Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

The quantum probability equation: I. Bound state perturbation theory

Geoffrey C Milward, Colin Wilkin C

Published Oct 5, 2000• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The partial-wave Schrödinger equation with real boundary conditions is recast as an equation for the probability density. When a small additional potential is included, the changes in the bound-state energy eigenvalues are obtained, up to third order in the perturbation, purely in terms of the perturbing potential and the unperturbed probability density. Although the approach is different, our results are equivalent to those derived by Bender (Bender C M 1978 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (New York: McGraw-Hill) p 330). Knowledge of neither the unperturbed energy spectrum nor the wavefunctions of excited states is required. Evaluations of the second-order energy shift are given for some soluble S -wave problems.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/33/41/307

Related papers

The quantum probability equation: II. Scattering state perturbation theory

Geoffrey C Milward, Colin Wilkin C

The time-independent bound-state perturbation theory derived for the quantum probability equation (Milward G C and Wilkin C 2000 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 7353 ) is extended to treat the scattering domain. Formulae for the changes in the partial wave phase shifts are derived to third order in the perturbing potential. The results are compared with those obtained for analytically soluble problems.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jun 7, 2001•6 citations

Stationary State Perturbation Theory

Gordon Baym

The bound states of a weak attractive potential never come out of doing perturbation theory on free particle states. This is a quite general rule: if the perturbation commutes with a constant of the motion, A, of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, then matrix elements of the perturbation between eigenstates of A with different eigenvalues must vanish. This rule, an example of a selection rule, often simplifies the problem of selecting the correct linear combination of degenerate states with which to do the perturbation expansion. The Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation theory – yields rather complicated expressions for the change in the states in second order and beyond. There is a somewhat different form of the perturbation theory, due to Brillouin and Wigner that enables to see more clearly the structure of the perturbed states.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

TIME-DEPENDENT PERTURBATION METHODS

Vishnu S. Mathur, Surendra Singh

We now consider systems for which the Hamiltonian contains time-dependent interaction terms. In such cases we cannot reduce the time-dependent Schro¨dinger equation to an eigenvalue equation. However, if the time-dependent terms can be regarded as small perturbations, we can develop a form of perturbation theory that can be used to calculate the effects of time-dependent terms. Consider a system for which the Hamiltonian may be written as the sum of a dominant unperturbed part Hˆ0 and a small perturbation Hˆ ′ as Hˆ = Hˆ0 + λHˆ ′(t) , (10.1.1) where the unperturbed Hamiltonian Hˆ0 is independent of time, whereas the perturbation Hˆ ′ may depend on time. The parameter 0 < λ < 1 has been introduced to keep track of various orders of approximations as in the case of time-independent perturbation theory discussed in Chapter 8. The basic idea is that a small perturbation to the Hamiltonian will produce a small change in the wave function. For a time-dependent perturbation, this change means that a system, initially in a particular eigenstate of Hˆ0, will find itself in a time-dependent admixture of the eigenstates. Thus the time-dependent perturbation causes the system to undergo transition to different eigenstates of Hˆ0. So for time-dependent perturbations our interest lies in calculating the probabilities for transition to different states.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Dec 12, 2008•0 citations

Effect of the continuum states in second-order perturbation theory: An example

Manuel Coronado, N. Domínguez, J. Flores +1 more

Using a simple example, in which a square-well potential is perturbed by another square-well potential, the effect of the continuum states on the lowest eigenvalue of a one-dimensional Schrödinger equation is evaluated in second-order perturbation theory. We show that this effect decreases when the number of unperturbed bound states grows.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1982•3 citations

Quantisation and density of eigenvalues from the Schrodinger equation for bounded systems

U Larsen

A general formulation of the eigenvalue condition is pointed out for a one-dimensional stationary part of a separable Schrodinger equation with finite bounds, i.e. where the wavefunction vanishes at two arbitrary values of the independent variable. The procedure is general and applies equally to other eigenvalue problems of second-order, homogeneous differential equations. Where appropriate a continuous density of eigenvalues can be defined and evaluated without first solving the eigenvalue problem. Illustrative examples are provided, including gravitational and harmonic oscillator potentials.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 11, 1983•6 citations

Quantization and the Schrödinger Equation

Floyd L. Williams

The basic equation of quantum mechanics is the Schrödinger equation which expresses the wave function Ψ of a quantum system as an eigenfunction of a quantized Hamiltonian operator H : HΨ = λΨ where the (real) eigenvalue λ is the quantum energy of the system in the state Ψ see equations (1.3.2), (1.3.4). Embodied already in this equation is the basic quantum mechanical principle that quantum energies cannot take on arbitrary values but are quantized : they are given by a discrete set of eigenvalues of a suitable second-order differential operator. This mathematical phenomenon of the discreteness of eigenvalues explains, for example, the observed discreteness of absorption and emission atomic spectral lines; compare remarks in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1. The Schrödinger theory, and the equivalent theory of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, represents a distinct advancement of the Bohr theory. Some early basic papers on quantum mechanics are compiled in the book [82], which includes a historic introduction by B. van der Waerden. Also see [6, 8, 9, 24, 75, 76]. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Progress in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations
The partial-wave Schrödinger equation with real boundary conditions is recast as an equation for the probability density. When a small additional potential is included, the changes in the bound-state energy eigenvalues are obtained, up to third order in the perturbation, purely in terms of the perturbing potential and the unperturbed probability density. Although the approach is different, our results are equivalent to those derived by Bender (Bender C M 1978 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (New York: McGraw-Hill) p 330). Knowledge of neither the unperturbed energy spectrum nor the wavefunctions of excited states is required. Evaluations of the second-order energy shift are given for some soluble S -wave problems.
The bound states of a weak attractive potential never come out of doing perturbation theory on free particle states. This is a quite general rule: if the perturbation commutes with a constant of the motion, A, of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, then matrix elements of the perturbation between eigenstates of A with different eigenvalues must vanish. This rule, an example of a selection rule, often simplifies the problem of selecting the correct linear combination of degenerate states with which to do the perturbation expansion. The Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation theory – yields rather complicated expressions for the change in the states in second order and beyond. There is a somewhat different form of the perturbation theory, due to Brillouin and Wigner that enables to see more clearly the structure of the perturbed states.
We now consider systems for which the Hamiltonian contains time-dependent interaction terms. In such cases we cannot reduce the time-dependent Schro¨dinger equation to an eigenvalue equation. However, if the time-dependent terms can be regarded as small perturbations, we can develop a form of perturbation theory that can be used to calculate the effects of time-dependent terms. Consider a system for which the Hamiltonian may be written as the sum of a dominant unperturbed part Hˆ0 and a small perturbation Hˆ ′ as Hˆ = Hˆ0 + λHˆ ′(t) , (10.1.1) where the unperturbed Hamiltonian Hˆ0 is independent of time, whereas the perturbation Hˆ ′ may depend on time. The parameter 0 < λ < 1 has been introduced to keep track of various orders of approximations as in the case of time-independent perturbation theory discussed in Chapter 8. The basic idea is that a small perturbation to the Hamiltonian will produce a small change in the wave function. For a time-dependent perturbation, this change means that a system, initially in a particular eigenstate of Hˆ0, will find itself in a time-dependent admixture of the eigenstates. Thus the time-dependent perturbation causes the system to undergo transition to different eigenstates of Hˆ0. So for time-dependent perturbations our interest lies in calculating the probabilities for transition to different states.
A general formulation of the eigenvalue condition is pointed out for a one-dimensional stationary part of a separable Schrodinger equation with finite bounds, i.e. where the wavefunction vanishes at two arbitrary values of the independent variable. The procedure is general and applies equally to other eigenvalue problems of second-order, homogeneous differential equations. Where appropriate a continuous density of eigenvalues can be defined and evaluated without first solving the eigenvalue problem. Illustrative examples are provided, including gravitational and harmonic oscillator potentials.
The basic equation of quantum mechanics is the Schrödinger equation which expresses the wave function Ψ of a quantum system as an eigenfunction of a quantized Hamiltonian operator H : HΨ = λΨ where the (real) eigenvalue λ is the quantum energy of the system in the state Ψ see equations (1.3.2), (1.3.4). Embodied already in this equation is the basic quantum mechanical principle that quantum energies cannot take on arbitrary values but are quantized : they are given by a discrete set of eigenvalues of a suitable second-order differential operator. This mathematical phenomenon of the discreteness of eigenvalues explains, for example, the observed discreteness of absorption and emission atomic spectral lines; compare remarks in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1. The Schrödinger theory, and the equivalent theory of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, represents a distinct advancement of the Bohr theory. Some early basic papers on quantum mechanics are compiled in the book [82], which includes a historic introduction by B. van der Waerden. Also see [6, 8, 9, 24, 75, 76]. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.