Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

The many-worlds and relative states interpretations of quantum mechanics, and the quantum Zeno paradox

Dipankar Home, M. A. B. Whitaker

Published Aug 1, 1987• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The quantum Zeno paradox is examined within the many-worlds and relative states interpretations of quantum mechanics. In the many-worlds interpretation the effect is predicted to persist. The possibility of recombining worlds is not expected to be relevant. In the simplest form of relative states interpretation the effect may be avoided but this form of interpretation experiences difficulties in coping with conventional problems of quantum theory. The more complex version of the relative states interpretation, which takes account of the correlations of system with apparatus, predicts the occurrence of the paradox.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/20/11/036

Related papers

The relative states and many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics and the EPR problem

M. A. B. Whitaker

The basic contributions to the concept of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics are analysed. It is found necessary to divide them into two classes corresponding to (a) the relative-states interpretation (RSI), which avoids problems of measurement, but is found generally unconvincing, and (b) the many-worlds interpretation (MWI), which is more comprehensible, but has all the problems of the von Neumann scheme. The EPR problem is tackled using each interpretation. The RSI finds no problem, while the MWI meets the same difficulties as conventional interpretations.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 1, 1985•11 citations

A critical re-examination of the quantum Zeno paradox

Dipankar Home, M. A. B. Whitaker

The quantum Zeno paradox is defined as a negative-result experiment involving a macroscopic apparatus, and distinguished from other quantum Zeno processes. It is demonstrated that collapse of state-vector is not a requirement for the paradox, which is independent of interpretation of quantum theory. Gedanken experiments are outlined which illustrate the key features of the paradox, and its implications for the realist interpretation are discussed.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 7, 1992•37 citations

Quantum Philosophy

Christopher C. Gerry, Kimberley M. Bruno

Standard quantum theory is highly successful in all its applications, from photons and atoms, to semiconductors, superconductors, quarks, and so on. Yet the need to understand what the theory is really trying to tell us about the nature of the world beyond specific predictions forces us into the realm of philosophy, or, as some have dubbed it, quantum metaphysics: the study of the interpretation of quantum mechanics. There is a wide range of opinions regarding the philosophical foundations of quantum mechanics. This chapter focuses on two of the most prominent interpretations: the Copenhagen interpretation, and one alternative interpretation that has been gaining some support in recent years, the many-worlds interpretation (MWI), also known as the many universes interpretation. The central issues of contention are: firstly, that the measurement of some attribute of a quantum system generally involves the probabilistic collapse, or reduction, of the state vector where the probabilistic nature of the process is inherent—that is, not reducible to a more fundamental, deterministic explanation; and, secondly, the problem of bringing a measurement to a completion—a problem generally known as the measurement paradox.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Feb 21, 2013•0 citations

Interpreting the quantum

David Wallace

Abstract This chapter surveys various proposals to interpret—that is, make sense of—quantum mechanics. We could attempt to think of quantum mechanics in purely instrumentalist terms, as an algorithm to predict observed experimental results. But this fits badly with scientific practice and is probably not viable. We could attempt to modify quantum mechanics itself to resolve the paradoxes, and there are some simple models that attempt to do that: some are ‘hidden-variable’ theories that add extra properties to the theory, some are ‘dynamical-collapse’ theories that modify the theory’s equations. But none of these models succeed in reproducing quantum theory’s predictions outside a relatively narrow range of applications. Or we could try to take the apparent indefiniteness of quantum mechanics literally, and interpret it as a theory of many parallel worlds. The correct interpretation of quantum mechanics remains controversial, but the search for understanding and interpretation of the theory has led to very substantial scientific results and is likely to lead to more.

•Apr 22, 2021•0 citations

Resolving the Quantum Zeno Paradox via Observer-Relative Information

Greco, Giuseppe Junior

The Quantum Zeno effect is often interpreted as demonstrating that frequent measurements physically inhibit the dynamical evolution of a quantum system. This paper develops an Observer-First Interpretation (OFI) in which quantum states are treated as observer-relative informational constructs constrained by evidence accessibility and record stability. Within this framework, Zeno-like stabilization does not arise from a physical freezing of dynamics, but from repeated informational conditioning that continuously redefines the effective state of the system relative to the observer. The proposed interpretation preserves unitary evolution, respects causal structure, and reproduces all experimentally observed Quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno phenomena without modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics.

•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

The Quantum Zeno Paradox, 42 Years On

Wayne M. Itano

The term 'quantum Zeno paradox' or 'quantum Zeno effect' refers to the slowing down of the evolution of a quantum system as it is observed more and more frequently.In 1977, Misra and Sudarshan gave a theoretical demonstration of its existence.There has been disagreement regarding the definition of the effect and whether it is really a paradox, requiring new physics, or a consequence of ordinary quantum mechanics.The experiment of Itano, Heinzen, Bollinger and Wineland, published in 1990, is the one most often called a demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect.Some different interpretations are discussed.

Current Science•Jan 25, 2019•7 citations
The quantum Zeno paradox is examined within the many-worlds and relative states interpretations of quantum mechanics. In the many-worlds interpretation the effect is predicted to persist. The possibility of recombining worlds is not expected to be relevant. In the simplest form of relative states interpretation the effect may be avoided but this form of interpretation experiences difficulties in coping with conventional problems of quantum theory. The more complex version of the relative states interpretation, which takes account of the correlations of system with apparatus, predicts the occurrence of the paradox.
The basic contributions to the concept of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics are analysed. It is found necessary to divide them into two classes corresponding to (a) the relative-states interpretation (RSI), which avoids problems of measurement, but is found generally unconvincing, and (b) the many-worlds interpretation (MWI), which is more comprehensible, but has all the problems of the von Neumann scheme. The EPR problem is tackled using each interpretation. The RSI finds no problem, while the MWI meets the same difficulties as conventional interpretations.
Standard quantum theory is highly successful in all its applications, from photons and atoms, to semiconductors, superconductors, quarks, and so on. Yet the need to understand what the theory is really trying to tell us about the nature of the world beyond specific predictions forces us into the realm of philosophy, or, as some have dubbed it, quantum metaphysics: the study of the interpretation of quantum mechanics. There is a wide range of opinions regarding the philosophical foundations of quantum mechanics. This chapter focuses on two of the most prominent interpretations: the Copenhagen interpretation, and one alternative interpretation that has been gaining some support in recent years, the many-worlds interpretation (MWI), also known as the many universes interpretation. The central issues of contention are: firstly, that the measurement of some attribute of a quantum system generally involves the probabilistic collapse, or reduction, of the state vector where the probabilistic nature of the process is inherent—that is, not reducible to a more fundamental, deterministic explanation; and, secondly, the problem of bringing a measurement to a completion—a problem generally known as the measurement paradox.
Abstract This chapter surveys various proposals to interpret—that is, make sense of—quantum mechanics. We could attempt to think of quantum mechanics in purely instrumentalist terms, as an algorithm to predict observed experimental results. But this fits badly with scientific practice and is probably not viable. We could attempt to modify quantum mechanics itself to resolve the paradoxes, and there are some simple models that attempt to do that: some are ‘hidden-variable’ theories that add extra properties to the theory, some are ‘dynamical-collapse’ theories that modify the theory’s equations. But none of these models succeed in reproducing quantum theory’s predictions outside a relatively narrow range of applications. Or we could try to take the apparent indefiniteness of quantum mechanics literally, and interpret it as a theory of many parallel worlds. The correct interpretation of quantum mechanics remains controversial, but the search for understanding and interpretation of the theory has led to very substantial scientific results and is likely to lead to more.
The Quantum Zeno effect is often interpreted as demonstrating that frequent measurements physically inhibit the dynamical evolution of a quantum system. This paper develops an Observer-First Interpretation (OFI) in which quantum states are treated as observer-relative informational constructs constrained by evidence accessibility and record stability. Within this framework, Zeno-like stabilization does not arise from a physical freezing of dynamics, but from repeated informational conditioning that continuously redefines the effective state of the system relative to the observer. The proposed interpretation preserves unitary evolution, respects causal structure, and reproduces all experimentally observed Quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno phenomena without modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics.
The term 'quantum Zeno paradox' or 'quantum Zeno effect' refers to the slowing down of the evolution of a quantum system as it is observed more and more frequently.In 1977, Misra and Sudarshan gave a theoretical demonstration of its existence.There has been disagreement regarding the definition of the effect and whether it is really a paradox, requiring new physics, or a consequence of ordinary quantum mechanics.The experiment of Itano, Heinzen, Bollinger and Wineland, published in 1990, is the one most often called a demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect.Some different interpretations are discussed.