Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Generalized coherent states and Berry’s phase

G. Giavarini, E. Onofri

Published Mar 1, 1989• 35 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The quantum dynamics of time-dependent Hamiltonians of the kind H(t)=U(t)H(0)U(t)° is studied in the framework of generalized coherent states. It is shown that the quantum and the classical dynamics are isomorphic and that the phase of ‖ψ(t)〉 is simply the classical action. In adiabatic approximation it is easy to extract Berry’s phase from this. A discussion of generalized coherent states (CS’s) necessary to deal with excited states is given; in particular for SU(2), SU(1,1) and E(2) their structure is completely characterized, showing that the deep connection with geometric quantization extends to these generalized CS’s. This technique may be employed to estimate higher-order correction to the adiabatic approximation.

DOI
10.1063/1.528434

Related papers

Quantum Adiabatic Approximation, Quantum Action, and Berry’s Phase

Ali Mostafazadeh

An alternative interpretation of the quantum adiabatic approximation is presented. This interpretation is based on the ideas originally advocated by David Bohm in his quest for establishing a hidden variable alternative to quantum mechanics. It indicates that the validity of the quantum adiabatic approximation is a sufficient condition for the separability of the quantum action function in the time variable. The implications of this interpretation for Berry’s adiabatic phase and its semi-classical limit are also discussed. Probably one of the best recognized applications of the quantum adiabatic approximation [1, 2] is in Berry’s derivation of the adiabatic geometrical phases [3]. Following Berry’s, by now, classical article on the adiabatic geometric phase [3], Hannay proposed a classical analogue of Berry’s phase [4] and Berry [5] and Anandan [6] explored the semiclassical limit of Berry’s phase and the classical analogue of the general, non-adiabatic geometric phase [7], respectively. The purpose of this note is to provide an alternative interpretation of the quantum adiabatic approximation which yields a natural approach to study the semi-classical limit of this approximation and consequently Berry’s phase.

•Jan 1, 1996•4 citations

6. Coherent quantum physics

Arnold Neumaier

Coherent quantum physics is quantum physics in terms of a coherent space and an appropriate coherent product. The kinematical structure and the meaning of the quantities are given by the symmetries (invertible coherent maps) of the coherent space. If Z is a coherent manifold, a canonical symplectic form is often canonically determined by the coherent product through the coherent action principle discussed in Section 6.1. In a quantum mechanical context, Z is indeed a classical phase space or an extended phase space-typically a symplectic manifold, a Poisson manifold, or a circle or line bundle over such a manifold that incorporates the classical action variable (encoding the Berry phase under quantization). For example, the Aharonov-Bohm effect [3] needs the bundle formulation. A coherent space and its quantum space provide a classical and a quantum view of the same physical system, discussed in Section 6.2. Section 6.3 shows that symmetries of coherent spaces can be quantized, that is, promoted to linear operators on the quantum space. This leads to quantum dynamics, which in special (completely integrable) situations can be solved in closed form in terms of classical motions on the underlying coherent space, if the latter has a compatible manifold structure. Close relations to concepts from geometric quantization and Kähler manifolds are pointed out in Section 6.4. In order that the quantum space of a coherent space Z can describe physics, one needs not only a distinguished class of coherent states but a more general concept of state. In Sections 6.5-6.6, we give a general abstract setting for states in Lie ∗-algebras, emphasize the essential mathematical features and the close analogy between classical and quantum physics. We illustrate these generalities with a number of examples in Section 6.7. The coherent action principle is put to use in Section 6.8 for numerical quantum physics and an application to quantum chaos. Spectral issues can, in favorable cases, be handled in terms of dynamical Lie algebras, discussed in Section 6.9.

De Gruyter eBooks•Oct 24, 2019•0 citations

Adiabatic and nonadiabatic evolution of a generalized damped harmonic oscillator

I. A. Pedrosa

In this work we present a simple and elegant approach to study the adiabatic and nonadiabatic evolution of a generalized damped harmonic oscillator which is described by the generalized Caldirola–Kanai Hamiltonian, in both classical and quantum contexts. Based on time-dependent dynamical invariants, we find that the geometric phase acquired when the damped oscillator evolves adiabatically in time provides a direct connection between the classical Hannay’s angle and the quantum Berry’s phase. In addition, we solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for this system and calculate various quantum properties of the damped generalized harmonic one, such as coherent states, expectation values of the position and momentum operators, their quantum fluctuations and the associated uncertainty product.

Modern Physics Letters A•Sep 14, 2021•3 citations

Algebraic approach and Berry phase of a Hamiltonian with a general SU (1, 1) symmetry

E. Choreño, R. Valencia, D. Ojeda-Guillén

In this paper, we study a general Hamiltonian with a linear structure given in terms of two different realizations of the SU(1, 1) group. We diagonalize this Hamiltonian by using the similarity transformations of the SU(1, 1) and SU(2) displacement operators performed to the su(1, 1) Lie algebra generators. Then, we compute the Berry phase of a general time-dependent Hamiltonian with this general SU(1, 1) linear structure.

arXiv:2008.13271•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2021•4 citations

Maslov Phase as Geometric Phase in the Time-Dependent Variational Approach with Squeezed Coherent States

Y. Tsue

Toward the classical description of quantum fluctuations in quantal systems, the Maslov phase occurring in a semi-classical quantization rule is investigated in a framework of the time-dependent variational principle with squeezed coherent states. In the limit of a semi-classical approximation in this approach, it is definitely shown that the Maslov phase has a geometric nature analogous to Berry's phases or canonical phases including dynamical effects. The Maslov phase appears as a winding number in this framework. It is also indicated that this squeezed coherent state approach is a possible way to go beyond the usual WKB approximation.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 1992•24 citations

Berry’s phase and the symplectic character of quantum time evolution

John P. Ralston

General time-dependent, bilinear classical Lagrangian mechanics can be interpreted as a charged particle interacting with a gauge scalar and vector potential. For an arbitrary discrete number of degrees of freedom, there are enough symplectic symmetries in classical mechanics to make this system canonically identical to the most general discrete spectrum quantum system. It follows that the general invariance group of the Schr\"odinger system of equations is the symplectic group Sp(2N), not U(N). Several examples show the physical naturalness of the classical coordinates. In the adiabatic limit Berry's phase is identified as the cumulative change of the angle of action-angle coordinates of a normal mode. A generalization of Berry's phase, the time component of the adiabatic connection and its associated electric curvature, is shown to be on an equal footing with the usual Berry phase.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1989•14 citations
The quantum dynamics of time-dependent Hamiltonians of the kind H(t)=U(t)H(0)U(t)° is studied in the framework of generalized coherent states. It is shown that the quantum and the classical dynamics are isomorphic and that the phase of ‖ψ(t)〉 is simply the classical action. In adiabatic approximation it is easy to extract Berry’s phase from this. A discussion of generalized coherent states (CS’s) necessary to deal with excited states is given; in particular for SU(2), SU(1,1) and E(2) their structure is completely characterized, showing that the deep connection with geometric quantization extends to these generalized CS’s. This technique may be employed to estimate higher-order correction to the adiabatic approximation.
An alternative interpretation of the quantum adiabatic approximation is presented. This interpretation is based on the ideas originally advocated by David Bohm in his quest for establishing a hidden variable alternative to quantum mechanics. It indicates that the validity of the quantum adiabatic approximation is a sufficient condition for the separability of the quantum action function in the time variable. The implications of this interpretation for Berry’s adiabatic phase and its semi-classical limit are also discussed. Probably one of the best recognized applications of the quantum adiabatic approximation [1, 2] is in Berry’s derivation of the adiabatic geometrical phases [3]. Following Berry’s, by now, classical article on the adiabatic geometric phase [3], Hannay proposed a classical analogue of Berry’s phase [4] and Berry [5] and Anandan [6] explored the semiclassical limit of Berry’s phase and the classical analogue of the general, non-adiabatic geometric phase [7], respectively. The purpose of this note is to provide an alternative interpretation of the quantum adiabatic approximation which yields a natural approach to study the semi-classical limit of this approximation and consequently Berry’s phase.
Coherent quantum physics is quantum physics in terms of a coherent space and an appropriate coherent product. The kinematical structure and the meaning of the quantities are given by the symmetries (invertible coherent maps) of the coherent space. If Z is a coherent manifold, a canonical symplectic form is often canonically determined by the coherent product through the coherent action principle discussed in Section 6.1. In a quantum mechanical context, Z is indeed a classical phase space or an extended phase space-typically a symplectic manifold, a Poisson manifold, or a circle or line bundle over such a manifold that incorporates the classical action variable (encoding the Berry phase under quantization). For example, the Aharonov-Bohm effect [3] needs the bundle formulation. A coherent space and its quantum space provide a classical and a quantum view of the same physical system, discussed in Section 6.2. Section 6.3 shows that symmetries of coherent spaces can be quantized, that is, promoted to linear operators on the quantum space. This leads to quantum dynamics, which in special (completely integrable) situations can be solved in closed form in terms of classical motions on the underlying coherent space, if the latter has a compatible manifold structure. Close relations to concepts from geometric quantization and Kähler manifolds are pointed out in Section 6.4. In order that the quantum space of a coherent space Z can describe physics, one needs not only a distinguished class of coherent states but a more general concept of state. In Sections 6.5-6.6, we give a general abstract setting for states in Lie ∗-algebras, emphasize the essential mathematical features and the close analogy between classical and quantum physics. We illustrate these generalities with a number of examples in Section 6.7. The coherent action principle is put to use in Section 6.8 for numerical quantum physics and an application to quantum chaos. Spectral issues can, in favorable cases, be handled in terms of dynamical Lie algebras, discussed in Section 6.9.
In this work we present a simple and elegant approach to study the adiabatic and nonadiabatic evolution of a generalized damped harmonic oscillator which is described by the generalized Caldirola–Kanai Hamiltonian, in both classical and quantum contexts. Based on time-dependent dynamical invariants, we find that the geometric phase acquired when the damped oscillator evolves adiabatically in time provides a direct connection between the classical Hannay’s angle and the quantum Berry’s phase. In addition, we solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for this system and calculate various quantum properties of the damped generalized harmonic one, such as coherent states, expectation values of the position and momentum operators, their quantum fluctuations and the associated uncertainty product.
Toward the classical description of quantum fluctuations in quantal systems, the Maslov phase occurring in a semi-classical quantization rule is investigated in a framework of the time-dependent variational principle with squeezed coherent states. In the limit of a semi-classical approximation in this approach, it is definitely shown that the Maslov phase has a geometric nature analogous to Berry's phases or canonical phases including dynamical effects. The Maslov phase appears as a winding number in this framework. It is also indicated that this squeezed coherent state approach is a possible way to go beyond the usual WKB approximation.
General time-dependent, bilinear classical Lagrangian mechanics can be interpreted as a charged particle interacting with a gauge scalar and vector potential. For an arbitrary discrete number of degrees of freedom, there are enough symplectic symmetries in classical mechanics to make this system canonically identical to the most general discrete spectrum quantum system. It follows that the general invariance group of the Schr\"odinger system of equations is the symplectic group Sp(2N), not U(N). Several examples show the physical naturalness of the classical coordinates. In the adiabatic limit Berry's phase is identified as the cumulative change of the angle of action-angle coordinates of a normal mode. A generalization of Berry's phase, the time component of the adiabatic connection and its associated electric curvature, is shown to be on an equal footing with the usual Berry phase.