Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Computer and System Sciences

Space-Bounded Quantum Complexity

John Watrous

Published Oct 1, 1999• 59 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1006/jcss.1999.1655

Related papers

Complexity Bounds of Constant-Space Quantum Computation

Tomoyuki Yamakami

arXiv:1606.08764•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2015•1 citation

On the complexity of simulating space-bounded quantum computations

John Watrous

Computational Complexity•Jun 1, 2003•60 citations

Quantum branching programs and space-bounded nonuniform quantum complexity

Martin Sauerhoff, Detlef Sieling

arXiv:quant-ph/0403164•Theoretical Computer Science•Feb 8, 2005•41 citations

Quantum Computational Complexity

John Watrous

Springer eBooks•Nov 2, 2011•47 citations

The Complexity of Quantum Disjointness

Hartmut Klauck

We introduce the communication problem QNDISJ, short for Quantum (Unique) Non-Disjointness, and study its complexity under different modes of communication complexity. The main motivation for the problem is that it is a candidate for the separation of the quantum communication complexity classes QMA and QCMA. The problem generalizes the Vector-in-Subspace and Non-Disjointness problems. We give tight bounds for the QMA, quantum, randomized communication complexities of the problem. We show polynomially related upper and lower bounds for the MA complexity. We also show an upper bound for QCMA protocols, and show that the bound is tight for a natural class of QCMA protocols for the problem. The latter lower bound is based on a geometric lemma, that states that every subset of the n-dimensional sphere of measure 2^-p must contain an ortho-normal set of points of size Omega(n/p). We also study a "small-spaces" version of the problem, and give upper and lower bounds for its randomized complexity that show that the QNDISJ problem is harder than Non-disjointness for randomized protocols. Interestingly, for quantum modes the complexity depends only on the dimension of the smaller space, whereas for classical modes the dimension of the larger space matters.

Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2017•3 citations

Quantum computational complexity

Daowen Qiu

Elsevier eBooks•Aug 29, 2025•0 citations
We introduce the communication problem QNDISJ, short for Quantum (Unique) Non-Disjointness, and study its complexity under different modes of communication complexity. The main motivation for the problem is that it is a candidate for the separation of the quantum communication complexity classes QMA and QCMA. The problem generalizes the Vector-in-Subspace and Non-Disjointness problems. We give tight bounds for the QMA, quantum, randomized communication complexities of the problem. We show polynomially related upper and lower bounds for the MA complexity. We also show an upper bound for QCMA protocols, and show that the bound is tight for a natural class of QCMA protocols for the problem. The latter lower bound is based on a geometric lemma, that states that every subset of the n-dimensional sphere of measure 2^-p must contain an ortho-normal set of points of size Omega(n/p). We also study a "small-spaces" version of the problem, and give upper and lower bounds for its randomized complexity that show that the QNDISJ problem is harder than Non-disjointness for randomized protocols. Interestingly, for quantum modes the complexity depends only on the dimension of the smaller space, whereas for classical modes the dimension of the larger space matters.