Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optical and Quantum Electronics

To the comment of L. M. Kovachev

Ivan M. Uzunov

Published Apr 1, 1994• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00304248

Related papers

Discussion: Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•17 citations

Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Comments on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'and 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'

Jie Yang, Hao Yuan, Zhanjun Zhang

This paper includes two comments. The first one is a comment on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'. Two different efficient methods are presented to modify some details of N. Ba An's protocol, so that teleportation of two quNit entanglement can be successfully achieved in terms of the revised N. Ba An's protocol. The second one is a comment on 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'.

arXiv:quant-ph/0611184•Nov 17, 2006•0 citations

Answer to Selleri and Vigier

O. Costa de Beauregard

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Dec 1, 1980•4 citations

A close look at Jeckelmann's weak-coupling results: Reply to the Comment by Jeckelmann

G. P. Zhang

We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However, since this response was written before his revised comment came out, new issues in his new comment, which will be commented if necessary, are not discussed at present. Although some changes are made in his new comment as we suggested in the response, we still see many other new and old misleading statements and results. We kindly suggest the author correct them since evidence is very compelling.

arXiv:cond-mat/0401561•Jan 27, 2004•0 citations

Reply to the Comment of E. A. Cornell

Erling Riis, S. M. Barnett

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jun 1, 1995•3 citations
We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However, since this response was written before his revised comment came out, new issues in his new comment, which will be commented if necessary, are not discussed at present. Although some changes are made in his new comment as we suggested in the response, we still see many other new and old misleading statements and results. We kindly suggest the author correct them since evidence is very compelling.