Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Canonical transformations and phase space path integrals

Robert L. Fanelli

Published Apr 1, 1976• 26 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A previous discussion of canonical transformations and path integrals is extended to the phase space path integral method. Within this approach a broader class of canonical transformations can be introduced than within the Lagrangian approach, including coordinate transformations and essentially all infinitesimal tranformations.
DOI
10.1063/1.522928

Related papers

Canonical transformations and path integrals

Robert L. Fanelli

A limited class of canonical transformations is introduced into the Lagrangian path integral method of quantization. Path integral quantization in different representations is discussed and a simple example is given.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1975•8 citations

Selecta from a Life-Long Obsession with Path Integrals

John R. Klauder, Christopher Casenas Bernido, M. Victoria Carpio-Bernido

The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Hamiltonian mechanics

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

Path integrals are by and large defined directly in terms of the configuration space representation of the quantum entity's degrees of freedom and employ the Lagrangian description of the quantum entity; most of the path integrals in this book follow this approach. The Hamiltonian provides another independent approach for defining path integrals and is discussed in this chapter. Two important path integrals, which are directly based on the Hamiltonian, are the following: (a) one that is defined on the degree of freedom's phase space , defined as the tensor product of the degree of freedom space and its canonical conjugate momentum space; and (b) path integrals using the coherent state basis instead of the coordinate basis. Path integrals defined on phase space, or for coherent states, are both based on the Hamiltonian. To put in the foreground the role of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, the canonical equations connecting the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian are discussed. A brief review of Hamiltonian mechanics, also called the canonical equations, is given in Section 5.1 and the connection of symmetries with conservation laws is discussed in Section 5.2. The Hamiltonian is derived from the Lagrangian in Section 5.3, for both Minkowski and Euclidean time. Phase space path integrals are defined in Section 5.4. Canonical quantization based on the Poisson brackets is discussed in Section 5.5, and Dirac brackets required for quantizing constrained systems are derived in Section 5.7. Coherent states and their path integrals are discussed in Sections 5.10 to 5.14.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•1 citation

Quantum canonical transformations as integral transformations

Jarmo Hietarinta

We discuss how the Hamiltonian changes in quantum canonical transformations. To the operator $\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}(\stackrel{^}{p},\stackrel{^}{q})$ one can associate (in a given ordering rule) a $c$-number function $\mathcal{H}(p,q)$. It is this function that appears in the action of the phase-space path integral. A quantum canonical transformation $\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ can now be expressed as an integral transformation ${\mathcal{H}}^{\ensuremath{'}}(\overline{p},\overline{q})=\ensuremath{\int}\mathrm{dp}\mathrm{dq}\mathcal{T}(\overline{p},\overline{q};p,q)\mathcal{H}(p,q)$. The kernel $\mathcal{T}$ is constructed explicitly for point transformations and for the $p=\ensuremath{-}\overline{q}$, $q=\overline{p}$ reflection by studying changes of variables in the path integral. The ordering dependence of $\mathcal{T}$ is displayed. The invariance of commutation rules is also discussed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Apr 15, 1982•18 citations

Generalized canonical transformations and path integrals

L. Chétouani, Larbi Guechi, Théophile F. Hammann

Some time-dependent physical systems do not admit, in the general case, either an invariant or auxiliary equation. The study of these systems is then in general made easier by space-time transformation of coordinates. This is true for the case for a rectangular well with a moving wall, which generalized canonical transformations reduce, in the path-integral formalism, to the case of a variable-frequency oscillator with fixed walls. The variable-frequency harmonic oscillator is an example where the invariant and the auxiliary equations can be calculated. All calculations are done in phase space.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1989•32 citations

Path integrals from classical momentum paths

John J. Hegseth

The path integral formulation of quantum mechanics constructs the propagator by evaluating the action S for all classical paths in coordinate space. A corresponding momentum path integral may also be defined through Fourier transforms in the endpoints. Although these momentum path integrals are especially simple for several special cases, no one has, to my knowledge, ever formally constructed them from all classical paths in momentum space. I show that this is possible because there exists another classical mechanics based on an alternate classical action R. Hamilton's Canonical equations result from a variational principle in both S and R. S uses fixed beginning and ending spatial points while R uses fixed beginning and ending momentum points. This alternative action's classical mechanics also includes a Hamilton-Jacobi equation. I also present some important points concerning the beginning and ending conditions on the action necessary to apply a Canonical transformation. These properties explain the failure of the Canonical transformation in the phase space path integral. It follows that a path integral may be constructed from classical position paths using S in the coordinate representation or from classical momentum paths using R in the momentum representation. Several example calculations are presented that illustrate the simplifications and practical advantages made possible by this broader view of the path integral. In particular, the normalized amplitude for a free particle is found without using the Schrodinger equation, the internal spin degree of freedom is simply and naturally derived, and the simple harmonic oscillator is calculated.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403005•Feb 29, 2004•3 citations
The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.
Path integrals are by and large defined directly in terms of the configuration space representation of the quantum entity's degrees of freedom and employ the Lagrangian description of the quantum entity; most of the path integrals in this book follow this approach. The Hamiltonian provides another independent approach for defining path integrals and is discussed in this chapter. Two important path integrals, which are directly based on the Hamiltonian, are the following: (a) one that is defined on the degree of freedom's phase space , defined as the tensor product of the degree of freedom space and its canonical conjugate momentum space; and (b) path integrals using the coherent state basis instead of the coordinate basis. Path integrals defined on phase space, or for coherent states, are both based on the Hamiltonian. To put in the foreground the role of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, the canonical equations connecting the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian are discussed. A brief review of Hamiltonian mechanics, also called the canonical equations, is given in Section 5.1 and the connection of symmetries with conservation laws is discussed in Section 5.2. The Hamiltonian is derived from the Lagrangian in Section 5.3, for both Minkowski and Euclidean time. Phase space path integrals are defined in Section 5.4. Canonical quantization based on the Poisson brackets is discussed in Section 5.5, and Dirac brackets required for quantizing constrained systems are derived in Section 5.7. Coherent states and their path integrals are discussed in Sections 5.10 to 5.14.
We discuss how the Hamiltonian changes in quantum canonical transformations. To the operator $\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}(\stackrel{^}{p},\stackrel{^}{q})$ one can associate (in a given ordering rule) a ccc-number function H(p,q)\mathcal{H}(p,q)H(p,q). It is this function that appears in the action of the phase-space path integral. A quantum canonical transformation $\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ can now be expressed as an integral transformation ${\mathcal{H}}^{\ensuremath{'}}(\overline{p},\overline{q})=\ensuremath{\int}\mathrm{dp}\mathrm{dq}\mathcal{T}(\overline{p},\overline{q};p,q)\mathcal{H}(p,q)$. The kernel T\mathcal{T}T is constructed explicitly for point transformations and for the $p=\ensuremath{-}\overline{q}$, q=p‾q=\overline{p}q=p​ reflection by studying changes of variables in the path integral. The ordering dependence of T\mathcal{T}T is displayed. The invariance of commutation rules is also discussed.
Some time-dependent physical systems do not admit, in the general case, either an invariant or auxiliary equation. The study of these systems is then in general made easier by space-time transformation of coordinates. This is true for the case for a rectangular well with a moving wall, which generalized canonical transformations reduce, in the path-integral formalism, to the case of a variable-frequency oscillator with fixed walls. The variable-frequency harmonic oscillator is an example where the invariant and the auxiliary equations can be calculated. All calculations are done in phase space.
The path integral formulation of quantum mechanics constructs the propagator by evaluating the action S for all classical paths in coordinate space. A corresponding momentum path integral may also be defined through Fourier transforms in the endpoints. Although these momentum path integrals are especially simple for several special cases, no one has, to my knowledge, ever formally constructed them from all classical paths in momentum space. I show that this is possible because there exists another classical mechanics based on an alternate classical action R. Hamilton's Canonical equations result from a variational principle in both S and R. S uses fixed beginning and ending spatial points while R uses fixed beginning and ending momentum points. This alternative action's classical mechanics also includes a Hamilton-Jacobi equation. I also present some important points concerning the beginning and ending conditions on the action necessary to apply a Canonical transformation. These properties explain the failure of the Canonical transformation in the phase space path integral. It follows that a path integral may be constructed from classical position paths using S in the coordinate representation or from classical momentum paths using R in the momentum representation. Several example calculations are presented that illustrate the simplifications and practical advantages made possible by this broader view of the path integral. In particular, the normalized amplitude for a free particle is found without using the Schrodinger equation, the internal spin degree of freedom is simply and naturally derived, and the simple harmonic oscillator is calculated.