Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

From Dualism to Unity in Quantum Mechanics

Alfred Landé

Published Jan 1, 1988• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-009-3981-3_73

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and Dualism

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

De Gruyter eBooks•Aug 6, 2014•3 citations

Quantum Mechanics as Dualism

Robert B. Jones

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 22, 2011•0 citations

Wave-particle dualism and the interpretation of quantum mechanics

Christopher Dewdney, G. Horton, Mai Mai Lam +2 more

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1992•24 citations

Dualism and Incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics. Towards New Consistent Theories

Antonino Drago

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

On the Correct Theoretical Analysis of the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Temur Z. Kalanov

The correct critical analysis of the generally accepted foundations of quantum mechanics is proposed [1]. The purpose of the analysis is to prove that the foundations include logical errors. The principle of the unity of formal logic and dialectics is a methodological basis of the analysis. The result is as follows: (a) the generally accepted foundations (i.e., the interpretation of the experimental data on diffraction of quantum particles; the conception of wave-corpuscle dualism; the probabilistic interpretation of the psi-function) are logical errors; (b) the pseudo-informational meaning is the true meaning of the psi-function. Conclusion is that quantum mechanics is not a physical, objective theory but a pseudo-informational one. Therefore, quantum mechanics should be replaced by a physical, objective quantum theory.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 17, 2005•16 citations

FROM DUALISM TO UNITY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Alfred Landé

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•May 1, 1959•8 citations
The correct critical analysis of the generally accepted foundations of quantum mechanics is proposed [1]. The purpose of the analysis is to prove that the foundations include logical errors. The principle of the unity of formal logic and dialectics is a methodological basis of the analysis. The result is as follows: (a) the generally accepted foundations (i.e., the interpretation of the experimental data on diffraction of quantum particles; the conception of wave-corpuscle dualism; the probabilistic interpretation of the psi-function) are logical errors; (b) the pseudo-informational meaning is the true meaning of the psi-function. Conclusion is that quantum mechanics is not a physical, objective theory but a pseudo-informational one. Therefore, quantum mechanics should be replaced by a physical, objective quantum theory.