Relativistic models for two concepts for detecting gravitational waves with atom interferometers are presented and their features discussed. We calculate the phase difference due to a gravitational wave of an atom interferometer in a Ramsey–Bordé configuration. A general expression for the phase is presented including the case that the center of mass of the device and the center of symmetry of the matter wave trajectories do not coincide. The sensitivity of atom interferometers and laser interferometers are then compared for the detection in the low and high frequency regimes. Finally, we calculate the phase difference due to a gravitational wave of an atom gravimeter, and discuss possible strategies to solve the problem of the phase noise and of the measurement frequency.
Relativistic models for two concepts for detecting gravitational waves with atom interferometers are presented and their features discussed. We calculate the phase difference due to a gravitational wave of an atom interferometer in a Ramsey–Bordé configuration. A general expression for the phase is presented including the case that the center of mass of the device and the center of symmetry of the matter wave trajectories do not coincide. The sensitivity of atom interferometers and laser interferometers are then compared for the detection in the low and high frequency regimes. Finally, we calculate the phase difference due to a gravitational wave of an atom gravimeter, and discuss possible strategies to solve the problem of the phase noise and of the measurement frequency.
There now exists in the literature two different expressions for the phase shift of a matter-wave interferometer caused by the passage of a gravitation wave. The first, a commonly accepted expression that was first derived in the 1970s, is based on the traditional geodesic equation of motion (EOM) for a test particle. The second, a more recently derived expression, is based on the geodesic deviation EOM. The power-law dependence on the frequency of the gravitational wave for both expressions for the phase shift is different, which indicates fundamental differences in the physics on which these calculations are based. Here we compare the two approaches by presenting a series of side-by-side calculations of the phase shift for one specific matter-wave-interferometer configuration that uses atoms as the interfering particle. By looking at the low-frequency limit of the different expressions for the phase shift obtained, we find that the phase shift calculated via the geodesic deviation EOM is correct, and the ones calculated via the geodesic EOM are not.
Atom interferometers measure quantum interference patterns in the wave functions of cold atoms that follow superpositions of different space-time trajectories. These can be sensitive to phase shifts induced by fundamental physics processes such as interactions with ultralight dark matter or the passage of gravitational waves. The capabilities of large-scale atom interferometers are illustrated by their estimated sensitivities to the possible interactions of ultralight dark matter with electrons and photons, and to gravitational waves in the frequency range around 1 Hz, intermediate between the peak sensitivities of the LIGO and LISA experiments. Atom interferometers can probe ultralight scalar couplings with much greater sensitivity than is currently available from probes of the Equivalence Principle. Their sensitivity to mid-frequency gravitational waves may open a window on mergers of masses intermediate between those discovered by the LIGO and Virgo experiments and the supermassive black holes present in the cores of galaxies, as well as fundamental physics processes in the early Universe such as first-order phase transitions and the evolution of networks of cosmic strings.
Atom interferometers (AIFs) are highly precise inertial sensors and are considered promising instruments for the detection of gravitational waves (GWs) and certain dark matter (DM) candidates in the mid-frequency band. While GW detection with AIFs was initially proposed for space-based experiments with baselines spanning thousands of kilometers, recent developments suggest that terrestrial setups with baselines of at least 100 meters may also be capable of detecting GWs. In this work, we analytically derive the GW phase response formula of a ground detector, find an additional term compared to the existing literature and check it our findings numerically. Based on this treatment, we analyze the optimal geometric parameters for earth-bound AIF experiments. Subsequently, we numerically simulate GW detection schemes for these optimized interferometers using an open-source Python algorithm. Numerical simulations of these schemes have are not available to the community, yet crucial for the accurate modeling of noise and non-trivial gravitational backgrounds.
The search for a fundamental, self-consistent theoretical framework to cover phenomena over all energy scales is possibly the most challenging quest of contemporary physics. Approaches to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity entail the modification of their foundations such as the equivalence principle. This corner stone of general relativity is suspected to be violated in various scenarios and is therefore under close scrutiny. Experiments based on the manipulation of cold atoms are excellently suited to challenge its different facets. Freely falling atoms constitute ideal test masses for tests of the universality of free fall in interferometric setups. Moreover, the superposition of internal energy eigenstates provides the notion of a clock, which allows to perform tests of the gravitational redshift. Furthermore, as atom interferometers constitute outstanding phasemeters, they hold the promise to detect gravitational waves, another integral aspect of general relativity. In recent years, atom interferometers have developed into versatile sensors with excellent accuracy and stability, and allow to probe physics at the interface of quantum mechanics and general relativity without classical analog. In this thesis, various aspects regarding tests of general relativity with atom interferometry have been theoretically investigated. This includes the analysis of fundamental effects as well as feasibility studies of experimental configurations. The work is partially focussed on a space-borne mission scenario for a dedicated quantum test of the universality of free fall beyond state-of-the-art by dropping matter waves of different elements. To enable the target accuracy at the level of 10^(−17), a compensation scheme has been developed and discussed, mitigating the detrimental effects of imperfect test mass co-location upon release and relaxing the requirements on the source preparation by several orders of magnitude. In addition, it was demonstrated that the careful design of quantum degenerate sources is indispensable for these experiments, requiring tailored schemes to prepare miscible binary sources. The possibility to test the gravitational redshift with atom interferometers has also been examined in this thesis and connected to the ideas of clock interferometry. With the proof that closed light pulse atom interferometers without transitions between internal internal states are not sensitive to gravitational time dilation, an ongoing scientific debate has been resolved. Instead, certain configurations were shown to implement a quantum version of the special-relativistic twin paradox, for which an experiment has been proposed. Finally, requirements on atomic sources and atom optics for scenarios of gravitational wave detection on ground and in space have been investigated.
This report presents the results of the 2012-2013 NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase 1 Atom Interferometry for Detection of Gravitational Waves project. The origin of this GW (Gravitational Wave) detection concept using atoms can be traced to theoretical work that first appeared in 2008 and also to a satellite mission-focused followup study that was done in 2011. The goal of the current project was to explore both theoretical and technical issues surrounding the implementation of this idea, as well as to begin performing proof-of-concept experiments to validate critical aspects of the proposal.The top level trade space for the detector design is driven by the strategy employed to mitigate laser frequency noise, which, if uncontrolled, can mask GW signatures. One of the advantages of the atom interferometric approach is the possibility of single baseline detection (Fig. 1.1), even in the presence of laser noise. This is enabled by the differential measurement between the two ensembles of atoms, which can result in substantial laser noise suppression. The details of this suppression depend on the atomic physics techniques used to implement the atom interferometry. Specifically, we considered the effect on noise suppression that results from using traditional two-photon Raman transitions (with alkali atoms) and also single-photon transitions (with alkaline earth-like atoms).The interferometers shown in Fig 1.1(b) take advantage of single-photon transitions (as opposed to traditional Raman transitions) because using light pulses from one direction at a time allows for near perfect common-mode cancellation of laser phase noise, even for long baselines. This calls for the use of atomic transitions with an (ideally large) optical energy level difference with a long (greater than 1 second) lifetime, such as high-transitions routinely used for optical atomic clocks in species like Sr, Ca and Yb. Notably, large momentum transfer (LMT) atom optics - and the sensitivity enhancement they confer – can still be realized by simply adding additional pairs of alternating pulses to each beam splitter process. Section 3 reports on the theoretical work we performed to justify this GW detection protocol using single-photon transitions. This approach represents a new method for GW detection using atoms that is distinct from the original proposal from 2008. At the system level, we evaluated three architectures, each of which implements a different solution to the laser frequency noise issue. The first two designs are based on two-photon Raman transitions with Rb atoms. One of these is a three-satellite, multiple baseline design while the other is a two-satellite, single baseline design. The third proposal is a two-satellite, single baseline design that uses single-photon transitions with Sr atoms. These three architectures are described in more detail in Section 2. There are a number of known technical issues that we have started to address using ground-based experiments. These issues include atom technology development needs such as, for example, lower ensemble temperature requirements and large momentum transfer (LMT) atom optics. To this end, we have built a 10-meter scale atom drop tower, where we can perform proof-of-principle demonstrations of the proposed AGIS detector in an environment that permits more than 2.5 seconds of free-fall time. This facility allows for demonstration of atom interferometry with long interrogation time (seconds) and large atom wavepacket
Abstract Recent advances in quantum sensing—optical clocks at 5.5 × 10 − 19 systematic uncertainty, frequency-dependent squeezing below the standard quantum limit, quantum magnetometers approaching fundamental sensitivity limits—raise a natural question: can these technologies detect gravitational waves directly, or enhance existing detectors beyond current capabilities? We show that the answer is primarily determined by the coupling mechanism between the gravitational wave and the sensor. Starting from the tidal Hamiltonian in Fermi normal coordinates, we identify three physically distinct mechanisms by which a gravitational wave couples directly to a quantum system, and derive their transducer gains within linearized general relativity and non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Internal atomic coupling (tidal distortion of electronic wavefunctions) yields a transducer gain G A = 2.4 × 10 − 20 , with vanishing first-order energy shifts for all J = 0 clock states—a ∼ 10 35 deficit relative to laser interferometry that exceeds any projected quantum enhancement. Center-of-mass coupling (Doppler shifts from geodesic motion) reaches strain sensitivities of ∼ 10 − 18 , still 10 4 above LISA requirements. Light propagation coupling (phase accumulation over macroscopic baselines) provides the enormous transducer gain that makes laser interferometry—and atom interferometry—viable. For detectors exploiting this third mechanism, we quantify how much improvement quantum sensors can provide through the detector’s noise architecture: LISA’s noise budget is predominantly classical, limiting combined quantum enhancement to E ≈ 1.04 , while ground-based detectors in the shot-noise-dominated regime achieve E = 1.6 – 2.1 . Atom interferometers exploit the same light-propagation mechanism to target the 0.01–10 Hz band between the LISA and LIGO ranges.