Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Observables, maximal symmetric operators and POV measures in quantum mechanics

K. Kong Wan, Robert H. Fountain, Z Y Tao

Published Apr 21, 1995• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

There has been a lot of interest in generalizing orthodox quantum mechanics to include POV measures as observables, namely as unsharp observables. Such POV measures are related to symmetric operators. The present paper examines how symmetric operators arise and how they can represent observables.
DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/28/8/028

Related papers

Observables, maximal symmetric operators, POV measures and their applications in quantum mechanics

Robert H. Fountain

Approximate observables, their description in terms of POV measures and \nthe subsequent extension of the orthodox notion of observable are examined. \nThe sense in which the approximate observables are non-ideal observables \nis considered and a generalised concept of ideal observable is proposed. The \nconventional requirement of self-adjointness is relaxed to one of maximal \nsymmetry and the PV measures are replaced by the larger set of generalised \nspectral measures of maximal symmetric operators. The implications for \nthe quantisation problem are discussed and we give some new examples of \nobservables which have no orthodox representation, i.e. observables which \ncan be identified with non-self-adjoint maximal symmetric operators. Particular \nattention is paid to those aspects of the orthodox theory which rely \non specific properties of self-adjoint operators, such as their association with \nthe infinitesimal generators of groups of unitary operators, and we look at \nthe analogous properties in our generalised theory.

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Operational Quantum Physics

John L. Safko

This tome is a formal presentation of the unsharp observable approach to quantum mechanics using the positive operator valued (POV) concept of an observable. It is intended for philosophers and mathematicians as well as physicists. This is a very formalistic book. There are, however, portions that should be read by all experimentalists performing quantum mechanical studies as well as graduate students completing their first graduate year quantum mechanics course. If we interpret quantum mechanics as making statistical predictions on the results of states prepared in identical fashions, we will often find that the observed probabilities are nearly, but not exactly, the expected 1 or 0 for measurements that are expected to always give the same result. Hence, rather than demanding sharp measures with probabilities of exactly 1 or 0, quantum mechanics allows a reasonable interpretation of unsharp results of nearly 1 or nearly 0. As the authors point out in chapter II, POV measures and the associated unsharp measures are not essential for an interpretation of quantum mechanical results. However, more sharp variables, and hence a larger Hilbert space, will be needed than are required by the unsharp approach. Also, the theoretical interpretation will often not be as straightforward with only sharp observables. As I have previously stated, all graduate students, both those of a theoretical and those of an experimental bent, should read parts of this book (after they have completed a normal introduction using sharp variables). They should at least read the first chapter which explains the unsharp variable measure concept as well as giving some examples, one of which is the Stern - Gerlach experiment. In chapter VII, the last chapter, the Stern - Gerlach experiment photon polarization and other quantum optical experiments and wave-particle duality experiments for photons are examined in detail using the POV formalism. This would also be an excellent chapter for all graduate students to read. Some sections may send them back to some of the intermediate chapters, hopefully to peruse in greater detail. The intermediate chapters contain the formal development of the POV formalism and compare it to the normal method. There is also a brief introduction to measurement theory using unsharp observables. As the authors state, this is not intended to be a complete solution to the problem of measurement theory. The next two chapters deal with uncertainty and phase space formalism as considered by the unsharp observables. Philosophers of physics and mathematicians will find this an excellent introduction to the POV formalism and the distinction between sharp and unsharp measurements. Many texts will gloss over both the philosophical and mathematical consequences inherent in the full statistical formalism of quantum mechanics. This monograph is not, by the authors' admission, a full treatment of quantum measurement theory. Also, although in the introduction the authors discuss the importance of applying quantum mechanics to individual objects, this book mainly considers the interpretations as statistical measures. There is little attempt to deal with the quantum mechanical interpretations of the behaviour of a single particle. That is, questions about measurements on a single particle or the interpretation of the wavefunction for a single particle are not fully covered. The authors claim that the POV approach is also the best for individual systems, but do little in applications. The major example given is in the last chapter where they consider interference measurements for single photons. They might have referenced more of the current alternative approaches to measurement theory of single particle wavefunctions. The readers of this journal will be disappointed, but not surprised, that the covariant nature of observables is restricted almost entirely to the Galilei group. The only Poincare group material is the example of photon localization in the last chapter. This is a reflection of the great difficulty of applying the special or the general theories of relativity to the Hilbert space formalism.

Classical and Quantum Gravity•Mar 1, 1996•69 citations

Bohr's theory of measurement

Dugald R. Murdoch

I propose now to examine Bohr's informal theory of measurement from a somewhat more formal point of view, and to consider how his theory relates to the orthodox theory of measurement in quantum mechanics. This is a difficult task, since Bohr nowhere discusses the theory of measurement in formal terms. My discussion, therefore, will be less closely tied to Bohr's own statements. I shall also consider some important objections to the theory. The objective-values theory of measurement Before we look into this theory, it will be useful to have a brief sketch of some of the relevant formal elements of quantum mechanics. In the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics the measurable physical properties (‘observables’) of an object are represented by linear Hermitian operators A , B , … which have complete orthonormal sets of eigenvalues a n , b n , … corresponding to the subspaces (closed linear manifolds) of a Hilbert space H . These operators are in one-to-one correspondence with the projection measures P A , P B , … on the Hilbert space such that P A = Σ n a n P n , where P n are the projections of the eigenvectors ψ n belonging to the eigenvalues a n of A , and a n are discrete, non-degenerate values (for simplicity I shall deal only with operators which have such values, and shall denote observables and the corresponding operators by the same symbols).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 5, 1987•0 citations

Minimal uncertainty and maximal information for quantum position and momentum

Paul Busch, PEKKA J. LAHTI

In view of the recently proposed entropic uncertainty relations several characterisations of 'maximal information' and 'minimal uncertainty' are compared and applied to position and momentum. It is argued that a sufficiently refined entropic uncertainty relation might require the general concept of POV observables as used in stochastic quantum mechanics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 11, 1987•9 citations

Quantum observables: Compatibility versus commutativity and maximal information

Paul Busch, Thomas P. Schonbek, Franklin E. Schroeck

Two different approaches to a characterization of the degree of (in)compatibility of quantum observables are investigated. First, recent examples of the (partial) commutativity of spectral measures of incompatible observables are proved to be generic. The analysis is extended to the case of compatible or incompatible unsharp, or stochastic observables, leading to a general criterion for commutativity of position and momentum effects. Further, a recently proposed information theoretic quantification of the (in)compatibility of noncommuting observables is generalized, and the relation between ‘‘maximal information,’’ ‘‘minimal uncertainty,’’ partial commutativity, and strict correlation is further clarified. Both approaches are illustrated in a number of examples.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1987•23 citations

Intrinsic and Operational Observables in Quantum Mechanics

Piotr Kochański, Krzysztof Wódkiewicz

The concept of intrinsic and operational observables in quantum mechanics is introduced. It is argued that, in any realistic description of a quantum measurement that includes a detecting device, it is possible to construct from the statistics of the recorded raw data a set of operational quantities that correspond to the intrinsic quantum mechanical observable. Using the concept of the propensity and the associated operational positive operator valued measure (POVM) a general description of the operational algebra of quantum mechanical observables is derived for a wide class of realistic detection schemes. This general approach is illustrated by the example of an operational Malus measurement of the spin phases and by an analysis of the operational homodyne detection of the phase of an optical field with a squeezed vacuum in the unused ports.

arXiv:quant-ph/9607008•Jul 10, 1996•0 citations
Approximate observables, their description in terms of POV measures and \nthe subsequent extension of the orthodox notion of observable are examined. \nThe sense in which the approximate observables are non-ideal observables \nis considered and a generalised concept of ideal observable is proposed. The \nconventional requirement of self-adjointness is relaxed to one of maximal \nsymmetry and the PV measures are replaced by the larger set of generalised \nspectral measures of maximal symmetric operators. The implications for \nthe quantisation problem are discussed and we give some new examples of \nobservables which have no orthodox representation, i.e. observables which \ncan be identified with non-self-adjoint maximal symmetric operators. Particular \nattention is paid to those aspects of the orthodox theory which rely \non specific properties of self-adjoint operators, such as their association with \nthe infinitesimal generators of groups of unitary operators, and we look at \nthe analogous properties in our generalised theory.
This tome is a formal presentation of the unsharp observable approach to quantum mechanics using the positive operator valued (POV) concept of an observable. It is intended for philosophers and mathematicians as well as physicists. This is a very formalistic book. There are, however, portions that should be read by all experimentalists performing quantum mechanical studies as well as graduate students completing their first graduate year quantum mechanics course. If we interpret quantum mechanics as making statistical predictions on the results of states prepared in identical fashions, we will often find that the observed probabilities are nearly, but not exactly, the expected 1 or 0 for measurements that are expected to always give the same result. Hence, rather than demanding sharp measures with probabilities of exactly 1 or 0, quantum mechanics allows a reasonable interpretation of unsharp results of nearly 1 or nearly 0. As the authors point out in chapter II, POV measures and the associated unsharp measures are not essential for an interpretation of quantum mechanical results. However, more sharp variables, and hence a larger Hilbert space, will be needed than are required by the unsharp approach. Also, the theoretical interpretation will often not be as straightforward with only sharp observables. As I have previously stated, all graduate students, both those of a theoretical and those of an experimental bent, should read parts of this book (after they have completed a normal introduction using sharp variables). They should at least read the first chapter which explains the unsharp variable measure concept as well as giving some examples, one of which is the Stern - Gerlach experiment. In chapter VII, the last chapter, the Stern - Gerlach experiment photon polarization and other quantum optical experiments and wave-particle duality experiments for photons are examined in detail using the POV formalism. This would also be an excellent chapter for all graduate students to read. Some sections may send them back to some of the intermediate chapters, hopefully to peruse in greater detail. The intermediate chapters contain the formal development of the POV formalism and compare it to the normal method. There is also a brief introduction to measurement theory using unsharp observables. As the authors state, this is not intended to be a complete solution to the problem of measurement theory. The next two chapters deal with uncertainty and phase space formalism as considered by the unsharp observables. Philosophers of physics and mathematicians will find this an excellent introduction to the POV formalism and the distinction between sharp and unsharp measurements. Many texts will gloss over both the philosophical and mathematical consequences inherent in the full statistical formalism of quantum mechanics. This monograph is not, by the authors' admission, a full treatment of quantum measurement theory. Also, although in the introduction the authors discuss the importance of applying quantum mechanics to individual objects, this book mainly considers the interpretations as statistical measures. There is little attempt to deal with the quantum mechanical interpretations of the behaviour of a single particle. That is, questions about measurements on a single particle or the interpretation of the wavefunction for a single particle are not fully covered. The authors claim that the POV approach is also the best for individual systems, but do little in applications. The major example given is in the last chapter where they consider interference measurements for single photons. They might have referenced more of the current alternative approaches to measurement theory of single particle wavefunctions. The readers of this journal will be disappointed, but not surprised, that the covariant nature of observables is restricted almost entirely to the Galilei group. The only Poincare group material is the example of photon localization in the last chapter. This is a reflection of the great difficulty of applying the special or the general theories of relativity to the Hilbert space formalism.
I propose now to examine Bohr's informal theory of measurement from a somewhat more formal point of view, and to consider how his theory relates to the orthodox theory of measurement in quantum mechanics. This is a difficult task, since Bohr nowhere discusses the theory of measurement in formal terms. My discussion, therefore, will be less closely tied to Bohr's own statements. I shall also consider some important objections to the theory. The objective-values theory of measurement Before we look into this theory, it will be useful to have a brief sketch of some of the relevant formal elements of quantum mechanics. In the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics the measurable physical properties (‘observables’) of an object are represented by linear Hermitian operators A , B , … which have complete orthonormal sets of eigenvalues a n , b n , … corresponding to the subspaces (closed linear manifolds) of a Hilbert space H . These operators are in one-to-one correspondence with the projection measures P A , P B , … on the Hilbert space such that P A = Σ n a n P n , where P n are the projections of the eigenvectors ψ n belonging to the eigenvalues a n of A , and a n are discrete, non-degenerate values (for simplicity I shall deal only with operators which have such values, and shall denote observables and the corresponding operators by the same symbols).
Two different approaches to a characterization of the degree of (in)compatibility of quantum observables are investigated. First, recent examples of the (partial) commutativity of spectral measures of incompatible observables are proved to be generic. The analysis is extended to the case of compatible or incompatible unsharp, or stochastic observables, leading to a general criterion for commutativity of position and momentum effects. Further, a recently proposed information theoretic quantification of the (in)compatibility of noncommuting observables is generalized, and the relation between ‘‘maximal information,’’ ‘‘minimal uncertainty,’’ partial commutativity, and strict correlation is further clarified. Both approaches are illustrated in a number of examples.
The concept of intrinsic and operational observables in quantum mechanics is introduced. It is argued that, in any realistic description of a quantum measurement that includes a detecting device, it is possible to construct from the statistics of the recorded raw data a set of operational quantities that correspond to the intrinsic quantum mechanical observable. Using the concept of the propensity and the associated operational positive operator valued measure (POVM) a general description of the operational algebra of quantum mechanical observables is derived for a wide class of realistic detection schemes. This general approach is illustrated by the example of an operational Malus measurement of the spin phases and by an analysis of the operational homodyne detection of the phase of an optical field with a squeezed vacuum in the unused ports.