Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nuclear Physics B

Bound-state perturbation theory: A new approach

David Atkinson

Published Jun 1, 1970• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0550-3213(70)90199-9

Related papers

The Perturbation Theory for Bound States

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 1, 2020•0 citations

Generalized bound-state perturbation theory

Carl G. Adler, Ollie James Rose

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1979•1 citation

New perturbation treatment of scattering and bound-state problem

Annals of Physics•May 1, 1968•0 citations

Stationary Perturbation Theory with Spatially Well-separated Potentials

Kim, Seok, Choonkyu Lee

We present a new perturbation theory for quantum mechanical energy eigenstates when the potential equals the sum of two localized, but not necessarily weak potentials $V_{1}(\vec{r})$ and $V_{2}(\vec{r})$, with the distance $L$ between the respective centers of the two taken to be quite large. It is assumed that complete eigenfunctions of the local Hamiltonians (i.e., in the presence of $V_{1}(\vec{r})$ or $V_{2}(\vec{r})$ only) are available as inputs to our perturbation theory. If the two local Hamiltonians have degenerate bound-state energy levels, a systematic extension of the molecular orbital theory (or the tight-binding approximation) follows from our formalism. Our approach can be viewed as a systematic adaptation of the multiple scattering theory to the problem of bound states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0209046•Sep 6, 2002•0 citations

The quantum probability equation: I. Bound state perturbation theory

Geoffrey C Milward, Colin Wilkin C

The partial-wave Schrödinger equation with real boundary conditions is recast as an equation for the probability density. When a small additional potential is included, the changes in the bound-state energy eigenvalues are obtained, up to third order in the perturbation, purely in terms of the perturbing potential and the unperturbed probability density. Although the approach is different, our results are equivalent to those derived by Bender (Bender C M 1978 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (New York: McGraw-Hill) p 330). Knowledge of neither the unperturbed energy spectrum nor the wavefunctions of excited states is required. Evaluations of the second-order energy shift are given for some soluble S -wave problems.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 5, 2000•5 citations

Stationary-State Perturbation Theory

Stephen P. Martin

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
We present a new perturbation theory for quantum mechanical energy eigenstates when the potential equals the sum of two localized, but not necessarily weak potentials V1(r⃗)V_{1}(\vec{r})V1​(r) and V2(r⃗)V_{2}(\vec{r})V2​(r), with the distance LLL between the respective centers of the two taken to be quite large. It is assumed that complete eigenfunctions of the local Hamiltonians (i.e., in the presence of V1(r⃗)V_{1}(\vec{r})V1​(r) or V2(r⃗)V_{2}(\vec{r})V2​(r) only) are available as inputs to our perturbation theory. If the two local Hamiltonians have degenerate bound-state energy levels, a systematic extension of the molecular orbital theory (or the tight-binding approximation) follows from our formalism. Our approach can be viewed as a systematic adaptation of the multiple scattering theory to the problem of bound states.
The partial-wave Schrödinger equation with real boundary conditions is recast as an equation for the probability density. When a small additional potential is included, the changes in the bound-state energy eigenvalues are obtained, up to third order in the perturbation, purely in terms of the perturbing potential and the unperturbed probability density. Although the approach is different, our results are equivalent to those derived by Bender (Bender C M 1978 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (New York: McGraw-Hill) p 330). Knowledge of neither the unperturbed energy spectrum nor the wavefunctions of excited states is required. Evaluations of the second-order energy shift are given for some soluble S -wave problems.