Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Toward a fundamental mechanics. III

T. E. Phipps

Published Jun 1, 1976• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00708801

Related papers

III. Atomic Theory and Mechanics [2]

Niels Bohr•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations

Comments on Generalized Mechanics

J.G. Krüger, Dirk K. Callebaut

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1968•13 citations

OFN III: Quantum Superpositions of Reading Paths in the Ontological Fundamental Network

Oleg I Evdokimov

The Ontological Fundamental Network framework (Articles I, II) offers a unique opportunity:quantum mechanics could emerge from the pre-geometric structure itself, rather than being imposedon it.

•Jan 31, 2026•0 citations

Some mathematical aspects of the new mechanics

Tullio Levi-Cività

Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 1933•4 citations

The role of quantum measurements in physical processes and protocols

Benjamin Cruikshank, Kurt Jacobs

Abstract In this mainly pedagogical article, we discuss under what circumstances measurements play a special role in quantum processes. In particular, we discuss the following facts that appear to be a common area of confusion. (i) From a fundamental point of view, measurements play no special role whatsoever: all dynamics that can be generated by measurements can be generated by unitary processes (for which post-selection is no exception). (ii) From a purely physical point of view, measurements are not ‘outside’ of quantum mechanics. (iii) The only difference between the abilities of measurement-based protocols and unitary circuits for quantum computing comes from practical (technology dependent) constraints. We emphasise the importance of distinguishing between differences that are (i) fundamental but without physical import; (ii) fundamental and possess physical import; and (iii) are not fundamental but have practical import. We also emphasise the importance of separating theoretical and experimental elements of measurement, primarily projection and amplification , which are physically very different. Note that since we are concerned with facts regarding physical processes, this article has little if anything to do with interpretations of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1707.04241•Quantum Science and Technology•Jul 7, 2017•5 citations

Looking Beyond Classical Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 1, 2008•0 citations
Abstract In this mainly pedagogical article, we discuss under what circumstances measurements play a special role in quantum processes. In particular, we discuss the following facts that appear to be a common area of confusion. (i) From a fundamental point of view, measurements play no special role whatsoever: all dynamics that can be generated by measurements can be generated by unitary processes (for which post-selection is no exception). (ii) From a purely physical point of view, measurements are not ‘outside’ of quantum mechanics. (iii) The only difference between the abilities of measurement-based protocols and unitary circuits for quantum computing comes from practical (technology dependent) constraints. We emphasise the importance of distinguishing between differences that are (i) fundamental but without physical import; (ii) fundamental and possess physical import; and (iii) are not fundamental but have practical import. We also emphasise the importance of separating theoretical and experimental elements of measurement, primarily projection and amplification , which are physically very different. Note that since we are concerned with facts regarding physical processes, this article has little if anything to do with interpretations of quantum mechanics.