of one, or a few, signal quanta should be explored, (5) amplification without inversion, population trapping, and use of electromagnetic induced transparency warrant investigation in connection with coherent lidar, (6) these new findings are probably more applicable to earth related NASA work, although applications to deep space should not be excluded, and (7) our own work in the Ultrafast Laboratory at UAH along some of the above lines of investigation, may be useful.