Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

A lattice spacetime for the slit experiments of quantum mechanics

Paweł Góra, Abraham Boyarsky

Published Dec 1, 1997• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(97)00739-1

Related papers

Non-Euclidean spacetime structure and the two-slit experiment

Mohamed Saladin El Naschie

Chaos Solitons & Fractals•Apr 15, 2005•60 citations

What If the Electron Is a Spinning Filament of Spacetime? A Conceptual Model Explaining 14 Quantum Puzzles

sina sahebgaranii

This paper presents a conceptual model—not a mathematical theory—of the electron as a rotating filament of spacetime: a "spaghetti" that spins, stretches, and tangles. The model proposes a single, intuitive mechanism to explain fourteen long-standing puzzles in quantum mechanics, including wave-particle duality, wavefunction collapse, spin, the double-slit experiment, the Pauli exclusion principle, and the delayed-choice experiment. Important note: This is a conceptual framework under active development. The rigorous mathematical formulation and quantitative experimental predictions are not yet complete. The purpose of this preprint is to share the core ideas openly, establish priority, and invite collaboration from mathematicians and theoretical physicists interested in developing the formalism. Keywords: electron model, wave-particle duality, spacetime filament, rotating filament, quantum foundations, double-slit experiment, threshold black hole, conceptual model, spacetime torsion, Pauli exclusion principle, delayed-choice experiment, spin, g-factor

•Aug 12, 2026•0 citations

Elementary Quantum Mechanics in a Space-Time Lattice

Manjit Bhatia, P. Narayana Swamy

arXiv:1011.2544•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Feb 1, 2011•6 citations

Quantum mechanics on a space-time lattice using path integrals in a minkowski metric

Hrvoje J. Hrgovčić

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 1994•3 citations

Quantum Mechanics Within the Cartesian Relativity Framework: Resolving Double-Slit Anomalies through Algorithmic Rendering, Probabilistic Pruning, and the Energetic Lattice Tax

Anthony John Kerr

Abstract This paper resolves the wave-particle duality and the measurement problem of the double-slit experiment by applying the Cartesian Relativity Framework [1, 2]. We posit that quantum superposition exists strictly as an unrendered probability distribution within the "Backend" of spacetime—a domain devoid of geometric volume and physical time. The physical detection of a particle is a forced "Render Event" onto a discrete, integer-based coordinate topology. By defining the wave function as a continuous Gaussian probability curve mapping to a quantized physical lattice—governed by a fundamental "Resolution Limit" that removes the reliance on mathematical infinity—we provide a deterministic mechanism for Quantum Dithering, Probabilistic Pruning, and the energetic "Lattice Tax" required to maintain non-rendered states. We address potential critiques regarding non-local domains and the energy costs of entanglement, demonstrating how this framework provides superior macro-to-micro coherence over standard interpretations. Finally, we propose falsifiable observational metrics: the laboratory Jitter Shadow, Render Exclusion Zones, and the measurable energetic overhead of logical address synchronization. Footnotes / References: [1] Kerr, A. J. (2026). Cartesian Relativity and the Zeno Non-singularity: A Unified Theory of Quantum Rendered Spacetime and Elastic Coordinate Topology. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20046745 [2] Kerr, A. J. (2026). Cartesian Spacetime and Macroscopic Gravity: Topological Gradients, Data Collisions, and Planetary Hydrostatic Equilibrium. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20078172

•May 8, 2026•0 citations

Determinism In Quantum Slit-Experiments

Netherland, Albert V. ‎ Herrebrugh

A mathematical model for the slit experiments in the heart of quantum mechanics is developed to gain insight into quantum ‎theory. The proposed system-theoretical model is entirely based on commutative mathematics, i.e. convolution, and integral ‎transformations, and starts with spacetime functions with inherent energy-based cause and effect relations of the state-‎function Ѱ in the complex Hilbert space. The benefits of his approach are as 1-Invariance in time reversal. 2-Deterministic ‎result functions in the model in line with the outcome of slit experiments. 3- Separation of causality and cross-correlations of ‎attained states. 4- Disappearance of a posteriori probability of quantum states. 5- Quantum a priori fixed states after ‎causality interactions have ended, (even) when quanta are (light-years) separated. The model predicts the patterns in the ‎experiments with mathematical functions of the energy distributions. The quantum mechanical counterpart description of the ‎physical reality of slit experiments thus may be considered complete in A. Einstein’s definition. The patterns in double slit ‎experiments are found to be an effect of energy (amplitude-) modulation. An equivalent double-slit pattern can be retrieved ‎from an input modulated 1-slit experiment excluding interference interpretations. The system-theoretical model uses generic ‎properties of quanta and evolves into determinism in ‎quantum mechanics slit experiments. The mathematics in the model ‎handles beables by treatment ‎of momentum p in system theoretical I/O relations of the transformed functions and allows the ‎proposed description by the avoidance of a direct addressing of the individual quanta through variables. The following ‎method yields exact, non-probabilistic results.‎

Hyperscience International Journals•Sep 1, 2022•0 citations
This paper presents a conceptual model—not a mathematical theory—of the electron as a rotating filament of spacetime: a "spaghetti" that spins, stretches, and tangles. The model proposes a single, intuitive mechanism to explain fourteen long-standing puzzles in quantum mechanics, including wave-particle duality, wavefunction collapse, spin, the double-slit experiment, the Pauli exclusion principle, and the delayed-choice experiment. Important note: This is a conceptual framework under active development. The rigorous mathematical formulation and quantitative experimental predictions are not yet complete. The purpose of this preprint is to share the core ideas openly, establish priority, and invite collaboration from mathematicians and theoretical physicists interested in developing the formalism. Keywords: electron model, wave-particle duality, spacetime filament, rotating filament, quantum foundations, double-slit experiment, threshold black hole, conceptual model, spacetime torsion, Pauli exclusion principle, delayed-choice experiment, spin, g-factor
Abstract This paper resolves the wave-particle duality and the measurement problem of the double-slit experiment by applying the Cartesian Relativity Framework [1, 2]. We posit that quantum superposition exists strictly as an unrendered probability distribution within the "Backend" of spacetime—a domain devoid of geometric volume and physical time. The physical detection of a particle is a forced "Render Event" onto a discrete, integer-based coordinate topology. By defining the wave function as a continuous Gaussian probability curve mapping to a quantized physical lattice—governed by a fundamental "Resolution Limit" that removes the reliance on mathematical infinity—we provide a deterministic mechanism for Quantum Dithering, Probabilistic Pruning, and the energetic "Lattice Tax" required to maintain non-rendered states. We address potential critiques regarding non-local domains and the energy costs of entanglement, demonstrating how this framework provides superior macro-to-micro coherence over standard interpretations. Finally, we propose falsifiable observational metrics: the laboratory Jitter Shadow, Render Exclusion Zones, and the measurable energetic overhead of logical address synchronization. Footnotes / References: [1] Kerr, A. J. (2026). Cartesian Relativity and the Zeno Non-singularity: A Unified Theory of Quantum Rendered Spacetime and Elastic Coordinate Topology. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20046745 [2] Kerr, A. J. (2026). Cartesian Spacetime and Macroscopic Gravity: Topological Gradients, Data Collisions, and Planetary Hydrostatic Equilibrium. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20078172
A mathematical model for the slit experiments in the heart of quantum mechanics is developed to gain insight into quantum ‎theory. The proposed system-theoretical model is entirely based on commutative mathematics, i.e. convolution, and integral ‎transformations, and starts with spacetime functions with inherent energy-based cause and effect relations of the state-‎function Ѱ in the complex Hilbert space. The benefits of his approach are as 1-Invariance in time reversal. 2-Deterministic ‎result functions in the model in line with the outcome of slit experiments. 3- Separation of causality and cross-correlations of ‎attained states. 4- Disappearance of a posteriori probability of quantum states. 5- Quantum a priori fixed states after ‎causality interactions have ended, (even) when quanta are (light-years) separated. The model predicts the patterns in the ‎experiments with mathematical functions of the energy distributions. The quantum mechanical counterpart description of the ‎physical reality of slit experiments thus may be considered complete in A. Einstein’s definition. The patterns in double slit ‎experiments are found to be an effect of energy (amplitude-) modulation. An equivalent double-slit pattern can be retrieved ‎from an input modulated 1-slit experiment excluding interference interpretations. The system-theoretical model uses generic ‎properties of quanta and evolves into determinism in ‎quantum mechanics slit experiments. The mathematics in the model ‎handles beables by treatment ‎of momentum p in system theoretical I/O relations of the transformed functions and allows the ‎proposed description by the avoidance of a direct addressing of the individual quanta through variables. The following ‎method yields exact, non-probabilistic results.‎