Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0403164 · Theoretical Computer Science

Quantum branching programs and space-bounded nonuniform quantum complexity

Martin Sauerhoff, Detlef Sieling

Published Feb 8, 2005• 41 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.tcs.2004.12.031

Related papers

Quantum and Stochastic Branching Programs of Bounded Width

Farid Mansurovich Ablayev, Cristopher Moore, Christopher John Pollett

arXiv:quant-ph/0201139•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2002•13 citations

The Complexity of Classical and Quantum Branching Programs: A Communication Complexity Approach

Farid Mansurovich Ablayev

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Quantum and stochastic branching programs of bounded width: (Track A)

Farid Mansurovich Ablayev, Cristopher Moore, Christopher John Pollett

•Jan 1, 2002•1 citation

Lower Bound and Hierarchies for Quantum Ordered Read-K-Times Branching Programs

Kamil Ravilevich Khadiev, Farid Mansurovich Ablayev, Aliya Khadieva +1 more

•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations

On computational power of classical and quantum branching programs

Farid Mansurovich Ablayev

We present a classical stochastic simulation technique of quantum Branching programs. This technique allows to prove the following relations among complexity classes: PrQP-BP &subuline; PP-BP and BQP-BP &subuline; PP-BP. Here BPP-BP and PP-BP stands for the classes of functions computable with bounded error and unbounded error respectively by stochastic branching program of polynomial size. BQP-BP and PrQP-BP stands the classes of functions computable with bounded error and unbounded error respectively by quantum branching program of polynomial size. Second. We present two different types, of complexity lower bounds for quantum nonuniform automata (OBDDs). We call them "metric" and "entropic" lower bounds in according to proof technique used. We present explicit Boolean functions that show that these lower bounds are tight enough. We show that when considering "almost all Boolean functions" on n variables our entropic lower bounds gives exponential (2c(δ)(n-log n)) lower bound for the width of quantum OBDDs depending on the error δ allowed.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•May 24, 2006•1 citation

On Computational Power of Quantum Branching Programs

Farid Mansurovich Ablayev, Aida Gainutdinova, Marek Karpiński

arXiv:quant-ph/0302022•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2001•41 citations
We present a classical stochastic simulation technique of quantum Branching programs. This technique allows to prove the following relations among complexity classes: PrQP-BP &subuline; PP-BP and BQP-BP &subuline; PP-BP. Here BPP-BP and PP-BP stands for the classes of functions computable with bounded error and unbounded error respectively by stochastic branching program of polynomial size. BQP-BP and PrQP-BP stands the classes of functions computable with bounded error and unbounded error respectively by quantum branching program of polynomial size. Second. We present two different types, of complexity lower bounds for quantum nonuniform automata (OBDDs). We call them "metric" and "entropic" lower bounds in according to proof technique used. We present explicit Boolean functions that show that these lower bounds are tight enough. We show that when considering "almost all Boolean functions" on n variables our entropic lower bounds gives exponential (2c(δ)(n-log n)) lower bound for the width of quantum OBDDs depending on the error δ allowed.