Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

A Non-Entanglement Quantum Single Sign-On Protocol

Guiping Dai, Yong Wang

Published Mar 11, 2014• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-014-2057-1

Related papers

A Two-State Entanglement Based Quantum Single Sign-On Protocol

Yong Wang, Bingzhan Ma, Guiping Dai

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•May 16, 2014•0 citations

A Four-State Entanglement Based Quantum Single Sign-On Protocol

Yong Wang, RongQiang Xu, Guiping Dai

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 19, 2014•0 citations

A Non-entanglement Quantum Single Sign-On Solution

Guiping Dai, Yong Wang

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 20, 2013•0 citations

A Quantum Single Sign-On Protocol Based on GHZ States

Xingtian Ren, Yong Wang, Guiping Dai

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 20, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs

Preeti Yadav, Paulo Mateus, Nikola Paunković +1 more

We present a quantum scheme for signing contracts between two clients (Alice and Bob) using entangled states and the services of a third trusted party (Trent). The trusted party is only contacted for the initialization of the protocol, and possibly at the end, to verify clients’ honesty and deliver signed certificates. The protocol is fair, i.e., the probability that a client, say Bob, can obtain a signed copy of the contract, while Alice cannot, can be made arbitrarily small, and scales as N − 1 / 2 , where 4 N is the total number of rounds (communications between the two clients) of the protocol. Thus, the protocol is optimistic, as cheating is not successful, and the clients rarely have to contact Trent to confirm their honesty by delivering the actual signed certificates of the contract. Unlike the previous protocol (Paunković et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 062331 (2011)), in the present proposal, a single client can obtain the signed contract alone, without the need for the other client’s presence. When first contacting Trent, the clients do not have to agree upon a definitive contract. Moreover, even upon terminating the protocol, the clients do not reveal the actual contract to Trent. Finally, the protocol is based on the laws of physics, rather than on mathematical conjectures and the exchange of a large number of signed authenticated messages during the actual contract signing process. Therefore, it is abuse-free, as Alice and Bob cannot prove they are involved in the contract signing process.

arXiv:1711.09843•Entropy•Aug 22, 2019•11 citations

An entanglement-free authenticated quantum key distribution protocol

Xiaohang Li, Shuai Li, Jian Li +1 more

Quantum Information Processing•Nov 12, 2025•3 citations
We present a quantum scheme for signing contracts between two clients (Alice and Bob) using entangled states and the services of a third trusted party (Trent). The trusted party is only contacted for the initialization of the protocol, and possibly at the end, to verify clients’ honesty and deliver signed certificates. The protocol is fair, i.e., the probability that a client, say Bob, can obtain a signed copy of the contract, while Alice cannot, can be made arbitrarily small, and scales as N − 1 / 2 , where 4 N is the total number of rounds (communications between the two clients) of the protocol. Thus, the protocol is optimistic, as cheating is not successful, and the clients rarely have to contact Trent to confirm their honesty by delivering the actual signed certificates of the contract. Unlike the previous protocol (Paunković et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 062331 (2011)), in the present proposal, a single client can obtain the signed contract alone, without the need for the other client’s presence. When first contacting Trent, the clients do not have to agree upon a definitive contract. Moreover, even upon terminating the protocol, the clients do not reveal the actual contract to Trent. Finally, the protocol is based on the laws of physics, rather than on mathematical conjectures and the exchange of a large number of signed authenticated messages during the actual contract signing process. Therefore, it is abuse-free, as Alice and Bob cannot prove they are involved in the contract signing process.