Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Helium trimers and tetramers in two dimensions and quasi-two-dimensions

Leandra Vranješ Markić, Srećko Kilić

Published Apr 1, 2002• 13 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The ground-state properties of ${}^{3}\mathrm{He}$ and ${}^{4}\mathrm{He}$ trimers and tetramers in infinite and restricted two-dimensional and quasi-two-dimensional (2D) space are studied. Using Monte Carlo calculation in two stages successively, simple variational Monte Carlo and diffusion Monte Carlo, we find that all trimers (except one of ${}^{3}\mathrm{He}$ with spin 3/2) and tetramers are bound. In infinite 2D space the binding energy of ${}^{4}\mathrm{He}$ trimer is $\ensuremath{-}183(1) \mathrm{mK}$ and of tetramer $\ensuremath{-}435(1) \mathrm{mK}.$ In the same environment for ${}^{3}\mathrm{He},$ using Jastrow-Feenberg-Bruch wave functions trimer (spin 1/2) is bound with $\ensuremath{-}0.013(1) \mathrm{mK}$ and tetramer with $\ensuremath{-}0.021(1) \mathrm{mK}.$ Employing in the same procedure ``dimerlike'' wave functions for ${}^{3}\mathrm{He}$ molecules in infinite 2D space it is discovered that trimer prefers the structure of one dimer and one separate particle while a composition of two separate dimers is preferable for tetramer. In this case binding energies are $\ensuremath{-}0.020(1) \mathrm{mK}$ for trimer and $\ensuremath{-}0.040(1) \mathrm{mK}$ for tetramer. The binding energies of mixed molecules in infinite 2D space are $\ensuremath{-}74.3(4)$ mK ${(}^{3}\mathrm{He}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}{\mathrm{He}}_{2});$ $\ensuremath{-}14(1)$ mK ${(}^{3}{\mathrm{He}}_{2}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}\mathrm{He});$ $\ensuremath{-}254(4)$ mK ${(}^{3}\mathrm{He}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}{\mathrm{He}}_{3});$ $\ensuremath{-}118(2)$ mK ${(}^{3}{\mathrm{He}}_{2}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}{\mathrm{He}}_{2});$ $\ensuremath{-}11(1)$ mK ${(}^{3}{\mathrm{He}}_{3}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}\mathrm{He}).$ In holding potentials with well-adjusted parameters there is a drastic increase of binding for trimer and tetramer in both sorts of helium atoms.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.65.042506

Related papers

Linear correlations between 4 He trimer and tetramer energies calculated with various realistic 4 He potentials

Emiko Hiyama, M. Kamimura

In a previous work [Phys. Rev. A 85, 022502 (2012)] we calculated, with the use of the Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems, the energy levels and spatial structures of the ${}^{4}$He trimer and tetramer ground and excited states using the LM2M2 potential, which has a very strong short-range repulsion. In this work, we calculate the same quantities using the currently most accurate ${}^{4}$He-${}^{4}$He potential [Przybytek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183003 (2010)] that includes the adiabatic, relativistic, QED, and residual retardation corrections. Contributions of the corrections to the tetramer ground-(excited-) state energy $\ensuremath{-}573.90\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{-}132.70)$ mK are respectively $\ensuremath{-}4.13\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{-}1.52)$ mK, $+9.37\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(+3.48)$ mK, $\ensuremath{-}1.20\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{-}0.46)$ mK, and $+0.16\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(+0.07)$ mK. Further including other realistic ${}^{4}$He potentials, we calculated the binding energies of the trimer and tetramer ground and excited states, ${B}_{3}^{(0)},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{B}_{3}^{(1)},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{B}_{4}^{(0)}$, and ${B}_{4}^{(1)}$, respectively. We found that the four kinds of the binding energies for the different potentials exhibit perfect linear correlations between any two of them over the range of binding energies relevant for ${}^{4}$He atoms (namely, six types of the generalized Tjon lines are observed). The dimerlike-pair model for ${}^{4}$He clusters, proposed in the previous work, predicts a simple interaction-independent relation $\frac{{B}_{4}^{(1)}}{{B}_{2}}=\frac{{B}_{3}^{(0)}}{{B}_{2}}+\frac{2}{3}$, which precisely explains the correlation between the tetramer excited-state energy and the trimer ground-state energy, with ${B}_{2}$ being the dimer binding energy.

arXiv:1203.3130•Physical Review A•Jun 6, 2012•52 citations

Variational calculation of 4 He tetramer ground and excited states using a realistic pair potential

Emiko Hiyama, M. Kamimura

We calculated the ${}^{4}$He trimer and tetramer ground and excited states with the LM2M2 potential using our Gaussian expansion method for ab initio variational calculations of few-body systems. The method has been extensively used for a variety of three-, four-, and five-body systems in nuclear physics and exotic atomic and molecular physics. The trimer (tetramer) wave function is expanded in terms of symmetric three- (four-) body Gaussian basis functions, ranging from very compact to very diffuse, without assumption of any pair correlation function. The calculated results for the trimer ground and excited states are in excellent agreement with values reported in the literature. The binding energies of the tetramer ground and excited states are obtained as 558.98 and 127.33 mK (0.93 mK below the trimer ground state), respectively. We found that precisely the same shape of the short-range correlation (${r}_{ij}\ensuremath{\lesssim}4$ \AA{}) in the dimer appears in the ground and excited states of the trimer and tetramer. The overlap function between the trimer excited state and the dimer ground state and that between the tetramer excited state and the trimer ground state are almost proportional to the dimer wave function in the asymptotic region (up to $\ensuremath{\sim}$1000 \AA{}). Also, the pair correlation functions of trimer and tetramer excited states are almost proportional to the squared dimer wave function. We then propose a model which predicts the binding energy of the first excited state of ${}^{4}$He${}_{N}$ ($N\ensuremath{\ge}3$) measured from the ${}^{4}$He${}_{N\ensuremath{-}1}$ ground state to be nearly $\frac{N}{2(N\ensuremath{-}1)}{B}_{2}$ where ${B}_{2}$ is the dimer binding energy.

arXiv:1111.4370•Physical Review A•Feb 2, 2012•58 citations

Quantum Halo States in Helium Tetramers

Petar Stipanović, Leandra Vranješ Markić, Jordi Boronat

The universality of quantum halo states enables a comparison of systems from different fields of physics, as demonstrated in two- and three-body clusters. In the present work, we studied weakly bound helium tetramers in order to test whether some of these four-body realistic systems qualify as halos. Their ground-state binding energies and structural properties were thoroughly estimated using the diffusion Monte Carlo method with pure estimators. Helium tetramer properties proved to be less sensitive on the potential model than previously evaluated trimer properties. We predict the existence of realistic four-body halo 4 He 2 3 He 2, whereas 4 He 4 and 4 He 3 3 He are close to the border and thus can be used as prototypes of quasi-halo systems. Our results could be tested by the experimental determination of the tetramers’ structural properties using a setup similar to the one developed for the study of helium trimers.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry A•Dec 15, 2016•7 citations

Ground state of small mixed helium and spin-polarized tritium clusters: A quantum Monte Carlo study

Petar Stipanović, Leandra Vranješ Markić, Jordi Boronat +1 more

We report results for the ground-state energy and structural properties of small (4)He-T↓ clusters consisting of up to four T↓ and eight (4)He atoms. These results have been obtained using very well-known (4)He-(4)He and T↓- T↓ interaction potentials and several models for the (4)He- T↓ interatomic potential. All the calculations have been performed with variational and diffusion Monte Carlo methods. It takes at least three atoms to form a mixed bound state. In particular, for small clusters the binding energies are significantly affected by the precise form of the (4)He- T↓ interatomic potential but the stability limits remain unchanged. The only exception is the (4)He(2)T↓ trimer whose stability in the case of the weakest (4)He- T↓ interaction potential is uncertain while it seems stable for other potentials. The mixed trimer (4)He(T↓)(2), a candidate for the Borromean state, is not bound. All other studied clusters are stable. Some of the weakest bound clusters can be classified as quantum halo as a consequence of having high probability of being in a classically forbidden region.

arXiv:1012.3262•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 2, 2011•16 citations

Variational Study of Fermionic Helium Dimer and Trimer in Two Dimensions

Leandra Vranješ Markić, Srećko Kilić

In variational calculation, we have obtained the binding energy of helium 3 dimer in two dimensions.The existence of one bound state, with the binding energy -0.014 mK, has been definitively found.Also, the existence of a binding state of helium 3 trimer having spin -1/2 with the energy below -0.0057 mK is indicated.This reopens the question of the existence of the gas phase of many helium 3 atoms on the surface of superfluid helium 4. Key words: helium dimer, helium trimer, binding energy of helium 3 dimer. # Dedicated to Academician Krunoslav Ljolje on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Croatica Chemica Acta•Dec 4, 2000•1 citation

Binding and structure of tetramers in the scaling limit

M. R. Hadizadeh, Marcelo Takeshi Yamashita, Lauro Tomio +2 more

The momentum-space structure of the Faddeev-Yakubovsky (FY) components of weakly bound tetramers is investigated at the unitary limit using a renormalized zero-range two-body interaction. The results, obtained by considering a given trimer level with binding energy ${B}_{3}$, provide further support to a universal scaling function relating the binding energies of two successive tetramer states. The correlated scaling between the tetramer energies comes from the sensitivity of the four-boson system to a short-range four-body scale. Each excited $N$th tetramer energy ${B}_{4}^{(N)}$ moves as the short-range four-body scale changes, while the trimer properties are kept fixed, with the next excited tetramer ${B}_{4}^{(N+1)}$ emerging from the atom-trimer threshold for a universal ratio ${B}_{4}^{(N)}/{B}_{3}={B}_{4}^{(N)}/{B}_{4}^{(N+1)}\ensuremath{\simeq}4.6$, which does not depend on $N$. We show that both channels of the FY decomposition [atom-trimer ($K$ type) and dimer-dimer ($H$ type)] present high-momentum tails that reflect the short-range four-body scale. We also found that the $H$ channel is favored over the $K$ channel at low momentum, when the four-body momentum scale largely overcomes the three-body scale.

arXiv:1110.5214•Physical Review A•Feb 8, 2012•33 citations
The ground-state properties of 3He{}^{3}\mathrm{He}3He and 4He{}^{4}\mathrm{He}4He trimers and tetramers in infinite and restricted two-dimensional and quasi-two-dimensional (2D) space are studied. Using Monte Carlo calculation in two stages successively, simple variational Monte Carlo and diffusion Monte Carlo, we find that all trimers (except one of 3He{}^{3}\mathrm{He}3He with spin 3/2) and tetramers are bound. In infinite 2D space the binding energy of 4He{}^{4}\mathrm{He}4He trimer is \ensuremath−183(1)mK\ensuremath{-}183(1) \mathrm{mK}\ensuremath−183(1)mK and of tetramer \ensuremath−435(1)mK.\ensuremath{-}435(1) \mathrm{mK}.\ensuremath−435(1)mK. In the same environment for 3He,{}^{3}\mathrm{He},3He, using Jastrow-Feenberg-Bruch wave functions trimer (spin 1/2) is bound with \ensuremath−0.013(1)mK\ensuremath{-}0.013(1) \mathrm{mK}\ensuremath−0.013(1)mK and tetramer with \ensuremath−0.021(1)mK.\ensuremath{-}0.021(1) \mathrm{mK}.\ensuremath−0.021(1)mK. Employing in the same procedure ``dimerlike'' wave functions for 3He{}^{3}\mathrm{He}3He molecules in infinite 2D space it is discovered that trimer prefers the structure of one dimer and one separate particle while a composition of two separate dimers is preferable for tetramer. In this case binding energies are \ensuremath−0.020(1)mK\ensuremath{-}0.020(1) \mathrm{mK}\ensuremath−0.020(1)mK for trimer and \ensuremath−0.040(1)mK\ensuremath{-}0.040(1) \mathrm{mK}\ensuremath−0.040(1)mK for tetramer. The binding energies of mixed molecules in infinite 2D space are \ensuremath−74.3(4)\ensuremath{-}74.3(4)\ensuremath−74.3(4) mK (3He\ensuremath−4He2);{(}^{3}\mathrm{He}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}{\mathrm{He}}_{2});(3He\ensuremath−4He2​); \ensuremath−14(1)\ensuremath{-}14(1)\ensuremath−14(1) mK (3He2\ensuremath−4He);{(}^{3}{\mathrm{He}}_{2}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}\mathrm{He});(3He2​\ensuremath−4He); \ensuremath−254(4)\ensuremath{-}254(4)\ensuremath−254(4) mK (3He\ensuremath−4He3);{(}^{3}\mathrm{He}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}{\mathrm{He}}_{3});(3He\ensuremath−4He3​); \ensuremath−118(2)\ensuremath{-}118(2)\ensuremath−118(2) mK (3He2\ensuremath−4He2);{(}^{3}{\mathrm{He}}_{2}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}{\mathrm{He}}_{2});(3He2​\ensuremath−4He2​); \ensuremath−11(1)\ensuremath{-}11(1)\ensuremath−11(1) mK (3He3\ensuremath−4He).{(}^{3}{\mathrm{He}}_{3}{\ensuremath{-}}^{4}\mathrm{He}).(3He3​\ensuremath−4He). In holding potentials with well-adjusted parameters there is a drastic increase of binding for trimer and tetramer in both sorts of helium atoms.
In a previous work [Phys. Rev. A 85, 022502 (2012)] we calculated, with the use of the Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems, the energy levels and spatial structures of the 4{}^{4}4He trimer and tetramer ground and excited states using the LM2M2 potential, which has a very strong short-range repulsion. In this work, we calculate the same quantities using the currently most accurate 4{}^{4}4He-4{}^{4}4He potential [Przybytek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183003 (2010)] that includes the adiabatic, relativistic, QED, and residual retardation corrections. Contributions of the corrections to the tetramer ground-(excited-) state energy $\ensuremath{-}573.90\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{-}132.70)$ mK are respectively $\ensuremath{-}4.13\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{-}1.52)$ mK, +9.37(+3.48)+9.37\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(+3.48)+9.37(+3.48) mK, $\ensuremath{-}1.20\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{-}0.46)$ mK, and +0.16(+0.07)+0.16\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(+0.07)+0.16(+0.07) mK. Further including other realistic 4{}^{4}4He potentials, we calculated the binding energies of the trimer and tetramer ground and excited states, B3(0),B3(1),B4(0){B}_{3}^{(0)},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{B}_{3}^{(1)},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{B}_{4}^{(0)}B3(0)​,B3(1)​,B4(0)​, and B4(1){B}_{4}^{(1)}B4(1)​, respectively. We found that the four kinds of the binding energies for the different potentials exhibit perfect linear correlations between any two of them over the range of binding energies relevant for 4{}^{4}4He atoms (namely, six types of the generalized Tjon lines are observed). The dimerlike-pair model for 4{}^{4}4He clusters, proposed in the previous work, predicts a simple interaction-independent relation B4(1)B2=B3(0)B2+23\frac{{B}_{4}^{(1)}}{{B}_{2}}=\frac{{B}_{3}^{(0)}}{{B}_{2}}+\frac{2}{3}B2​B4(1)​​=B2​B3(0)​​+32​, which precisely explains the correlation between the tetramer excited-state energy and the trimer ground-state energy, with B2{B}_{2}B2​ being the dimer binding energy.
We calculated the 4{}^{4}4He trimer and tetramer ground and excited states with the LM2M2 potential using our Gaussian expansion method for ab initio variational calculations of few-body systems. The method has been extensively used for a variety of three-, four-, and five-body systems in nuclear physics and exotic atomic and molecular physics. The trimer (tetramer) wave function is expanded in terms of symmetric three- (four-) body Gaussian basis functions, ranging from very compact to very diffuse, without assumption of any pair correlation function. The calculated results for the trimer ground and excited states are in excellent agreement with values reported in the literature. The binding energies of the tetramer ground and excited states are obtained as 558.98 and 127.33 mK (0.93 mK below the trimer ground state), respectively. We found that precisely the same shape of the short-range correlation (${r}_{ij}\ensuremath{\lesssim}4$ \AA{}) in the dimer appears in the ground and excited states of the trimer and tetramer. The overlap function between the trimer excited state and the dimer ground state and that between the tetramer excited state and the trimer ground state are almost proportional to the dimer wave function in the asymptotic region (up to $\ensuremath{\sim}$1000 \AA{}). Also, the pair correlation functions of trimer and tetramer excited states are almost proportional to the squared dimer wave function. We then propose a model which predicts the binding energy of the first excited state of 4{}^{4}4HeN{}_{N}N​ ($N\ensuremath{\ge}3$) measured from the 4{}^{4}4He${}_{N\ensuremath{-}1}$ ground state to be nearly $\frac{N}{2(N\ensuremath{-}1)}{B}_{2}$ where B2{B}_{2}B2​ is the dimer binding energy.
The universality of quantum halo states enables a comparison of systems from different fields of physics, as demonstrated in two- and three-body clusters. In the present work, we studied weakly bound helium tetramers in order to test whether some of these four-body realistic systems qualify as halos. Their ground-state binding energies and structural properties were thoroughly estimated using the diffusion Monte Carlo method with pure estimators. Helium tetramer properties proved to be less sensitive on the potential model than previously evaluated trimer properties. We predict the existence of realistic four-body halo 4 He 2 3 He 2, whereas 4 He 4 and 4 He 3 3 He are close to the border and thus can be used as prototypes of quasi-halo systems. Our results could be tested by the experimental determination of the tetramers’ structural properties using a setup similar to the one developed for the study of helium trimers.
We report results for the ground-state energy and structural properties of small (4)He-T↓ clusters consisting of up to four T↓ and eight (4)He atoms. These results have been obtained using very well-known (4)He-(4)He and T↓- T↓ interaction potentials and several models for the (4)He- T↓ interatomic potential. All the calculations have been performed with variational and diffusion Monte Carlo methods. It takes at least three atoms to form a mixed bound state. In particular, for small clusters the binding energies are significantly affected by the precise form of the (4)He- T↓ interatomic potential but the stability limits remain unchanged. The only exception is the (4)He(2)T↓ trimer whose stability in the case of the weakest (4)He- T↓ interaction potential is uncertain while it seems stable for other potentials. The mixed trimer (4)He(T↓)(2), a candidate for the Borromean state, is not bound. All other studied clusters are stable. Some of the weakest bound clusters can be classified as quantum halo as a consequence of having high probability of being in a classically forbidden region.
In variational calculation, we have obtained the binding energy of helium 3 dimer in two dimensions.The existence of one bound state, with the binding energy -0.014 mK, has been definitively found.Also, the existence of a binding state of helium 3 trimer having spin -1/2 with the energy below -0.0057 mK is indicated.This reopens the question of the existence of the gas phase of many helium 3 atoms on the surface of superfluid helium 4. Key words: helium dimer, helium trimer, binding energy of helium 3 dimer. # Dedicated to Academician Krunoslav Ljolje on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
The momentum-space structure of the Faddeev-Yakubovsky (FY) components of weakly bound tetramers is investigated at the unitary limit using a renormalized zero-range two-body interaction. The results, obtained by considering a given trimer level with binding energy B3{B}_{3}B3​, provide further support to a universal scaling function relating the binding energies of two successive tetramer states. The correlated scaling between the tetramer energies comes from the sensitivity of the four-boson system to a short-range four-body scale. Each excited NNNth tetramer energy B4(N){B}_{4}^{(N)}B4(N)​ moves as the short-range four-body scale changes, while the trimer properties are kept fixed, with the next excited tetramer B4(N+1){B}_{4}^{(N+1)}B4(N+1)​ emerging from the atom-trimer threshold for a universal ratio ${B}_{4}^{(N)}/{B}_{3}={B}_{4}^{(N)}/{B}_{4}^{(N+1)}\ensuremath{\simeq}4.6$, which does not depend on NNN. We show that both channels of the FY decomposition [atom-trimer (KKK type) and dimer-dimer (HHH type)] present high-momentum tails that reflect the short-range four-body scale. We also found that the HHH channel is favored over the KKK channel at low momentum, when the four-body momentum scale largely overcomes the three-body scale.