Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

OFN III: Quantum Superpositions of Reading Paths in the Ontological Fundamental Network

Oleg I Evdokimov

Published Jan 31, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Ontological Fundamental Network framework (Articles I, II) offers a unique opportunity:quantum mechanics could emerge from the pre-geometric structure itself, rather than being imposedon it.
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18441663

Related papers

SAE QM Paper 10 The Continuum Limit and the Path Integral- The Emergence of Classical Mechanics / 连续极限与路径积分——经典力学之浮现

Han Qin

Full bilingual text and framework available at self-as-an-end.net This paper concludes the SAE (Self-as-an-End) quantum-mechanics series. It does two things: it synthesizes into a single unified picture the ontology established across the nine preceding papers, and it settles the three matters left open by Movement III — the ontological status of the continuum limit, the ontological reading of the path integral, and the emergence of classical mechanics. As a concluding paper it offers no new prediction; its value lies precisely in the ontological synthesis. The picture is spined on one distinction: ρ-OR (pre-closure multi-occupancy) and ρ-AND (closure into single content). Movement I (P1–P5) treats the ontology, carrier, and phenomena of the pre-closure ρ-OR realm; Movement II (P6–P7) treats the closure event of ρ-OR→ρ-AND singularization; Movement III (P8–P10) treats the macroscopic and continuum emergence that follows closure. Every item of the standard quantum-mechanical furniture — the wavefunction, the complex amplitude, ℏ, Schrödinger evolution, tunneling, entanglement, the Born rule, measurement, decoherence, quantum field theory, the path integral, the classical limit — takes its place within this picture as a formal shadow of the ρ-OR/ρ-AND ontology. The path integral is read as a literal transcription, at the effective layer, of the ρ-OR realm (not an ontological identity, nor a derivation from SAE); the stationary-phase ridge is a closure-readable effective-layer face, not the settling of measurement; and Type-A (direct-empirical) novelty is shown to be structurally zero, the framework's contribution being a class of Occam-style ontological adjudication. 本文为 SAE(Self-as-an-End)量子力学系列之收束篇。其工作有二:一是把全系列九篇所立之本体一以贯之地综述为一张统一之图,二是收束乐章 III 所余之三事——连续极限之本体地位、路径积分之本体读法、经典力学之浮现。 作为收束篇,本文不提新预测,其价值正在本体之整合。统一之图以一条分判为脊:ρ-OR(前闭合多容)与 ρ-AND(闭合单内容)。乐章 I(P1–P5)述前闭合 ρ-OR realm 之本体、载体与现象;乐章 II(P6–P7)述 ρ-OR→ρ-AND 单一化之闭合事件;乐章 III(P8–P10)述闭合之后宏观与连续之涌现。标准量子力学之每一件家具——波函数、复振幅、ℏ、薛定谔演化、隧穿、纠缠、玻恩规则、测量、退相干、量子场论、路径积分、经典极限——皆于此图中各安其位,作 ρ-OR/ρ-AND 本体之形式化阴影。路径积分作 ρ-OR realm 在有效层之字面转写(非本体同一、非从 SAE 推导);驻相脊作 closure-readable 之有效层之脸,非测量之落定;甲型(直接经验型)之新意经证为结构性为零,本框架之贡献在一类奥卡姆式之本体论裁决。

•Jun 29, 2026•0 citations

2. The Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Michael Epperson

Fordham University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2020•3 citations

Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory

Guillermo C. Barraza

This article is the second part of a three-paper sequence developing Ontological Field Theory (OFT) as a unified framework grounding quantum mechanics in foundational ontological principles. The trilogy is structured as follows: Part I — Conceptual Necessity:Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics establishes that quantum mechanics follows necessarily from minimal requirements on coherent being, independently of specific physical postulates. Part II — Technical Realization:Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory provides the explicit field-theoretic derivation showing how the Schrödinger equation emerges as the non-relativistic limit of a covariant ontological field. Part III — Critical Context:Why Classical Physics Is an Approximation: Decoherence, Coarse-Graining, and the Limits of Determinism explains why classical determinism and trajectories arise only as emergent, approximate descriptions of fundamentally quantum and relational dynamics. Each article is logically self-contained, but the full argument is distributed across the three contributions. The conceptual analysis motivates the mathematics; the mathematics grounds the physics; and the critical examination situates classical intuition as a limiting case rather than a foundation. The papers are intended to be read as a coherent whole. We argue that quantum mechanics is not an arbitrary empirical framework but an inevitable consequence of minimal ontological requirements. Assuming only that being must exist necessarily, remain consistent, be relational, and admit self-reference, we show that classical deterministic physics is structurally insufficient. Quantum dynamics emerges as the unique low-energy realization of coherent ontological continuity. This work complements explicit field-theoretic derivations by clarifying why quantum mechanics could not have been otherwise.

•Dec 25, 2025•0 citations

A First Approach to the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 31, 2022•0 citations

Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics

Guillermo C. Barraza

This article is the first part of a three-part series developing Ontological Field Theory (OFT), a unified framework grounding quantum mechanics in foundational ontological principles. The trilogy is structured as follows: Part I — Conceptual Necessity:Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics establishes that quantum mechanics follows necessarily from minimal requirements on coherent being, independently of specific physical postulates. Part II — Technical Realization:Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory provides the explicit field-theoretic derivation showing how the Schrödinger equation emerges as the non-relativistic limit of a covariant ontological field. Part III — Critical Context:Why Classical Physics Is an Approximation: Decoherence, Coarse-Graining, and the Limits of Determinism explains why classical determinism and trajectories arise only as emergent, approximate descriptions of fundamentally quantum and relational dynamics. Each article is logically self-contained, but the full argument is distributed across the three contributions. The conceptual analysis motivates the mathematics; the mathematics grounds the physics; and the critical examination situates classical intuition as a limiting case rather than a foundation. The papers are intended to be read as a coherent whole. We argue that quantum mechanics is not an arbitrary empirical framework but an inevitable consequence of minimal ontological requirements. Assuming only that being must exist necessarily, remain consistent, be relational, and admit self-reference, we show that classical deterministic physics is structurally insufficient. Quantum dynamics emerges as the unique low-energy realization of coherent ontological continuity. This work complements explicit field-theoretic derivations by clarifying why quantum mechanics could not have been otherwise.

•Dec 24, 2025•0 citations

B. Ontologically Oriented Survey of Quantum Mechanics

De Gruyter eBooks•Dec 31, 2010•0 citations
Full bilingual text and framework available at self-as-an-end.net This paper concludes the SAE (Self-as-an-End) quantum-mechanics series. It does two things: it synthesizes into a single unified picture the ontology established across the nine preceding papers, and it settles the three matters left open by Movement III — the ontological status of the continuum limit, the ontological reading of the path integral, and the emergence of classical mechanics. As a concluding paper it offers no new prediction; its value lies precisely in the ontological synthesis. The picture is spined on one distinction: ρ-OR (pre-closure multi-occupancy) and ρ-AND (closure into single content). Movement I (P1–P5) treats the ontology, carrier, and phenomena of the pre-closure ρ-OR realm; Movement II (P6–P7) treats the closure event of ρ-OR→ρ-AND singularization; Movement III (P8–P10) treats the macroscopic and continuum emergence that follows closure. Every item of the standard quantum-mechanical furniture — the wavefunction, the complex amplitude, ℏ, Schrödinger evolution, tunneling, entanglement, the Born rule, measurement, decoherence, quantum field theory, the path integral, the classical limit — takes its place within this picture as a formal shadow of the ρ-OR/ρ-AND ontology. The path integral is read as a literal transcription, at the effective layer, of the ρ-OR realm (not an ontological identity, nor a derivation from SAE); the stationary-phase ridge is a closure-readable effective-layer face, not the settling of measurement; and Type-A (direct-empirical) novelty is shown to be structurally zero, the framework's contribution being a class of Occam-style ontological adjudication. 本文为 SAE(Self-as-an-End)量子力学系列之收束篇。其工作有二:一是把全系列九篇所立之本体一以贯之地综述为一张统一之图,二是收束乐章 III 所余之三事——连续极限之本体地位、路径积分之本体读法、经典力学之浮现。 作为收束篇,本文不提新预测,其价值正在本体之整合。统一之图以一条分判为脊:ρ-OR(前闭合多容)与 ρ-AND(闭合单内容)。乐章 I(P1–P5)述前闭合 ρ-OR realm 之本体、载体与现象;乐章 II(P6–P7)述 ρ-OR→ρ-AND 单一化之闭合事件;乐章 III(P8–P10)述闭合之后宏观与连续之涌现。标准量子力学之每一件家具——波函数、复振幅、ℏ、薛定谔演化、隧穿、纠缠、玻恩规则、测量、退相干、量子场论、路径积分、经典极限——皆于此图中各安其位,作 ρ-OR/ρ-AND 本体之形式化阴影。路径积分作 ρ-OR realm 在有效层之字面转写(非本体同一、非从 SAE 推导);驻相脊作 closure-readable 之有效层之脸,非测量之落定;甲型(直接经验型)之新意经证为结构性为零,本框架之贡献在一类奥卡姆式之本体论裁决。
This article is the second part of a three-paper sequence developing Ontological Field Theory (OFT) as a unified framework grounding quantum mechanics in foundational ontological principles. The trilogy is structured as follows: Part I — Conceptual Necessity:Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics establishes that quantum mechanics follows necessarily from minimal requirements on coherent being, independently of specific physical postulates. Part II — Technical Realization:Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory provides the explicit field-theoretic derivation showing how the Schrödinger equation emerges as the non-relativistic limit of a covariant ontological field. Part III — Critical Context:Why Classical Physics Is an Approximation: Decoherence, Coarse-Graining, and the Limits of Determinism explains why classical determinism and trajectories arise only as emergent, approximate descriptions of fundamentally quantum and relational dynamics. Each article is logically self-contained, but the full argument is distributed across the three contributions. The conceptual analysis motivates the mathematics; the mathematics grounds the physics; and the critical examination situates classical intuition as a limiting case rather than a foundation. The papers are intended to be read as a coherent whole. We argue that quantum mechanics is not an arbitrary empirical framework but an inevitable consequence of minimal ontological requirements. Assuming only that being must exist necessarily, remain consistent, be relational, and admit self-reference, we show that classical deterministic physics is structurally insufficient. Quantum dynamics emerges as the unique low-energy realization of coherent ontological continuity. This work complements explicit field-theoretic derivations by clarifying why quantum mechanics could not have been otherwise.
This article is the first part of a three-part series developing Ontological Field Theory (OFT), a unified framework grounding quantum mechanics in foundational ontological principles. The trilogy is structured as follows: Part I — Conceptual Necessity:Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics establishes that quantum mechanics follows necessarily from minimal requirements on coherent being, independently of specific physical postulates. Part II — Technical Realization:Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory provides the explicit field-theoretic derivation showing how the Schrödinger equation emerges as the non-relativistic limit of a covariant ontological field. Part III — Critical Context:Why Classical Physics Is an Approximation: Decoherence, Coarse-Graining, and the Limits of Determinism explains why classical determinism and trajectories arise only as emergent, approximate descriptions of fundamentally quantum and relational dynamics. Each article is logically self-contained, but the full argument is distributed across the three contributions. The conceptual analysis motivates the mathematics; the mathematics grounds the physics; and the critical examination situates classical intuition as a limiting case rather than a foundation. The papers are intended to be read as a coherent whole. We argue that quantum mechanics is not an arbitrary empirical framework but an inevitable consequence of minimal ontological requirements. Assuming only that being must exist necessarily, remain consistent, be relational, and admit self-reference, we show that classical deterministic physics is structurally insufficient. Quantum dynamics emerges as the unique low-energy realization of coherent ontological continuity. This work complements explicit field-theoretic derivations by clarifying why quantum mechanics could not have been otherwise.