Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Comment on “Geometric phase in coupled neutron interference loops”

Apoorva G. Wagh

Published Feb 1, 1999• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Two interferometrically split and recombined subbeams which are in the same quantum state are treated as mutually orthogonal states by Hasegawa et al. [Phys. Rev. A 53, 2486 (1996)]. This conceptual error has created the illusion of a geometric phase in U(1) evolutions.
DOI
10.1103/physreva.59.1715

Related papers

Geometric phase in coupled neutron interference loops

Yuji Hasegawa, Michael Zawisky, H. Rauch +1 more

A geometric phase factor is derived for a split-beam experiment as an example of cyclic evolutions. Poincar\'e sphere descriptions for the split-beam experiment show its geometric property. We observe this geometric phase with a two-loop neutron interferometer, where a reference beam can be added to the beam from one interference loop. The combination of phase shifters and partial absorbers permitted the compensation of the dynamical phase and measurement of the geometric phase. All the experimental results show complete agreement with our theoretical treatment. We discuss a situation where a geometric phase exists even when the dynamical phase becomes zero. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1996•40 citations

Geometric phase in neutron interferometer experiments

Yuji Hasegawa

Neutron interferometer experiments have served as elegant demonstrations of the foundations of quantum mechanics. We show here two interferometer-experiments: one is the demonstration of a geometric phase in a split-beam experiment and the other is the measurement of off-diagonal geometric phase acquired in an evolution of a 1/2-spin system. The former was accomplished with the use of a two-loop neutron interferometer, where a reference beam can be added to the beam from one interference ioop. The combination of phase shifters and partial absorbers permitted the compensation of the dynamical phase and measurement of the geometric phase. The latter is investigated by means of a polarized neutron interferometer. Final counts with and without the polarization analysis enabled us to observe both the off-diagonal and diagonal geometric phases in two detectors. All experimental results show complete agreement with theoretical treatments.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jul 23, 2002•0 citations

Reply to Comment on Geometric phases for mixed states during cyclic evolutions

L-B Fu, J-L Chen

We show that the geometric phase for mixed state during a cyclic evolution suggested in 2004 J. Phys. A 37 3699 is U(1) invariant and can be observed by nowaday techniques.

arXiv:quant-ph/0407076•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 8, 2004•2 citations

Geometric phase in a split-beam experiment measured with coupled neutron interference loops

Yuji Hasegawa, Michael Zawisky, H. Rauch +1 more

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Comment on ``Cyclic quantum-evolution dependence on the Hamiltonian and geometric phase''

Ali Mostafazadeh

It is shown that the analysis and the main result of the article by L-A. Wu [Phys. Rev. A 53, 2053 (1996)] are completely erroneous.

arXiv:quant-ph/9606022•Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1997•4 citations

Noncyclic geometric phase due to spatial evolution in a neutron interferometer

Stefan Filipp, Yuji Hasegawa, Rudolf Loidl +1 more

We present a split-beam neutron interferometric experiment to test the noncyclic geometric phase tied to the spatial evolution of the system: The subjacent two-dimensional Hilbert space is spanned by the two possible paths in the interferometer, and the evolution of the state is controlled by phase shifters and absorbers. A related experiment was reported previously by Hasegawa et al. [Phys Rev A 53, 2486 (1996)] to verify the cyclic spatial geometric phase. The interpretation of this experiment, namely to ascribe a geometric phase to this particular state evolution, has met with severe criticism from Wagh [Phys. Rev A 59, 1715 (1999)]. The extension to a noncyclic evolution manifests the correctness of the interpretation of the previous experiment by means of an explicit calculation of the noncyclic geometric phase in terms of paths on the Bloch-sphere.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412038•Physical Review A•Aug 10, 2005•42 citations
A geometric phase factor is derived for a split-beam experiment as an example of cyclic evolutions. Poincar\'e sphere descriptions for the split-beam experiment show its geometric property. We observe this geometric phase with a two-loop neutron interferometer, where a reference beam can be added to the beam from one interference loop. The combination of phase shifters and partial absorbers permitted the compensation of the dynamical phase and measurement of the geometric phase. All the experimental results show complete agreement with our theoretical treatment. We discuss a situation where a geometric phase exists even when the dynamical phase becomes zero. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Neutron interferometer experiments have served as elegant demonstrations of the foundations of quantum mechanics. We show here two interferometer-experiments: one is the demonstration of a geometric phase in a split-beam experiment and the other is the measurement of off-diagonal geometric phase acquired in an evolution of a 1/2-spin system. The former was accomplished with the use of a two-loop neutron interferometer, where a reference beam can be added to the beam from one interference ioop. The combination of phase shifters and partial absorbers permitted the compensation of the dynamical phase and measurement of the geometric phase. The latter is investigated by means of a polarized neutron interferometer. Final counts with and without the polarization analysis enabled us to observe both the off-diagonal and diagonal geometric phases in two detectors. All experimental results show complete agreement with theoretical treatments.
We present a split-beam neutron interferometric experiment to test the noncyclic geometric phase tied to the spatial evolution of the system: The subjacent two-dimensional Hilbert space is spanned by the two possible paths in the interferometer, and the evolution of the state is controlled by phase shifters and absorbers. A related experiment was reported previously by Hasegawa et al. [Phys Rev A 53, 2486 (1996)] to verify the cyclic spatial geometric phase. The interpretation of this experiment, namely to ascribe a geometric phase to this particular state evolution, has met with severe criticism from Wagh [Phys. Rev A 59, 1715 (1999)]. The extension to a noncyclic evolution manifests the correctness of the interpretation of the previous experiment by means of an explicit calculation of the noncyclic geometric phase in terms of paths on the Bloch-sphere.