Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields

Quantum canonical transformations as integral transformations

Jarmo Hietarinta

Published Apr 15, 1982• 18 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We discuss how the Hamiltonian changes in quantum canonical transformations. To the operator $\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}(\stackrel{^}{p},\stackrel{^}{q})$ one can associate (in a given ordering rule) a $c$-number function $\mathcal{H}(p,q)$. It is this function that appears in the action of the phase-space path integral. A quantum canonical transformation $\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ can now be expressed as an integral transformation ${\mathcal{H}}^{\ensuremath{'}}(\overline{p},\overline{q})=\ensuremath{\int}\mathrm{dp}\mathrm{dq}\mathcal{T}(\overline{p},\overline{q};p,q)\mathcal{H}(p,q)$. The kernel $\mathcal{T}$ is constructed explicitly for point transformations and for the $p=\ensuremath{-}\overline{q}$, $q=\overline{p}$ reflection by studying changes of variables in the path integral. The ordering dependence of $\mathcal{T}$ is displayed. The invariance of commutation rules is also discussed.

DOI
10.1103/physrevd.25.2103

Related papers

Canonical transformations and Hamiltonian path integrals

Прохоров Лев Васильевич

The behavior of Hamiltonian path integrals under canonical transformations defined by a generator is investigated. The exact form of the kernel of the unitary operator which implements the quantum transformation is indicated. Equivalence rules are found (for the Hamiltonian formalism in the one-dimensional case) allowing one to get rid of the nonstandard terms in the action. It is shown that under canonical transformations the Hamiltonian path integral changes its form: in the transformed expression one cannot get along only with the corresponding classical Hamiltonian function.

•Feb 1, 1982•0 citations

Phase-space anomalies and canonical transformations

Mark S. Swanson

Anomalies associated with canonical transformations in quantum-mechanical systems are examined in the context of the path-integral formalism, where they appear as nontrivial Jacobians. The quantum-mechanical anomaly, for the case of a transformation to cyclic coordinates, is shown to be equivalent to a term in the action, similar to a gauge field configuration, whose presence maintains self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian or corrects the phase-space measure of the path integral to reflect the bound-state spectrum of the original problem. Various nonperturbative aspects of quantum-mechanical transition amplitudes are calculated by using classical solutions to Hamilton's equations of motion combined with the anomaly generated by the canonical transformation.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1993•5 citations

Quantum mechanics (QM): Path integrals in phase space

Jean Zinn‐Justin

Abstract In Chapter 2, a path integral representation of the quantum operator e-β H in the case of Hamiltonians H of the separable form p2/2m + V(q) has been constructed. Here, the construction is extended to Hamiltonians that are more general functions of phase space variables. This results in integrals over paths in phase space involving the action expressed in terms of the classical Hamiltonian H(p,q). However, it is shown that, in the general case, the path integral is not completely defined, and this reflects the problem that the classical Hamiltonian does not specify completely the quantum Hamiltonian, due to the problem of ordering quantum operators in products. When the Hamiltonian is a quadratic function of the momentum variables, the integral over momenta is Gaussian and can be performed. In the separable example, the path integral of Chapter 2 is recovered. In the case of the charged particle in a magnetic field a more general form is found, which is ambiguous, since a problem of operator ordering arises, and the ambiguity must be fixed. Hamiltonians that are general quadratic functions provide other important examples, which are analysed thoroughly. Such Hamiltonians appear in the quantization of the motion on Riemannian manifolds. There, the problem of ambiguities is even more severe. The problem is illustrated by the analysis of the quantization of the free motion on the sphere SN−1.

•Apr 15, 2021•0 citations

Canonical transformations and path-integral measures

Mark S. Swanson

This paper is a generalization of previous work on the use of classical canonical transformations to evaluate Hamiltonian path integrals for quantum-mechanical systems. Relevant aspects of the Hamiltonian path integral and its measure are discussed, and used to show that the quantum-mechanical version of the classical transformation does not leave the measure of the path-integral invariant, instead inducing an anomaly. The relation to operator techniques and ordering problems is discussed, and special attention is paid to incorporation of the initial and final states of the transition element into the boundary conditions of the problem. Classical canonical transformations are developed to render an arbitrary power potential cyclic. The resulting Hamiltonian is analyzed as a quantum system to show its relation to known quantum-mechanical results. A perturbative argument is used to suppress ordering-related terms in the transformed Hamiltonian in the event that the classical canonical transformation leads to a nonquadratic cyclic Hamiltonian. The associated anomalies are analyzed to yield general methods to evaluate the path integral's prefactor for such systems. The methods are applied to several systems, including linear and quadratic potentials, the velocity-dependent potential, and the time-dependent harmonic oscillator.

arXiv:hep-th/9406167•Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1994•7 citations

The Jacobi principal function in quantum mechanics

Rafael Ferraro

The canonical functional action in the path integral in phase space is discretized by linking each pair of consecutive vertebral points - and or and - through the invariant complete solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation associated with the classical path defined by these extremes. When the measure is chosen to reflect the geometrical character of the propagator (it must behave as a density of weight in both of its arguments), the resulting infinitesimal propagator is cast in the form of an expansion in a basis of short-time solutions of the wave equation, associated with the eigenfunctions of the initial momenta canonically conjugated to a set of normal coordinates. The operator ordering induced by this prescription is a combination of a symmetrization rule coming from the phase, and a derivative term coming from the measure.

arXiv:quant-ph/9611040•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 1, 1999•1 citation

Path integral invariance under point canonical transformations

Andres Jordan, Matias Libedinsky

It is often stated in the literature on path integrals that naive changes of coordinates might in general give inequivalent theories. The discrepancy is presumably connected to subtleties in the discretization, to the stochastic nature of quantum paths, or to operator order ambiguities in the canonical quantization. Here we argue that in order to define a path integral one needs not only a Lagrangian but also a set of paths that join succesive points in the discretized paths. If the set of paths is maintained when performing a point canonical transformation the path integral does not change. We explicitly show this with the calculation of the free particle kernel in polar coordinates.

•Mar 25, 1997•1 citation
We discuss how the Hamiltonian changes in quantum canonical transformations. To the operator \stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}(\stackrel{^}{p},\stackrel{^}{q}) one can associate (in a given ordering rule) a ccc-number function H(p,q)\mathcal{H}(p,q)H(p,q). It is this function that appears in the action of the phase-space path integral. A quantum canonical transformation \stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\stackrel{^}{\mathcal{H}}}^{\ensuremath{'}} can now be expressed as an integral transformation H\ensuremath′(p‾,q‾)=\ensuremath∫dpdqT(p‾,q‾;p,q)H(p,q){\mathcal{H}}^{\ensuremath{'}}(\overline{p},\overline{q})=\ensuremath{\int}\mathrm{dp}\mathrm{dq}\mathcal{T}(\overline{p},\overline{q};p,q)\mathcal{H}(p,q)H\ensuremath′(p​,q​)=\ensuremath∫dpdqT(p​,q​;p,q)H(p,q). The kernel T\mathcal{T}T is constructed explicitly for point transformations and for the p=\ensuremath−q‾p=\ensuremath{-}\overline{q}p=\ensuremath−q​, q=p‾q=\overline{p}q=p​ reflection by studying changes of variables in the path integral. The ordering dependence of T\mathcal{T}T is displayed. The invariance of commutation rules is also discussed.
The behavior of Hamiltonian path integrals under canonical transformations defined by a generator is investigated. The exact form of the kernel of the unitary operator which implements the quantum transformation is indicated. Equivalence rules are found (for the Hamiltonian formalism in the one-dimensional case) allowing one to get rid of the nonstandard terms in the action. It is shown that under canonical transformations the Hamiltonian path integral changes its form: in the transformed expression one cannot get along only with the corresponding classical Hamiltonian function.
Anomalies associated with canonical transformations in quantum-mechanical systems are examined in the context of the path-integral formalism, where they appear as nontrivial Jacobians. The quantum-mechanical anomaly, for the case of a transformation to cyclic coordinates, is shown to be equivalent to a term in the action, similar to a gauge field configuration, whose presence maintains self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian or corrects the phase-space measure of the path integral to reflect the bound-state spectrum of the original problem. Various nonperturbative aspects of quantum-mechanical transition amplitudes are calculated by using classical solutions to Hamilton's equations of motion combined with the anomaly generated by the canonical transformation.
Abstract In Chapter 2, a path integral representation of the quantum operator e-β H in the case of Hamiltonians H of the separable form p2/2m + V(q) has been constructed. Here, the construction is extended to Hamiltonians that are more general functions of phase space variables. This results in integrals over paths in phase space involving the action expressed in terms of the classical Hamiltonian H(p,q). However, it is shown that, in the general case, the path integral is not completely defined, and this reflects the problem that the classical Hamiltonian does not specify completely the quantum Hamiltonian, due to the problem of ordering quantum operators in products. When the Hamiltonian is a quadratic function of the momentum variables, the integral over momenta is Gaussian and can be performed. In the separable example, the path integral of Chapter 2 is recovered. In the case of the charged particle in a magnetic field a more general form is found, which is ambiguous, since a problem of operator ordering arises, and the ambiguity must be fixed. Hamiltonians that are general quadratic functions provide other important examples, which are analysed thoroughly. Such Hamiltonians appear in the quantization of the motion on Riemannian manifolds. There, the problem of ambiguities is even more severe. The problem is illustrated by the analysis of the quantization of the free motion on the sphere SN−1.
This paper is a generalization of previous work on the use of classical canonical transformations to evaluate Hamiltonian path integrals for quantum-mechanical systems. Relevant aspects of the Hamiltonian path integral and its measure are discussed, and used to show that the quantum-mechanical version of the classical transformation does not leave the measure of the path-integral invariant, instead inducing an anomaly. The relation to operator techniques and ordering problems is discussed, and special attention is paid to incorporation of the initial and final states of the transition element into the boundary conditions of the problem. Classical canonical transformations are developed to render an arbitrary power potential cyclic. The resulting Hamiltonian is analyzed as a quantum system to show its relation to known quantum-mechanical results. A perturbative argument is used to suppress ordering-related terms in the transformed Hamiltonian in the event that the classical canonical transformation leads to a nonquadratic cyclic Hamiltonian. The associated anomalies are analyzed to yield general methods to evaluate the path integral's prefactor for such systems. The methods are applied to several systems, including linear and quadratic potentials, the velocity-dependent potential, and the time-dependent harmonic oscillator.
The canonical functional action in the path integral in phase space is discretized by linking each pair of consecutive vertebral points - and or and - through the invariant complete solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation associated with the classical path defined by these extremes. When the measure is chosen to reflect the geometrical character of the propagator (it must behave as a density of weight in both of its arguments), the resulting infinitesimal propagator is cast in the form of an expansion in a basis of short-time solutions of the wave equation, associated with the eigenfunctions of the initial momenta canonically conjugated to a set of normal coordinates. The operator ordering induced by this prescription is a combination of a symmetrization rule coming from the phase, and a derivative term coming from the measure.
It is often stated in the literature on path integrals that naive changes of coordinates might in general give inequivalent theories. The discrepancy is presumably connected to subtleties in the discretization, to the stochastic nature of quantum paths, or to operator order ambiguities in the canonical quantization. Here we argue that in order to define a path integral one needs not only a Lagrangian but also a set of paths that join succesive points in the discretized paths. If the set of paths is maintained when performing a point canonical transformation the path integral does not change. We explicitly show this with the calculation of the free particle kernel in polar coordinates.