Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Propagator and multiple scattering approach to the time of arrival problem

Victor F. Los, Andrei V. Los

Published Apr 21, 2011• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The propagator approach combined with the multiple-scattering theory is applied to the particle time of arrival (TOA) problem. This approach allows us to naturally include in the consideration the components of the particle initial wavefunction (defined at t = t0) corresponding to the positive (forward-moving term) and negative (backward-moving term) momenta. For a freely moving particle it is shown that the Allcock definition of the ideal total TOA probability disregards the backward-moving and interference terms entirely. In the presence of a measuring apparatus modeled by an imaginary step potential with the amplitude V0, the general expression for the TOA rate is obtained, the forward-moving component of which coincides with that obtained by Allcock. It is shown that when the initial particle wavefunction is well separated from the point of arrival and has a well-defined average momentum, the contribution of the backward-moving and interference terms are small and can be neglected. For a small V0, except the well-known convolution result by Allcock–Kijowski, the exponential form of the TOA rate follows at the double limit condition V0 → 0, t − t0 ~ /2V0 → ∞ (2V0(t − t0)/ is finite) while the backward-moving and interference terms vanish. We show that the Allcock result for the TOA rate is valid in the entire range of V0 including the Zeno case (V0 → ∞) and the normalized TOA rate can be introduced for all values of V0 as a probability distribution. The latter is illustrated for the Gaussian wave packet.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/44/21/215301

Related papers

Time of arrival in the presence of interactions

Juan León, J. Julve, P. Pitanga +1 more

We introduce a formalism for the calculation of the time of arrival t at a space point for particles traveling through interacting media. We develop a general formulation that employs quantum canonical transformations from the free to the interacting cases to compute t in the context of the positive-operator-valued measures. We then compute the probability distribution in the times of arrival at a point for particles that have undergone reflection, transmission or tunneling off finite potential barriers. For narrow Gaussian initial wave packets we obtain multimodal time distribution of the reflected packets and a combination of the Hartman effect with unexpected retardation in tunneling. We also employ explicitly our formalism to deal with arrivals in the interaction region for the step and linear potentials.

arXiv:quant-ph/0002011•Physical Review A•May 3, 2000•55 citations

Time of arrival in quantum and Bohmian mechanics

C. Richard Leavens

In a recent paper Grot, Rovelli, and Tate (GRT) [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4676 (1996)] derived an expression for the probability distribution $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ of intrinsic arrival times $T(X)$ at position $x=X$ for a quantum particle with initial wave function $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t=0)$ freely evolving in one dimension. This was done by quantizing the classical expression for the time of arrival of a free particle at $X,$ assuming a particular choice of operator ordering, and then regulating the resulting time of arrival operator. For the special case of a minimum-uncertainty-product wave packet at $t=0$ with average wave number $〈k〉$ and variance $\ensuremath{\Delta}k$ they showed that their analytical expression for $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ agreed with the probability current density $J(x=X,t=T)$ only to terms of order $\ensuremath{\Delta}k/〈k〉.$ They dismissed the probability current density as a viable candidate for the exact arrival time distribution on the grounds that it can sometimes be negative. This fact is not a problem within Bohmian mechanics where the arrival time distribution for a particle, either free or in the presence of a potential, is rigorously given by $|J(X,T)|$ (suitably normalized) [W. R. McKinnon and C. R. Leavens, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2748 (1995); C. R. Leavens, Phys. Lett. A 178, 27 (1993); M. Daumer et al., in On Three Levels: The Mathematical Physics of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Approaches to Physics, edited by M. Fannes et al. (Plenum, New York, 1994); M. Daumer, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, edited by J. T. Cushing et al. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996)]. The two theories are compared in this paper and a case presented for which the results could not differ more: According to GRT's theory, every particle in the ensemble reaches a point $x=X,$ where $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t)$ and $J(x,t)$ are both zero for all $t,$ while no particle ever reaches $X$ according to the theory based on Bohmian mechanics. Some possible implications are discussed.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1998•93 citations

The velocity of probability transport in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy, Anthony J. Bracken

In his study of the ‘time of arrival’ problem in the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of a single particle, Allcock [1] noted that the direction of the probability flux vector is not necessarily the same as that of the mean momentum of a wave packet, even when the packet is composed entirely of plane waves with a common direction of momentum. Packets can be constructed, for example for a particle moving under a constant force, in which probability flows for a finite time in the opposite direction to the momentum. A similar phenomenon occurs for the Dirac electron. The maximum amount of probabilitiy backflow which can occur over a given time interval can be calculated in each case.

Annalen der Physik•Dec 1, 1998•20 citations

The velocity of probability transport in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy, Anthony J. Bracken

Abstract In his study of the ‘time of arrival’ problem in the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of a single particle, Allcock [1] noted that the direction of the probability flux vector is not necessarily the same as that of the mean momentum of a wave packet, even when the packet is composed entirely of plane waves with a common direction of momentum. Packets can be constructed, for example for a particle moving under a constant force, in which probability flows for a finite time in the opposite direction to the momentum. A similar phenomenon occurs for the Dirac electron. The maximum amount of probabilitiy backflow which can occur over a given time interval can be calculated in each case.

Annalen der Physik•Dec 1, 1998•16 citations

Time-of-arrival probabilities and quantum measurements: III Decay of unstable states

Charis Anastopoulos, Ntina Savvidou

We study the construction of probability densities for time-of-arrival in quantum mechanics. Our treatment is based upon the facts that (i) time appears in quantum theory as an external parameter to the system, and (ii) propositions about the time-of-arrival appear naturally when one considers histories. The definition of time-of-arrival probabilities is straightforward in stochastic processes. The difficulties that arise in quantum theory are due to the fact that the time parameter of Schrödinger’s equation does not naturally define a probability density at the continuum limit, but also because the procedure one follows is sensitive on the interpretation of the reduction procedure. We consider the issue in Copenhagen quantum mechanics and in history-based schemes like consistent histories. The benefit of the latter is that it allows a proper passage to the continuous limit–there are however problems related to the quantum Zeno effect and decoherence. We finally employ the histories-based description to construct Positive-Operator-Valued-Measures (POVMs) for the timeof-arrival, which are valid for a general Hamiltonian. These POVMs typically depend on the resolution of the measurement device; for a free particle, however, this dependence cancels in the physically relevant regime and the POVM coincides with that of Kijowski. 1

•Jan 1, 1989•18 citations

Operator-normalized quantum arrival times in the presence of interactions

Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt, D. Seidel, Juan Gonzalo Muga +1 more

We model ideal arrival-time measurements for free quantum particles and for particles subject to an external interaction by means of a narrow and weak absorbing potential. This approach is related to the operational approach of measuring the first photon emitted from a two-level atom illuminated by a laser. By operator normalizing the resulting time-of-arrival distribution, a distribution is obtained which for freely moving particles not only recovers the axiomatically derived distribution of Kijowski for states with purely positive momenta but is also applicable to general momentum components. For particles interacting with a square barrier the mean arrival time and corresponding ``tunneling time'' obtained at the transmission side of the barrier become independent of the barrier width (Hartman effect) for arbitrarily wide barriers, i.e., without the transition to the ultraopaque, classical-like regime dominated by wave packet components above the barrier.

arXiv:quant-ph/0311107•Physical Review A•Jul 22, 2004•38 citations
The propagator approach combined with the multiple-scattering theory is applied to the particle time of arrival (TOA) problem. This approach allows us to naturally include in the consideration the components of the particle initial wavefunction (defined at t = t0) corresponding to the positive (forward-moving term) and negative (backward-moving term) momenta. For a freely moving particle it is shown that the Allcock definition of the ideal total TOA probability disregards the backward-moving and interference terms entirely. In the presence of a measuring apparatus modeled by an imaginary step potential with the amplitude V0, the general expression for the TOA rate is obtained, the forward-moving component of which coincides with that obtained by Allcock. It is shown that when the initial particle wavefunction is well separated from the point of arrival and has a well-defined average momentum, the contribution of the backward-moving and interference terms are small and can be neglected. For a small V0, except the well-known convolution result by Allcock–Kijowski, the exponential form of the TOA rate follows at the double limit condition V0 → 0, t − t0 ~ /2V0 → ∞ (2V0(t − t0)/ is finite) while the backward-moving and interference terms vanish. We show that the Allcock result for the TOA rate is valid in the entire range of V0 including the Zeno case (V0 → ∞) and the normalized TOA rate can be introduced for all values of V0 as a probability distribution. The latter is illustrated for the Gaussian wave packet.
We introduce a formalism for the calculation of the time of arrival t at a space point for particles traveling through interacting media. We develop a general formulation that employs quantum canonical transformations from the free to the interacting cases to compute t in the context of the positive-operator-valued measures. We then compute the probability distribution in the times of arrival at a point for particles that have undergone reflection, transmission or tunneling off finite potential barriers. For narrow Gaussian initial wave packets we obtain multimodal time distribution of the reflected packets and a combination of the Hartman effect with unexpected retardation in tunneling. We also employ explicitly our formalism to deal with arrivals in the interaction region for the step and linear potentials.
In a recent paper Grot, Rovelli, and Tate (GRT) [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4676 (1996)] derived an expression for the probability distribution $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ of intrinsic arrival times T(X)T(X)T(X) at position x=Xx=Xx=X for a quantum particle with initial wave function $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t=0)$ freely evolving in one dimension. This was done by quantizing the classical expression for the time of arrival of a free particle at X,X,X, assuming a particular choice of operator ordering, and then regulating the resulting time of arrival operator. For the special case of a minimum-uncertainty-product wave packet at t=0t=0t=0 with average wave number 〈k〉〈k〉〈k〉 and variance $\ensuremath{\Delta}k$ they showed that their analytical expression for $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ agreed with the probability current density J(x=X,t=T)J(x=X,t=T)J(x=X,t=T) only to terms of order $\ensuremath{\Delta}k/〈k〉.$ They dismissed the probability current density as a viable candidate for the exact arrival time distribution on the grounds that it can sometimes be negative. This fact is not a problem within Bohmian mechanics where the arrival time distribution for a particle, either free or in the presence of a potential, is rigorously given by ∣J(X,T)∣|J(X,T)|∣J(X,T)∣ (suitably normalized) [W. R. McKinnon and C. R. Leavens, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2748 (1995); C. R. Leavens, Phys. Lett. A 178, 27 (1993); M. Daumer et al., in On Three Levels: The Mathematical Physics of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Approaches to Physics, edited by M. Fannes et al. (Plenum, New York, 1994); M. Daumer, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, edited by J. T. Cushing et al. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996)]. The two theories are compared in this paper and a case presented for which the results could not differ more: According to GRT's theory, every particle in the ensemble reaches a point x=X,x=X,x=X, where $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t)$ and J(x,t)J(x,t)J(x,t) are both zero for all t,t,t, while no particle ever reaches XXX according to the theory based on Bohmian mechanics. Some possible implications are discussed.
In his study of the ‘time of arrival’ problem in the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of a single particle, Allcock [1] noted that the direction of the probability flux vector is not necessarily the same as that of the mean momentum of a wave packet, even when the packet is composed entirely of plane waves with a common direction of momentum. Packets can be constructed, for example for a particle moving under a constant force, in which probability flows for a finite time in the opposite direction to the momentum. A similar phenomenon occurs for the Dirac electron. The maximum amount of probabilitiy backflow which can occur over a given time interval can be calculated in each case.
Abstract In his study of the ‘time of arrival’ problem in the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of a single particle, Allcock [1] noted that the direction of the probability flux vector is not necessarily the same as that of the mean momentum of a wave packet, even when the packet is composed entirely of plane waves with a common direction of momentum. Packets can be constructed, for example for a particle moving under a constant force, in which probability flows for a finite time in the opposite direction to the momentum. A similar phenomenon occurs for the Dirac electron. The maximum amount of probabilitiy backflow which can occur over a given time interval can be calculated in each case.
We study the construction of probability densities for time-of-arrival in quantum mechanics. Our treatment is based upon the facts that (i) time appears in quantum theory as an external parameter to the system, and (ii) propositions about the time-of-arrival appear naturally when one considers histories. The definition of time-of-arrival probabilities is straightforward in stochastic processes. The difficulties that arise in quantum theory are due to the fact that the time parameter of Schrödinger’s equation does not naturally define a probability density at the continuum limit, but also because the procedure one follows is sensitive on the interpretation of the reduction procedure. We consider the issue in Copenhagen quantum mechanics and in history-based schemes like consistent histories. The benefit of the latter is that it allows a proper passage to the continuous limit–there are however problems related to the quantum Zeno effect and decoherence. We finally employ the histories-based description to construct Positive-Operator-Valued-Measures (POVMs) for the timeof-arrival, which are valid for a general Hamiltonian. These POVMs typically depend on the resolution of the measurement device; for a free particle, however, this dependence cancels in the physically relevant regime and the POVM coincides with that of Kijowski. 1
We model ideal arrival-time measurements for free quantum particles and for particles subject to an external interaction by means of a narrow and weak absorbing potential. This approach is related to the operational approach of measuring the first photon emitted from a two-level atom illuminated by a laser. By operator normalizing the resulting time-of-arrival distribution, a distribution is obtained which for freely moving particles not only recovers the axiomatically derived distribution of Kijowski for states with purely positive momenta but is also applicable to general momentum components. For particles interacting with a square barrier the mean arrival time and corresponding ``tunneling time'' obtained at the transmission side of the barrier become independent of the barrier width (Hartman effect) for arbitrarily wide barriers, i.e., without the transition to the ultraopaque, classical-like regime dominated by wave packet components above the barrier.