Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

New Journal of Physics

Focus on Quantum Cryptography: Theory and Practice

Norbert Lütkenhaus, A. J. Shields

Published Apr 30, 2009• 48 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum cryptography, and especially quantum key distribution (QKD), is steadily progressing to become a viable tool for cryptographic services. In recent years we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the secure bit rate of QKD, as well as its extension to ever longer fibre- and air-based links and the emergence of metro-scale trusted networks. In the foreseeable future even global-scale communications may be possible using quantum repeaters or Earth–satellite links. A handful of start-ups and some bigger companies are already active in the field. The launch of an initiative to form industrial standards for QKD, under the auspices of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute, described in the paper by Laenger and Lenhart in this Focus Issue, can be taken as a sign of the growing commercial interest. Recent progress has seen an increase in the secure bit rate of QKD links, by orders of magnitude, to over 1 Mb s −1 . This has resulted mainly from an improvement in the detection technology. Here changes in the way conventional semiconductor detectors are gated, as well as the development of novel devices based on non-linear processes and superconducting materials, are leading the way. Additional challenges for QKD at GHz clock rates include the design of high speed electronics, remote synchronization and high rate random number generation. Substantial effort is being devoted to increasing the range of individual links, which is limited by attenuation and other losses in optical fibres and air links. An important advance in the past few years has been the introduction of protocols with the same scaling as an ideal single-photon set-up. The good news is that these schemes use standard optical devices, such as weak laser pulses. Thanks to these new protocols and improvements in the detection technology, the range of a single fibre link can exceed a few hundred km. Outstanding issues include proving the unconditional security of some of the schemes. Much of the work done to date relates to point-to-point links. Another recent advance has been the development of trusted networks for QKD. This is important for further increasing the range of the technology, and for overcoming denial-of-service attacks on an individual link. It is interesting to see that the optimization of QKD devices differs for point-to-point and network applications. Network operation is essential for widespread adoption of the technology, as it can dramatically reduce the deployment costs and allow connection flexibility. Also important is the multiplexing of the quantum signals with conventional network traffic. For the future, quantum repeaters should be developed for longer range links. On the theoretical side, different approaches to security proofs have recently started to converge, offering several paradigms of the same basic idea. Our improved theoretical understanding places more stringent demands on the QKD devices. We are aware by now that finite size effects in key generation arise not only from parameter estimation. It will not be possible to generate a key from just a few hundred received signals. It is a stimulating challenge for the theory of security proofs to develop lean proof strategies that work with finite signal block sizes. As QKD advances to a real-world cryptographic solution, side channel attacks must be carefully analysed. Theoretical security proofs for QKD schemes are so far based on physical models of these devices. It is in the nature of models that any real implementation will deviate from this model, creating a potential weakness for an eavesdropper to exploit. There are two solutions to this problem: the traditional path of refining the models to reduce the deviations, or the radically different approach of device-independent security proofs, in which none or only a few well controlled assumptions about the devices are made. Clearly, it is desirable to find security proofs that require only minimal or fairly general model descriptions and are based on observable tests during the run of QKD sessions. It is now 25 years since the first proposal for QKD was published and 20 since the first experimental realization. The intervening years have brought several technological and theoretical advances, which have driven new insights into the application of quantum theory to the wider field of information technology. We are looking forward to the new twists and turns this field will take in the next 25 years! Focus on Quantum Cryptography: Theory and Practice Contents Security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution: towards a de Finetti theorem for rotation symmetry in phase space A Leverrier, E Karpov, P Grangier and N J Cerf Optical networking for quantum key distribution and quantum communications T E Chapuran, P Toliver, N A Peters, J Jackel, M S Goodman, R J Runser, S R McNown, N Dallmann, R J Hughes, K P McCabe, J E Nordholt, C G Peterson, K T Tyagi, L Mercer and H Dardy Proof-of-concept of real-world quantum key distribution with quantum frames I Lucio-Martinez, P Chan, X Mo, S Hosier and W Tittel Composability in quantum cryptography Jörn Müller-Quade and Renato Renner Distributed authentication for randomly compromised networks Travis R Beals, Kevin P Hynes and Barry C Sanders Feasibility of 300 km quantum key distribution with entangled states Thomas Scheidl, Rupert Ursin, Alessandro Fedrizzi, Sven Ramelow, Xiao-Song Ma, Thomas Herbst, Robert Prevedel, Lothar Ratschbacher, Johannes Kofler, Thomas Jennewein and Anton Zeilinger Decoy-state quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations Xiang-Bin Wang, Lin Yang, Cheng-Zhi Peng and Jian-Wei Pan High rate, long-distance quantum key distribution over 250 km of ultra low loss fibres D Stucki, N Walenta, F Vannel, R T Thew, N Gisin, H Zbinden, S Gray, C R Towery and S Ten Topological optimization of quantum key distribution networks R Alléaume, F Roueff, E Diamanti and N Lütkenhaus The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna M Peev, C Pacher, R Alléaume, C Barreiro, J Bouda, W Boxleitner, T Debuisschert, E Diamanti, M Dianati, J F Dynes, S Fasel, S Fossier, M Fürst, J-D Gautier, O Gay, N Gisin, P Grangier, A Happe, Y Hasani, M Hentschel, H Hübel, G Humer, T Länger, M Legré, R Lieger, J Lodewyck, T Lorünser, N Lütkenhaus, A Marhold, T Matyus, O Maurhart, L Monat, S Nauerth, J-B Page, A Poppe, E Querasser, G Ribordy, S Robyr, L Salvail, A W Sharpe, A J Shields, D Stucki, M Suda, C Tamas, T Themel, R T Thew, Y Thoma, A Treiber, P Trinkler, R Tualle-Brouri, F Vannel, N Walenta, H Weier, H Weinfurter, I Wimberger, Z L Yuan, H Zbinden and A Zeilinger Stable quantum key distribution with active polarization control based on time-division multiplexing J Chen, G Wu, L Xu, X Gu, E Wu and H Zeng Controlling passively quenched single photon detectors by bright light Vadim Makarov Information leakage via side channels in freespace BB84 quantum cryptography Sebastian Nauerth, Martin Fürst, Tobias Schmitt-Manderbach, Henning Weier and Harald Weinfurter Standardization of quantum key distribution and the ETSI standardization initiative ISG-QKD Thomas Länger and Gaby Lenhart Entangled quantum key distribution with a biased basis choice Chris Erven, Xiongfeng Ma, Raymond Laflamme and Gregor Weihs Finite-key analysis for practical implementations of quantum key distribution Raymond Y Q Cai and Valerio Scarani Field test of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution prototype S Fossier, E Diamanti, T Debuisschert, A Villing, R Tualle-Brouri and P Grangier Physics and application of photon number resolving detectors based on superconducting parallel nanowires F Marsili, D Bitauld, A Gaggero, S Jahanmirinejad, R Leoni, F Mattioli and A Fiore Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks Stefano Pironio, Antonio Acín, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Serge Massar and Valerio Scarani 1310 nm differential-phase-shift QKD system using superconducting single-photon detectors Lijun Ma, S Nam, Hai Xu, B Baek, Tiejun Chang, O Slattery, A Mink and Xiao Tang Practical gigahertz quantum key distribution based on avalanche photodiodes Z L Yuan, A R Dixon, J F Dynes, A W Sharpe and A J Shields Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity M Koashi Feasibility of satellite quantum key distribution C Bonato, A Tomaello, V Da Deppo, G Naletto and P Villoresi Programmable instrumentation and gigahertz signaling for single-photon quantum communication systems Alan Mink, Joshua C Bienfang, Robert Carpenter, Lijun Ma, Barry Hershman, Alessandro Restelli and Xiao Tang Experimental polarization encoded quantum key distribution over optical fibres with real-time continuous birefringence compensation G B Xavier, N Walenta, G Vilela de Faria, G P Temporão, N Gisin, H Zbinden and J P von der Weid Feasibility of free space quantum key distribution with coherent polarization states D Elser, T Bartley, B Heim, Ch Wittmann, D Sych and G Leuchs A fully automated entanglement-based quantum cryptography system for telecom fiber networks Alexander Treiber, Andreas Poppe, Michael Hentschel, Daniele Ferrini, Thomas Lorünser, Edwin Querasser, Thomas Matyus, Hannes Hübel and Anton Zeilinger Dense wavelength multiplexing of 1550 nm QKD with strong classical channels in reconfigurable networking environments N A Peters, P Toliver, T E Chapuran, R J Runser, S R McNown, C G Peterson, D Rosenberg, N Dallmann, R J Hughes, K P McCabe, J E Nordholt and K T Tyagi Clock synchronization by remote detection of correlated photon pairs Caleb Ho, Antía Lamas-Linares and Christian Kurtsiefer Megabits secure key rate quantum key distribution Q Zhang, H Takesue, T Honjo, K Wen, T Hirohata, M Suyama, Y Takiguchi, H Kamada, Y Tokura, O Tadanaga, Y Nishida, M Asobe and Y Yamamoto Practical long-distance quantum key distribution system using decoy levels D Rosenberg, C G Peterson, J W Harrington, P R Rice, N Dallmann, K T Tyagi, K P McCabe, S Nam, B Baek, R H Hadfield, R J Hughes and J E Nordholt Detector decoy quantum key distribution Tobias Moroder, Marcos Curty and Norbert Lütkenhaus Daylight operation of a free space, entanglement-based quantum key distribution system Matthew P Peloso, Ilja Gerhardt, Caleb Ho, Antía Lamas-Linares and Christian Kurtsiefer Observation of 1.5 μm band entanglement using single photon detectors based on sinusoidally gated InGaAs/InP avalanche photodiodes Benjamin Miquel and Hiroki Takesue

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045005

Related papers

Focus on Quantum Cryptography

Paul G. Kwiat

In our modern era of telecommunications and the Internet, information has become a valuable commodity. Sometimes it must therefore be protected against theft - in this case, loss of secret information to an eavesdropper. Most of today's transactions are protected using encryption unproven to be secure against a computational attack by a classical computer and, in fact, the standardly used encryption algorithms are provably vulnerable to the mind-boggling parallelism of a quantum computer, should one ever be physically realized. Enter quantum cryptography. Underlying nearly all forms of encryption is the necessity for a truly secret key, a random string of zeros and ones; the basic notion of quantum cryptography is to employ single photon transmissions (or the closest attainable approximation to these) to distribute the random key material, while removing the threat of an undetected eavesdropper. Now, nearly twenty years since the seminal quantum cryptography paper by Bennett and Brassard (Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (Bangalore) (New York: IEEE) pp 175-9), we take a look at several state-of-the-art implementations, and glimpse how future quantum cryptosystems might look. We start with papers from three of the world's leading experimental quantum cryptography efforts: Stucki et al and Bethune and Risk describe working systems for quantum key distribution (QKD) over telecommunications fibres (at 1550 nanometres and 1300 nanometres, respectively). The former's achievement of quantum key exchange over 67 kilometres of optical fibre is a world record, as is the experimental demonstration by Hughes et al of daylight free-space QKD over a 10 km atmospheric range. Next, Lütkenhaus and Jahma explore the possible vulnerabilities of such systems (which employ attenuated laser pulses instead of actual single photon states) to conceivable future eavesdropping technologies. Enzer et al have implemented a totally new protocol, using polarization-entangled photons, which in some circumstances can tolerate higher error rates than the traditional one of Bennett and Brassard; moreover, the use of entanglement provides a means of `automatic source verification'. Finally, looking to the future, Elliott gives a provocative view of how these technologies may be merged into network operation, and Shapiro describes a method to combine a novel source of entangled photons with a means to transfer the photons' quantum state to trapped-atom quantum memories. If realized, these systems could presage the world's first quantum network. Focus on Quantum Cryptography Contents Quantum key distribution over 67 km with a plug&play system D Stucki, N Gisin, O Guinnard, G Ribordy and H Zbinden Autocompensating quantum cryptography Donald S Bethune and William P Risk Practical free-space quantum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night Richard J Hughes, Jane E Nordholt, Derek Derkacs and Charles G Peterson Quantum key distribution with realistic states: photon-number statistics in the photon-number splitting attack Norbert Lütkenhaus and Mika Jahma Entangled-photon six-state quantum cryptography Daphna G Enzer, Phillip G Hadley, Richard J Hughes, Charles G Peterson and Paul G Kwiat Building the quantum network Chip Elliott Architectures for long-distance quantum teleportation Jeffrey H Shapiro Ground to satellite secure key exchange using quantum cryptography J G Rarity, P R Tapster, P M Gorman and P Knight Method for decoupling error correction from privacy amplification Hoi-Kwong Lo Paul G Kwiat University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

New Journal of Physics•Jul 12, 2002•9 citations

Quantum cryptography: Theoretical foundations and practical implementations for the protection of critical infrastructure

Ihor Limar, Євген СЕВАСТЄЄВ

The purpose of the article was to theoretically determine harmonised criteria for the applicability of quantum key distribution for the protection of critical infrastructure, taking into account the long-term risk of decryption by adversaries possessing quantum computational resources and traffic archiving capabilities. The methodology relied on a theoretical systems analysis of three Quantum Key Distribution subsystems – sources, detectors, and channels (fibre/free space) – complemented by simplified models of the link budget and bit error probability. A concise scenario analysis was conducted for banking networks, energy systems, and government communications, taking into account scalability, compatibility, and cost. The main results showed that laser intensity stability of 1-2% and higher detector efficiencies – 60-70% for Avalanche Photodiodes and 80-90% for Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors – extended practical distances and reduced errors. Without trusted nodes in fibre, 150-200 km was achievable; for urban Free-Space Optics lines, 5-20 km was optimal, while longer distances required network segmentation or satellite segments. Architecturally, it was justified that: for banks – rings with trusted nodes and Free-Space Optics reserve; for energy systems – dual fibre channels “control centre-substation” with a local key cache; for government communications – segmented domains with interagency gateways and satellite redundancy. In all scenarios, a Quantum Key Distribution + Post-Quantum Cryptography hybrid with short key rotation and operational countermeasures against attacks on detectors and channels was appropriate, confirming practical suitability for urban and regional networks. The practical significance lay in providing engineering teams in banking, energy, and government communications with ready-made architectural profiles – from rings and dual fibre channels to segmented domains – with Key Management System/Hardware Security Module integration, definition of Service Level Objective/Service Level Agreement, and phased roadmaps. For regulators and operators, this formed a basis for updating requirements and audits, as well as for planning redundancy (Free-Space Optics/satellite) and Total Cost of Ownership categories

Naukovij žurnal «Tehnìka ta energetika»•Aug 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Cryptography: From Theory to Practice

Xiongfeng Ma

Quantum cryptography or quantum key distribution (QKD) applies fundamental laws of quantum physics to guarantee secure communication. The security of quantum cryptography was proven in the last decade. Many security analyses are based on the assumption that QKD system components are idealized. In practice, inevitable device imperfections may compromise security unless these imperfections are well investigated.\n\nA highly attenuated laser pulse which gives a weak coherent state is widely used in QKD experiments. A weak coherent state has multi-photon components, which opens up a security loophole to the sophisticated eavesdropper. With a small adjustment of the hardware, we will prove that the decoy state method can close this loophole and substantially improve the QKD performance. We also propose a few practical decoy state protocols, study statistical fluctuations and perform experimental demonstrations. Moreover, we will apply the methods from entanglement distillation protocols based on two-way classical communication to improve the decoy state QKD performance. Furthermore, we study the decoy state methods for other single photon sources, such as triggering parametric down-conversion (PDC) source. Note that our work, decoy state protocol, has attracted a lot of scientific and media interest. The decoy state QKD becomes a standard technique for prepare-and-measure QKD schemes.\n\nAside from single-photon-based QKD schemes, there is another type of scheme based on entangled photon sources. A PDC source is commonly used as an entangled photon source. We propose a model and post-processing scheme for the entanglement-based QKD with a PDC source. Although the model is proposed to study the entanglement-based QKD, we emphasize that our generic model may also be useful for other non-QKD experiments involving a PDC source. By simulating a real PDC experiment, we show that the entanglement-based QKD can achieve longer maximal secure distance than the single-photon-based QKD schemes.\n\nWe propose a time-shift attack that exploits the efficiency mismatch of two single photon detectors in a QKD system. This eavesdropping strategy can be realized by current technology. We will also discuss counter measures against the attack and study the security of a QKD system with efficiency mismatch detectors.

•Feb 26, 2009•21 citations

Introduction to quantum cryptography

Richard Hughes

ide'Following their 1984 invention of quantum key distribution (QKD), Bennett and Brassard and colleagues perfonned a proof-of-principle QKD transmission over a 32-cm air path in 1991.This seminal experiment led other researchers to explore implementations ofQKD in optical fibers and over line-of-sight outdoor atmospheric paths ("freespace"), resulting in dramatic increases in range, secret bit rate, security and availability.These advances have led to, and been enabled by, improvements in sources, single-photon detectors and the deeper understanding ofQKD security with practical sources and detectors in the presence of transmission loss and channel noise.Today, QKD has been implemented with unconditional security over ranges greater than lOOkm, over multi-kilometer distances in high background environments in both fiber and free-space, and at high (GHz) clock rates over shorter distances.In this course we will review the key enabling advances underlying these developments of experimental optical fiber and free-space QKD over the past 16 years, describe the present status of the field, and compare and contrast different approaches to implementing security against photon number splitting attacks.We will describe some recent results from QKD in dedicated ("dark") optical fiber using ultra-high efficiency, low-noise transition edge sensor (TES) photo-detectors, achieving ultra-long transmission distances, and unconditional security over I07km through the use of a decoy-state protocol.We will also describe progress in maki ng QKD compatible with all-optical fiber networks, including the co-existence ofQKD signals with conventional optical data on the same fiber.We will conclude with a survey of the prospects fo r QKD transmission distances exceeding 200km, which will include a comparison of the various single-photon detector technologies now becoming available for quantum communications.

•Mar 4, 2011•0 citations

Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Dipan Kumar Das, Padmaja Patnaik, Sudip Kumar Das

Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a straightforward cryptographic protocol for secure communication using quantum mechanics principles. This book chapter provides an introduction to QKD protocols based on theoretical principles, applicability, and recent advancements. The chapter provides an overview of the most popular BB84 protocol and its extensions, including measurement-device-independent QKD (MDI-QKD) and twin-field QKD (TF-QKD). The chapter includes continuous-variable QKD (CV-QKD) and its applicability to real networks. Security attacks, including side-channel attacks and photon-number splitting (PNS) attacks, are addressed with a focus on countermeasures, including decoy-state techniques and device-independent protocols. Application of QKD for network security, cloud computing, and critical infrastructure is addressed. Integration of QKD with classical cryptography techniques, post-quantum cryptography, and innovative quantum network topologies is addressed to investigate applicability for large-scale implementation. The chapter discusses recent advancements in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, quantum memory-assisted QKD, and free-space QKD in atmospheric channels. It also discusses innovative reconciliation techniques, authentication schemes, future developments, and deployment challenges and provides valuable information for researchers and practitioners.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 2, 2026•0 citations

Practical Quantum Cryptographic Architecture: A Perspective Approach

Srinivasa Rao Gundu, Panem Charanarur, Biswadip Basu Mallik

We now have a safe way to communicate, thanks to quantum key distribution (QKD). In recent years there have been the emergence of brand-new challenges in the realm of QKD. Let us take a look at the analysis of the study on the topic of QKD. This research informs us that protected keys cannot be created when a weaker laser is used as the source of the photons, so let us look at that. The sequential unambiguous state discrimination (USD) attack, a variation of the photon number splitting (PNS) attack, is at fault for this issue. The mechanism used to generate keys must have a higher security level. An experiment based on superconducting single photon detector (SSPD) was reported, in which a differential phase shift of 10 GHz was applied to a clock utilized for QKD. We can produce protected keys using a 10-GHz clock system due to the minimal timing jitter and low 2 dark count rate provided by the SSPD. For us to scatter protected keys against sequential USD attacks across 200 km of fiber with a channel loss of 42.1 dB and general collective attacks for single photons, we needed to use thread. In addition, the protected key rate that we accomplished at 105 km was 17 kilobits per second, far greater than the previous record by two orders of magnitude. If we could do this, it would be a significant step forward in our capacity to understand the interrelationships of cities in real time. Installation of a QKD system and a worldwide QKD system using geostationary satellites. It is essential to consider that the 30-35 dB channel loss is enough for most geo-synchronized satellites.

Apple Academic Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations
Quantum cryptography, and especially quantum key distribution (QKD), is steadily progressing to become a viable tool for cryptographic services. In recent years we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the secure bit rate of QKD, as well as its extension to ever longer fibre- and air-based links and the emergence of metro-scale trusted networks. In the foreseeable future even global-scale communications may be possible using quantum repeaters or Earth–satellite links. A handful of start-ups and some bigger companies are already active in the field. The launch of an initiative to form industrial standards for QKD, under the auspices of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute, described in the paper by Laenger and Lenhart in this Focus Issue, can be taken as a sign of the growing commercial interest. Recent progress has seen an increase in the secure bit rate of QKD links, by orders of magnitude, to over 1 Mb s −1 . This has resulted mainly from an improvement in the detection technology. Here changes in the way conventional semiconductor detectors are gated, as well as the development of novel devices based on non-linear processes and superconducting materials, are leading the way. Additional challenges for QKD at GHz clock rates include the design of high speed electronics, remote synchronization and high rate random number generation. Substantial effort is being devoted to increasing the range of individual links, which is limited by attenuation and other losses in optical fibres and air links. An important advance in the past few years has been the introduction of protocols with the same scaling as an ideal single-photon set-up. The good news is that these schemes use standard optical devices, such as weak laser pulses. Thanks to these new protocols and improvements in the detection technology, the range of a single fibre link can exceed a few hundred km. Outstanding issues include proving the unconditional security of some of the schemes. Much of the work done to date relates to point-to-point links. Another recent advance has been the development of trusted networks for QKD. This is important for further increasing the range of the technology, and for overcoming denial-of-service attacks on an individual link. It is interesting to see that the optimization of QKD devices differs for point-to-point and network applications. Network operation is essential for widespread adoption of the technology, as it can dramatically reduce the deployment costs and allow connection flexibility. Also important is the multiplexing of the quantum signals with conventional network traffic. For the future, quantum repeaters should be developed for longer range links. On the theoretical side, different approaches to security proofs have recently started to converge, offering several paradigms of the same basic idea. Our improved theoretical understanding places more stringent demands on the QKD devices. We are aware by now that finite size effects in key generation arise not only from parameter estimation. It will not be possible to generate a key from just a few hundred received signals. It is a stimulating challenge for the theory of security proofs to develop lean proof strategies that work with finite signal block sizes. As QKD advances to a real-world cryptographic solution, side channel attacks must be carefully analysed. Theoretical security proofs for QKD schemes are so far based on physical models of these devices. It is in the nature of models that any real implementation will deviate from this model, creating a potential weakness for an eavesdropper to exploit. There are two solutions to this problem: the traditional path of refining the models to reduce the deviations, or the radically different approach of device-independent security proofs, in which none or only a few well controlled assumptions about the devices are made. Clearly, it is desirable to find security proofs that require only minimal or fairly general model descriptions and are based on observable tests during the run of QKD sessions. It is now 25 years since the first proposal for QKD was published and 20 since the first experimental realization. The intervening years have brought several technological and theoretical advances, which have driven new insights into the application of quantum theory to the wider field of information technology. We are looking forward to the new twists and turns this field will take in the next 25 years! Focus on Quantum Cryptography: Theory and Practice Contents Security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution: towards a de Finetti theorem for rotation symmetry in phase space A Leverrier, E Karpov, P Grangier and N J Cerf Optical networking for quantum key distribution and quantum communications T E Chapuran, P Toliver, N A Peters, J Jackel, M S Goodman, R J Runser, S R McNown, N Dallmann, R J Hughes, K P McCabe, J E Nordholt, C G Peterson, K T Tyagi, L Mercer and H Dardy Proof-of-concept of real-world quantum key distribution with quantum frames I Lucio-Martinez, P Chan, X Mo, S Hosier and W Tittel Composability in quantum cryptography Jörn Müller-Quade and Renato Renner Distributed authentication for randomly compromised networks Travis R Beals, Kevin P Hynes and Barry C Sanders Feasibility of 300 km quantum key distribution with entangled states Thomas Scheidl, Rupert Ursin, Alessandro Fedrizzi, Sven Ramelow, Xiao-Song Ma, Thomas Herbst, Robert Prevedel, Lothar Ratschbacher, Johannes Kofler, Thomas Jennewein and Anton Zeilinger Decoy-state quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations Xiang-Bin Wang, Lin Yang, Cheng-Zhi Peng and Jian-Wei Pan High rate, long-distance quantum key distribution over 250 km of ultra low loss fibres D Stucki, N Walenta, F Vannel, R T Thew, N Gisin, H Zbinden, S Gray, C R Towery and S Ten Topological optimization of quantum key distribution networks R Alléaume, F Roueff, E Diamanti and N Lütkenhaus The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna M Peev, C Pacher, R Alléaume, C Barreiro, J Bouda, W Boxleitner, T Debuisschert, E Diamanti, M Dianati, J F Dynes, S Fasel, S Fossier, M Fürst, J-D Gautier, O Gay, N Gisin, P Grangier, A Happe, Y Hasani, M Hentschel, H Hübel, G Humer, T Länger, M Legré, R Lieger, J Lodewyck, T Lorünser, N Lütkenhaus, A Marhold, T Matyus, O Maurhart, L Monat, S Nauerth, J-B Page, A Poppe, E Querasser, G Ribordy, S Robyr, L Salvail, A W Sharpe, A J Shields, D Stucki, M Suda, C Tamas, T Themel, R T Thew, Y Thoma, A Treiber, P Trinkler, R Tualle-Brouri, F Vannel, N Walenta, H Weier, H Weinfurter, I Wimberger, Z L Yuan, H Zbinden and A Zeilinger Stable quantum key distribution with active polarization control based on time-division multiplexing J Chen, G Wu, L Xu, X Gu, E Wu and H Zeng Controlling passively quenched single photon detectors by bright light Vadim Makarov Information leakage via side channels in freespace BB84 quantum cryptography Sebastian Nauerth, Martin Fürst, Tobias Schmitt-Manderbach, Henning Weier and Harald Weinfurter Standardization of quantum key distribution and the ETSI standardization initiative ISG-QKD Thomas Länger and Gaby Lenhart Entangled quantum key distribution with a biased basis choice Chris Erven, Xiongfeng Ma, Raymond Laflamme and Gregor Weihs Finite-key analysis for practical implementations of quantum key distribution Raymond Y Q Cai and Valerio Scarani Field test of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution prototype S Fossier, E Diamanti, T Debuisschert, A Villing, R Tualle-Brouri and P Grangier Physics and application of photon number resolving detectors based on superconducting parallel nanowires F Marsili, D Bitauld, A Gaggero, S Jahanmirinejad, R Leoni, F Mattioli and A Fiore Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks Stefano Pironio, Antonio Acín, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Serge Massar and Valerio Scarani 1310 nm differential-phase-shift QKD system using superconducting single-photon detectors Lijun Ma, S Nam, Hai Xu, B Baek, Tiejun Chang, O Slattery, A Mink and Xiao Tang Practical gigahertz quantum key distribution based on avalanche photodiodes Z L Yuan, A R Dixon, J F Dynes, A W Sharpe and A J Shields Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity M Koashi Feasibility of satellite quantum key distribution C Bonato, A Tomaello, V Da Deppo, G Naletto and P Villoresi Programmable instrumentation and gigahertz signaling for single-photon quantum communication systems Alan Mink, Joshua C Bienfang, Robert Carpenter, Lijun Ma, Barry Hershman, Alessandro Restelli and Xiao Tang Experimental polarization encoded quantum key distribution over optical fibres with real-time continuous birefringence compensation G B Xavier, N Walenta, G Vilela de Faria, G P Temporão, N Gisin, H Zbinden and J P von der Weid Feasibility of free space quantum key distribution with coherent polarization states D Elser, T Bartley, B Heim, Ch Wittmann, D Sych and G Leuchs A fully automated entanglement-based quantum cryptography system for telecom fiber networks Alexander Treiber, Andreas Poppe, Michael Hentschel, Daniele Ferrini, Thomas Lorünser, Edwin Querasser, Thomas Matyus, Hannes Hübel and Anton Zeilinger Dense wavelength multiplexing of 1550 nm QKD with strong classical channels in reconfigurable networking environments N A Peters, P Toliver, T E Chapuran, R J Runser, S R McNown, C G Peterson, D Rosenberg, N Dallmann, R J Hughes, K P McCabe, J E Nordholt and K T Tyagi Clock synchronization by remote detection of correlated photon pairs Caleb Ho, Antía Lamas-Linares and Christian Kurtsiefer Megabits secure key rate quantum key distribution Q Zhang, H Takesue, T Honjo, K Wen, T Hirohata, M Suyama, Y Takiguchi, H Kamada, Y Tokura, O Tadanaga, Y Nishida, M Asobe and Y Yamamoto Practical long-distance quantum key distribution system using decoy levels D Rosenberg, C G Peterson, J W Harrington, P R Rice, N Dallmann, K T Tyagi, K P McCabe, S Nam, B Baek, R H Hadfield, R J Hughes and J E Nordholt Detector decoy quantum key distribution Tobias Moroder, Marcos Curty and Norbert Lütkenhaus Daylight operation of a free space, entanglement-based quantum key distribution system Matthew P Peloso, Ilja Gerhardt, Caleb Ho, Antía Lamas-Linares and Christian Kurtsiefer Observation of 1.5 μm band entanglement using single photon detectors based on sinusoidally gated InGaAs/InP avalanche photodiodes Benjamin Miquel and Hiroki Takesue
In our modern era of telecommunications and the Internet, information has become a valuable commodity. Sometimes it must therefore be protected against theft - in this case, loss of secret information to an eavesdropper. Most of today's transactions are protected using encryption unproven to be secure against a computational attack by a classical computer and, in fact, the standardly used encryption algorithms are provably vulnerable to the mind-boggling parallelism of a quantum computer, should one ever be physically realized. Enter quantum cryptography. Underlying nearly all forms of encryption is the necessity for a truly secret key, a random string of zeros and ones; the basic notion of quantum cryptography is to employ single photon transmissions (or the closest attainable approximation to these) to distribute the random key material, while removing the threat of an undetected eavesdropper. Now, nearly twenty years since the seminal quantum cryptography paper by Bennett and Brassard (Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (Bangalore) (New York: IEEE) pp 175-9), we take a look at several state-of-the-art implementations, and glimpse how future quantum cryptosystems might look. We start with papers from three of the world's leading experimental quantum cryptography efforts: Stucki et al and Bethune and Risk describe working systems for quantum key distribution (QKD) over telecommunications fibres (at 1550 nanometres and 1300 nanometres, respectively). The former's achievement of quantum key exchange over 67 kilometres of optical fibre is a world record, as is the experimental demonstration by Hughes et al of daylight free-space QKD over a 10 km atmospheric range. Next, Lütkenhaus and Jahma explore the possible vulnerabilities of such systems (which employ attenuated laser pulses instead of actual single photon states) to conceivable future eavesdropping technologies. Enzer et al have implemented a totally new protocol, using polarization-entangled photons, which in some circumstances can tolerate higher error rates than the traditional one of Bennett and Brassard; moreover, the use of entanglement provides a means of `automatic source verification'. Finally, looking to the future, Elliott gives a provocative view of how these technologies may be merged into network operation, and Shapiro describes a method to combine a novel source of entangled photons with a means to transfer the photons' quantum state to trapped-atom quantum memories. If realized, these systems could presage the world's first quantum network. Focus on Quantum Cryptography Contents Quantum key distribution over 67 km with a plug&play system D Stucki, N Gisin, O Guinnard, G Ribordy and H Zbinden Autocompensating quantum cryptography Donald S Bethune and William P Risk Practical free-space quantum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night Richard J Hughes, Jane E Nordholt, Derek Derkacs and Charles G Peterson Quantum key distribution with realistic states: photon-number statistics in the photon-number splitting attack Norbert Lütkenhaus and Mika Jahma Entangled-photon six-state quantum cryptography Daphna G Enzer, Phillip G Hadley, Richard J Hughes, Charles G Peterson and Paul G Kwiat Building the quantum network Chip Elliott Architectures for long-distance quantum teleportation Jeffrey H Shapiro Ground to satellite secure key exchange using quantum cryptography J G Rarity, P R Tapster, P M Gorman and P Knight Method for decoupling error correction from privacy amplification Hoi-Kwong Lo Paul G Kwiat University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
The purpose of the article was to theoretically determine harmonised criteria for the applicability of quantum key distribution for the protection of critical infrastructure, taking into account the long-term risk of decryption by adversaries possessing quantum computational resources and traffic archiving capabilities. The methodology relied on a theoretical systems analysis of three Quantum Key Distribution subsystems – sources, detectors, and channels (fibre/free space) – complemented by simplified models of the link budget and bit error probability. A concise scenario analysis was conducted for banking networks, energy systems, and government communications, taking into account scalability, compatibility, and cost. The main results showed that laser intensity stability of 1-2% and higher detector efficiencies – 60-70% for Avalanche Photodiodes and 80-90% for Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors – extended practical distances and reduced errors. Without trusted nodes in fibre, 150-200 km was achievable; for urban Free-Space Optics lines, 5-20 km was optimal, while longer distances required network segmentation or satellite segments. Architecturally, it was justified that: for banks – rings with trusted nodes and Free-Space Optics reserve; for energy systems – dual fibre channels “control centre-substation” with a local key cache; for government communications – segmented domains with interagency gateways and satellite redundancy. In all scenarios, a Quantum Key Distribution + Post-Quantum Cryptography hybrid with short key rotation and operational countermeasures against attacks on detectors and channels was appropriate, confirming practical suitability for urban and regional networks. The practical significance lay in providing engineering teams in banking, energy, and government communications with ready-made architectural profiles – from rings and dual fibre channels to segmented domains – with Key Management System/Hardware Security Module integration, definition of Service Level Objective/Service Level Agreement, and phased roadmaps. For regulators and operators, this formed a basis for updating requirements and audits, as well as for planning redundancy (Free-Space Optics/satellite) and Total Cost of Ownership categories
Quantum cryptography or quantum key distribution (QKD) applies fundamental laws of quantum physics to guarantee secure communication. The security of quantum cryptography was proven in the last decade. Many security analyses are based on the assumption that QKD system components are idealized. In practice, inevitable device imperfections may compromise security unless these imperfections are well investigated.\n\nA highly attenuated laser pulse which gives a weak coherent state is widely used in QKD experiments. A weak coherent state has multi-photon components, which opens up a security loophole to the sophisticated eavesdropper. With a small adjustment of the hardware, we will prove that the decoy state method can close this loophole and substantially improve the QKD performance. We also propose a few practical decoy state protocols, study statistical fluctuations and perform experimental demonstrations. Moreover, we will apply the methods from entanglement distillation protocols based on two-way classical communication to improve the decoy state QKD performance. Furthermore, we study the decoy state methods for other single photon sources, such as triggering parametric down-conversion (PDC) source. Note that our work, decoy state protocol, has attracted a lot of scientific and media interest. The decoy state QKD becomes a standard technique for prepare-and-measure QKD schemes.\n\nAside from single-photon-based QKD schemes, there is another type of scheme based on entangled photon sources. A PDC source is commonly used as an entangled photon source. We propose a model and post-processing scheme for the entanglement-based QKD with a PDC source. Although the model is proposed to study the entanglement-based QKD, we emphasize that our generic model may also be useful for other non-QKD experiments involving a PDC source. By simulating a real PDC experiment, we show that the entanglement-based QKD can achieve longer maximal secure distance than the single-photon-based QKD schemes.\n\nWe propose a time-shift attack that exploits the efficiency mismatch of two single photon detectors in a QKD system. This eavesdropping strategy can be realized by current technology. We will also discuss counter measures against the attack and study the security of a QKD system with efficiency mismatch detectors.
ide'Following their 1984 invention of quantum key distribution (QKD), Bennett and Brassard and colleagues perfonned a proof-of-principle QKD transmission over a 32-cm air path in 1991.This seminal experiment led other researchers to explore implementations ofQKD in optical fibers and over line-of-sight outdoor atmospheric paths ("freespace"), resulting in dramatic increases in range, secret bit rate, security and availability.These advances have led to, and been enabled by, improvements in sources, single-photon detectors and the deeper understanding ofQKD security with practical sources and detectors in the presence of transmission loss and channel noise.Today, QKD has been implemented with unconditional security over ranges greater than lOOkm, over multi-kilometer distances in high background environments in both fiber and free-space, and at high (GHz) clock rates over shorter distances.In this course we will review the key enabling advances underlying these developments of experimental optical fiber and free-space QKD over the past 16 years, describe the present status of the field, and compare and contrast different approaches to implementing security against photon number splitting attacks.We will describe some recent results from QKD in dedicated ("dark") optical fiber using ultra-high efficiency, low-noise transition edge sensor (TES) photo-detectors, achieving ultra-long transmission distances, and unconditional security over I07km through the use of a decoy-state protocol.We will also describe progress in maki ng QKD compatible with all-optical fiber networks, including the co-existence ofQKD signals with conventional optical data on the same fiber.We will conclude with a survey of the prospects fo r QKD transmission distances exceeding 200km, which will include a comparison of the various single-photon detector technologies now becoming available for quantum communications.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a straightforward cryptographic protocol for secure communication using quantum mechanics principles. This book chapter provides an introduction to QKD protocols based on theoretical principles, applicability, and recent advancements. The chapter provides an overview of the most popular BB84 protocol and its extensions, including measurement-device-independent QKD (MDI-QKD) and twin-field QKD (TF-QKD). The chapter includes continuous-variable QKD (CV-QKD) and its applicability to real networks. Security attacks, including side-channel attacks and photon-number splitting (PNS) attacks, are addressed with a focus on countermeasures, including decoy-state techniques and device-independent protocols. Application of QKD for network security, cloud computing, and critical infrastructure is addressed. Integration of QKD with classical cryptography techniques, post-quantum cryptography, and innovative quantum network topologies is addressed to investigate applicability for large-scale implementation. The chapter discusses recent advancements in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, quantum memory-assisted QKD, and free-space QKD in atmospheric channels. It also discusses innovative reconciliation techniques, authentication schemes, future developments, and deployment challenges and provides valuable information for researchers and practitioners.
We now have a safe way to communicate, thanks to quantum key distribution (QKD). In recent years there have been the emergence of brand-new challenges in the realm of QKD. Let us take a look at the analysis of the study on the topic of QKD. This research informs us that protected keys cannot be created when a weaker laser is used as the source of the photons, so let us look at that. The sequential unambiguous state discrimination (USD) attack, a variation of the photon number splitting (PNS) attack, is at fault for this issue. The mechanism used to generate keys must have a higher security level. An experiment based on superconducting single photon detector (SSPD) was reported, in which a differential phase shift of 10 GHz was applied to a clock utilized for QKD. We can produce protected keys using a 10-GHz clock system due to the minimal timing jitter and low 2 dark count rate provided by the SSPD. For us to scatter protected keys against sequential USD attacks across 200 km of fiber with a channel loss of 42.1 dB and general collective attacks for single photons, we needed to use thread. In addition, the protected key rate that we accomplished at 105 km was 17 kilobits per second, far greater than the previous record by two orders of magnitude. If we could do this, it would be a significant step forward in our capacity to understand the interrelationships of cities in real time. Installation of a QKD system and a worldwide QKD system using geostationary satellites. It is essential to consider that the 30-35 dB channel loss is enough for most geo-synchronized satellites.