Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Classical theory of radiative transitions

John Barwick

Published Jun 1, 1978• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A semiclassical method of approach to the origin of radiation in a simple quantum transition is reinterpreted and extended. The resulting concepts are applied to an analysis of the Compton effect, yielding the Klein-Nishina formula as usual. More significant is the natural appearance in this case of photonlike behavior of the purely classical electromagnetic fields. The same phenomenon can be hypothesized to occur in any transition in which a quantized-photon nature of radiation appears evident. A similar classical viewpoint taken toward the Lamb shift leads to a straightforward explanation which seems to give very good agreement with experiment. The calculated frequency for the $2{P}_{\frac{1}{2}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2{S}_{\frac{1}{2}}$ transition in H is 1064.57 MHz = 0.0355102 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. The argument also has some important implications for ideas about the physical nature of quantum states.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.17.1912

Related papers

QUANTUM THEORY OF RADIATION

Murray, Iii Sargent

In our preceding treatments of the interaction of radiation with matter, we assumed that the electric field is classical. In most cases, this assumption is validated by experiment. There are several instances, however, for which a classical field fails to give experimentally observed results, whereas a quantized field succeeds. This is true, for example, of spontaneous emission, a phenom­ enon which was described phenomenologically in our earlier work (see Chaps. 2 and 7). Another case involves the 2 and 2p \ states in the hydrogen atom, which are predicted to have the same energy not only by the simple theory of Chap. 1, but also by the more sophisticated Dirac theory. In both cases, a classical electric field was assumed. Experimentally, the two levels differ by approximately the Lamb shift, 1057 MHz. A fully quantized treatment of the field and atom system gives impressive agreement with the experimentally observed shift. Derivation of the fluctuations in intensity of a laser near threshold requires the quantum theory o f radiation. In addition there are other problems for which the concept of a “particle,” the photon, is either necessary or convenient. Despite a popular impression to the contrary, however the explanation of the photoelectric effect is not one of these (see Prob. 2-10).

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•869 citations

The concept of the photon

Marlan O. Scully, Murray Sargent

The idea of the photon has stirred the imaginations of physicists ever since 1905 when Einstein originally proposed the use of light quanta to explain the photoelectric effect. This concept is formalized in the quantum theory of radiation, which has had unfailing success in explaining the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter, seemingly limited only by the ability of physicists to perform the indicated calculations. Nevertheless, it has its conceptual problems—various infinities and frequent misinterpretations. Consequently an increasing number of workers are asking, “to what extent is the quantized field really necessary and useful?” In fact the experimental results of the photoelectric effect were explained by G. Wentzel in 1927 without the quantum theory of radiation. Similarly most electro-optic phenomena such as stimulated emission, reaction of the emitted field on the emitting atom, resonance fluorescence, and so on, do not require the quantization of the field for their explanation. As we will see, these processes can all be quantitatively explained and physically understood in terms of the semiclassical theory of the matter–field interaction in which the electric field is treated classically while the atoms obey the laws of quantum mechanics. The quantized field is fundamentally required for accurate descriptions of certain processes involving fluctuations in the electromagnetic field: for example, spontaneous emission, the Lamb shift, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and certain aspects of blackbody radiation. (The Compton effect also fits here, but see later under references 8b and c.) Here we will outline how the photon concept originated and developed, where it is not required and is often misused, and finally where it plays an essential role in the understanding of physical phenomena. In our discussion we will attempt to give a logically consistent definition of the word “photon”—a statement far more necessary than one might think, for so many contradictory uses exist of this elusive beast. In particular consider the original coining of the word by G. N. Lewis: “[because it appears to spend] only a minute fraction of its existence as a carrier of radiant energy, while the rest of the time it remains an important structural element within the atom…, I therefore take the liberty of proposing for this hypothetical new atom which is not light but plays an essential part in every process of radiation, the name photon!” (our exclamation point). Clearly the present usage of the word is very different.

Physics Today•Mar 1, 1972•146 citations

Radiative Effects in Semiclassical Theory

Michael D. Crisp, E. T. Jaynes

Unquantized field calculations are extended to include the effect of an atom's field acting back upon the atom. It is shown that, in the absence of an applied field, semiclassical theory predicts that an atom will decay spontaneously from an excited state with a characteristic time equal to the reciprocal of the Einstein $A$ coefficient for the transition. The theory also predicts that the frequency of the light radiated during a transition will have a small time dependence. The corresponding frequency shifts are compared with the Lamb shift in hydrogen. The derived equations are used to study the response of a many-level atom to an applied, monochromatic field. In the case of a three-level system, it is predicted that optical nutations are not just limited to the resonant transition, but are also present in the fluorescence involving the other level.

Physical Review•Mar 25, 1969•211 citations

Self-fields in semiclassical radiation theory

Michael D. Crisp

The interaction of an atomic system with an unquantized electromagnetic field is studied by means of the Heisenberg-operator equations of motion. The electromagnetic fields created by the atom are taken into account by assuming that the charge and probability current densities are the actual charge and current source terms in Maxwell's equation. When Ehrenfest's theorem is written to order (1/c${)}^{2}$, the equations of motion are found to have a constant of motion that can be interpreted as stating that the sum of the atomic energy, energy of interaction, and energy stored in the electromagnetic field is constant. This constant of integration can be expressed as an expectation of a new semiclassical Hamiltonian that now includes the effects of the atomic self-fields to order 1/${\mathit{c}}^{2}$. This Hamiltonian is related to the classical Darwin Lagrangian. Since the new approximate Hamiltonian is the sum of an atomic and a field Hamiltonian, it provides a formulation of semiclassical radiation theory that is formally close to the usual formulation of quantum electrodynamics. A Schr\"odinger equation can be derived by applying the variational principle to the expectation of the new Hamiltonian. The result is a nonlinear integro-differential equation, in \ensuremath{\Psi}, which is somewhat similar to Hartree's self-consistent equation for a multielectron atom.When the Heisenberg equations are written to include the next-higher-order terms, 1/${\mathit{c}}^{3}$, it is found that the total energy of the atom and the electromagnetic field in the vicinity of the atom decreases at a rate that is given by the Larmor power formula (2${\mathit{e}}^{2}$/3${\mathit{c}}^{3}$)(d〈v〉/dt${)}^{2}$, where 〈v〉 is the quantum-mechanical expectation of the electron's velocity operator. This approximate formulation of semiclassical radiation theory is applied to semiclassical calculations of atomic radiative shifts. It is then shown that, if some retardation effects are included to all orders of 1/c in the vector potential, the semiclassical analysis provides a formula for radiative energy-level shifts that are time dependent and that contain coefficients similar to the starting point of the Bethe calculation of the Lamb shift. The incorporation of mass renormalization in semiclassical theory is then discussed.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1990•17 citations

Spontaneous emission

P. van der Straten, Harold J. Metcalf

Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2015•0 citations

The photon of the quantized electromagnetic field

Ole Keller

According to modern quantum field theory all elementary particles are quantum excitations of an underlying quantum field. In the case of the photon the underlying field is the electromagnetic field. In photon wave mechanics the photon concept was reached by a reinterpretation of the physical meaning of the free classical electromagnetic field. Such a reinterpretation does not give us a quantum theory of light quanta because the elementary quantum of action is foreign to classical physics. Although Planck’s constant does occur in the various Schro¨dinger-like wave equations we have presented in Part III it just plays the role of a multiplicative factor, see e.g., Eq. (10.36). The “justification” for bringing ~ into the formalism is the wish to make contact to the Einstein-de Broglie relations [Eqs. (10.40) and (10.41)]. In a sense one may call the light particle appearing from classical electrodynamics the classical photon.

CRC Press eBooks•May 13, 2014•0 citations
A semiclassical method of approach to the origin of radiation in a simple quantum transition is reinterpreted and extended. The resulting concepts are applied to an analysis of the Compton effect, yielding the Klein-Nishina formula as usual. More significant is the natural appearance in this case of photonlike behavior of the purely classical electromagnetic fields. The same phenomenon can be hypothesized to occur in any transition in which a quantized-photon nature of radiation appears evident. A similar classical viewpoint taken toward the Lamb shift leads to a straightforward explanation which seems to give very good agreement with experiment. The calculated frequency for the 2P12\ensuremath→2S122{P}_{\frac{1}{2}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2{S}_{\frac{1}{2}}2P21​​\ensuremath→2S21​​ transition in H is 1064.57 MHz = 0.0355102 cm\ensuremath−1{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}cm\ensuremath−1. The argument also has some important implications for ideas about the physical nature of quantum states.
In our preceding treatments of the interaction of radiation with matter, we assumed that the electric field is classical. In most cases, this assumption is validated by experiment. There are several instances, however, for which a classical field fails to give experimentally observed results, whereas a quantized field succeeds. This is true, for example, of spontaneous emission, a phenom­ enon which was described phenomenologically in our earlier work (see Chaps. 2 and 7). Another case involves the 2 and 2p \ states in the hydrogen atom, which are predicted to have the same energy not only by the simple theory of Chap. 1, but also by the more sophisticated Dirac theory. In both cases, a classical electric field was assumed. Experimentally, the two levels differ by approximately the Lamb shift, 1057 MHz. A fully quantized treatment of the field and atom system gives impressive agreement with the experimentally observed shift. Derivation of the fluctuations in intensity of a laser near threshold requires the quantum theory o f radiation. In addition there are other problems for which the concept of a “particle,” the photon, is either necessary or convenient. Despite a popular impression to the contrary, however the explanation of the photoelectric effect is not one of these (see Prob. 2-10).
The idea of the photon has stirred the imaginations of physicists ever since 1905 when Einstein originally proposed the use of light quanta to explain the photoelectric effect. This concept is formalized in the quantum theory of radiation, which has had unfailing success in explaining the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter, seemingly limited only by the ability of physicists to perform the indicated calculations. Nevertheless, it has its conceptual problems—various infinities and frequent misinterpretations. Consequently an increasing number of workers are asking, “to what extent is the quantized field really necessary and useful?” In fact the experimental results of the photoelectric effect were explained by G. Wentzel in 1927 without the quantum theory of radiation. Similarly most electro-optic phenomena such as stimulated emission, reaction of the emitted field on the emitting atom, resonance fluorescence, and so on, do not require the quantization of the field for their explanation. As we will see, these processes can all be quantitatively explained and physically understood in terms of the semiclassical theory of the matter–field interaction in which the electric field is treated classically while the atoms obey the laws of quantum mechanics. The quantized field is fundamentally required for accurate descriptions of certain processes involving fluctuations in the electromagnetic field: for example, spontaneous emission, the Lamb shift, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and certain aspects of blackbody radiation. (The Compton effect also fits here, but see later under references 8b and c.) Here we will outline how the photon concept originated and developed, where it is not required and is often misused, and finally where it plays an essential role in the understanding of physical phenomena. In our discussion we will attempt to give a logically consistent definition of the word “photon”—a statement far more necessary than one might think, for so many contradictory uses exist of this elusive beast. In particular consider the original coining of the word by G. N. Lewis: “[because it appears to spend] only a minute fraction of its existence as a carrier of radiant energy, while the rest of the time it remains an important structural element within the atom…, I therefore take the liberty of proposing for this hypothetical new atom which is not light but plays an essential part in every process of radiation, the name photon!” (our exclamation point). Clearly the present usage of the word is very different.
Unquantized field calculations are extended to include the effect of an atom's field acting back upon the atom. It is shown that, in the absence of an applied field, semiclassical theory predicts that an atom will decay spontaneously from an excited state with a characteristic time equal to the reciprocal of the Einstein AAA coefficient for the transition. The theory also predicts that the frequency of the light radiated during a transition will have a small time dependence. The corresponding frequency shifts are compared with the Lamb shift in hydrogen. The derived equations are used to study the response of a many-level atom to an applied, monochromatic field. In the case of a three-level system, it is predicted that optical nutations are not just limited to the resonant transition, but are also present in the fluorescence involving the other level.
The interaction of an atomic system with an unquantized electromagnetic field is studied by means of the Heisenberg-operator equations of motion. The electromagnetic fields created by the atom are taken into account by assuming that the charge and probability current densities are the actual charge and current source terms in Maxwell's equation. When Ehrenfest's theorem is written to order (1/c)2{)}^{2})2, the equations of motion are found to have a constant of motion that can be interpreted as stating that the sum of the atomic energy, energy of interaction, and energy stored in the electromagnetic field is constant. This constant of integration can be expressed as an expectation of a new semiclassical Hamiltonian that now includes the effects of the atomic self-fields to order 1/c2{\mathit{c}}^{2}c2. This Hamiltonian is related to the classical Darwin Lagrangian. Since the new approximate Hamiltonian is the sum of an atomic and a field Hamiltonian, it provides a formulation of semiclassical radiation theory that is formally close to the usual formulation of quantum electrodynamics. A Schr\"odinger equation can be derived by applying the variational principle to the expectation of the new Hamiltonian. The result is a nonlinear integro-differential equation, in \ensuremath{\Psi}, which is somewhat similar to Hartree's self-consistent equation for a multielectron atom.When the Heisenberg equations are written to include the next-higher-order terms, 1/c3{\mathit{c}}^{3}c3, it is found that the total energy of the atom and the electromagnetic field in the vicinity of the atom decreases at a rate that is given by the Larmor power formula (2e2{\mathit{e}}^{2}e2/3c3{\mathit{c}}^{3}c3)(d〈v〉/dt)2{)}^{2})2, where 〈v〉 is the quantum-mechanical expectation of the electron's velocity operator. This approximate formulation of semiclassical radiation theory is applied to semiclassical calculations of atomic radiative shifts. It is then shown that, if some retardation effects are included to all orders of 1/c in the vector potential, the semiclassical analysis provides a formula for radiative energy-level shifts that are time dependent and that contain coefficients similar to the starting point of the Bethe calculation of the Lamb shift. The incorporation of mass renormalization in semiclassical theory is then discussed.
Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.
According to modern quantum field theory all elementary particles are quantum excitations of an underlying quantum field. In the case of the photon the underlying field is the electromagnetic field. In photon wave mechanics the photon concept was reached by a reinterpretation of the physical meaning of the free classical electromagnetic field. Such a reinterpretation does not give us a quantum theory of light quanta because the elementary quantum of action is foreign to classical physics. Although Planck’s constant does occur in the various Schro¨dinger-like wave equations we have presented in Part III it just plays the role of a multiplicative factor, see e.g., Eq. (10.36). The “justification” for bringing ~ into the formalism is the wish to make contact to the Einstein-de Broglie relations [Eqs. (10.40) and (10.41)]. In a sense one may call the light particle appearing from classical electrodynamics the classical photon.