Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics

Bose-Einstein condensation of a coupled two-component Bose gas

Hua Shi, Hadi Rastegar, Adam Griffin

Published Feb 1, 1995• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In experiments on excitons and spin-polarized atomic hydrogen, one deals with a gas involving two Bose branches (for example, paraexcitons and orthoexcitons). Based on a simple model for the coupling between these two components, we discuss how interconversion processes affect Bose condensation in such a system. Our analysis is based on an exact transformation to renormalized Bose particles which are uncoupled. We give results for the condensate fraction as a function of the temperature in the case when the two original Bose particles (a and b) are not in chemical equilibrium (i.e., the chemical potentials ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{a}}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{b}}$ are not equal) as well as in the case of chemical equilibrium (${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{a}}$=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{b}}$). Our results are of interest in connection with current attempts to observe Bose condensation in atomiclike gases.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.51.1075

Related papers

Interacting multicomponent exciton gases in a potential trap: Phase separation and Bose-Einstein condensation

S. Sobkowiak, D. Semkat, H. Stolz +2 more

The system under consideration is a multicomponent gas of interacting paraexcitons and orthoexcitons confined in a three-dimensional potential trap. We calculate the spatially resolved optical emission spectrum due to interband transitions involving weak direct and phonon-mediated exciton-photon interactions. For each component, the occurrence of a Bose-Einstein condensate changes the spectrum in a characteristic way so that it directly reflects the constant chemical potential of the excitons and the renormalization of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum. Moreover, the interaction between the components leads, in dependence on temperature and particle number, to modifications of the spectra indicating phase separation of the subsystems. Typical examples of density profiles and luminescence spectra of ground-state paraexcitons and orthoexcitons in ${\text{Cu}}_{2}\text{O}$ are given.

arXiv:1005.0458•Physical Review B•Aug 5, 2010•11 citations

Evidence for Bose-Einstein condensation of a two-component exciton gas

David W. Snoke, James P. Wolfe, A. Mysyrowicz

Time-resolved spectral and spatial measurements of photoluminescence in ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{2}$O at low temperatures suggest that the gas of paraexcitons undergoes Bose-Einstein condensation at high densities. As a result of the two-component nature of the gas (orthoexcitons and paraexcitons with different ground-state energies and spin multiplicities) and the nonequilibrium nature of photoproduced excitons, the condensation process is quite different from the simple ideal-gas case envisioned by Einstein.

Physical Review Letters•May 21, 1990•110 citations

Effects of Interactions on Bose-Einstein Condensation

Robert P. Smith

Bose-Einstein condensation is a unique phase transition in that it is not driven by interparticle interactions, but can theoretically occur in an ideal gas, purely as a consequence of quantum statistics. This chapter addresses the question, ‘ How is this ideal Bose gas condensation modified in the presence of interactions between the particles?’ This seemingly simple question turns out to be surprisingly difficult to answer. Here we outline the theoretical background to this question and discuss some recent measurements on ultracold atomic Bose gases that have sought to provide some answers. Introduction Unlike the vast majority of phase transitions, Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) is not driven by interparticle interactions but can theoretically occur in an ideal (noninteracting) gas, purely as a consequence of quantum statistics. However, in reality, interactions are needed for a Bose gas to remain close to thermal equilibrium. It is thus interesting to discuss if something close to ideal gas BEC can be observed in a real system and what happens in the vicinity of the BEC transition in the presence of interparticle interactions. These simple questions have not been easy to answer, either theoretically or experimentally. The theoretical foundations for studying the effect of interactions on Bose condensed systems were laid over half a century ago by Bogoliubov [1], Penrose and Onsager [2], and Belieav [3], among others. These works initially focused on zerotemperature properties and were extended to nonzero temperature in the pioneering papers of Lee, Huang, and Yang [4, 5, 6, 7]. At that time, the main experimental system was liquid He-4 in which the inter-particle interactions are strong, making connections with theory difficult. The realisation in 1995 of BEC in weakly interacting ultracold atomic gases [8, 9] thus opened up the possibility to experimentally revisit some of these long-discussed questions. This was further aided by, among other advances, the use of Feshbach resonances to tune the interaction strength in atomic gases [10, 11]. Thus, in the last twenty years the study of ultracold Bose gases has been very successful (see Chapter 3 for an insightful account of selected topics and surprising developments over this exciting period). However, the fact that, until recently, ultracold atoms were confined using harmonic potentials has hindered the study of the BEC transition itself.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 4, 2018•3 citations

The Perfect Bose Gas: Bose-Einstein Condensation

Jeffrey Olafsen

This chapter focuses on integrating the distribution function over all the states of conserved Bosons to obtain a relation between particle density and the chemical potential. It describes the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation in a perfect boson gas. The chapter discusses the experimental observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in perfect gases. There are two routes to obtaining Bose-Einstein condensation in a perfect gas. One is to reduce the mass of the particle, thus reducing critical density to a low value at a reasonable temperature. The other route is to lower the temperature to the point where the critical density is so low that the particles are too far apart to interact with each other.

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 26, 2019•0 citations

Bose–Einstein condensation

P. van der Straten, Harold J. Metcalf

Introduction Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) is one of the most intriguing phenomena in physics. The basic idea goes back to the 1920s, when Einstein made predictions for the behavior of atoms at sufficiently low temperatures and high densities. However, it took seven decades for experimental physicists to realize this phase under the low-density conditions envisioned by Einstein. In the intermediate period there were many experiments in which aspects of BEC played important roles. Therefore, phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity were connected to BEC long before its 1995 realization in ultra-cold, low-density atomic vapors. Since BEC can be discussed with very many different backgrounds and applications in mind, the subject can sometimes be overwhelming for interested students. There is a very good reason why a chapter on BEC does not belong in this book. In all the other chapters here, the processes described involve one or at most two atoms, and the interactions that play a role are between the particles that constitute the atom, namely between the nucleus (or nuclei) and their electrons. The interactions are described quantum mechanically by their Hamiltonian that can always be written exactly in non-relativistic terms, and in some cases can even be solved exactly. This makes atoms and molecules a branch of physics where comparisons between theory and experiments become very meaningful since theoretical predictions are often confirmed to very high accuracy. In BEC, it is the interactions among many atoms that are the key for understanding the phenomenon. Although in principle one could write a Hamiltonian for a Bose condensed gas, its large number of particles makes this not very practical. The starting point for the description of a BEC is in the area of many-body physics that belongs to the expertise of condensed-matter physicists. The interactions between ~10 23 electrons in a solid state with a lattice formed by ~10 23 ions resemble the kind of interactions in a BEC much more closely than the simple fewbody interactions in an atom or molecule. Thus all the theoretical models that have been described up to now are not applicable for the contents of this chapter.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2015•8 citations

Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Properties of Dilute Bose Gases

Oldenburg, Jakob Felix

Quantum systems consisting of many particles are both interesting from the physics and the mathematics perspective. One aspect that makes them fascinating from the physics point of view is that they can exhibit quantum effects on macroscopic scales such as Bose-Einstein condensation. This phenomenon, first predicted 100 years ago by Bose [19] and Einstein [44], occurs when a dilute gas of bosons is cooled down to very low temperatures. Below a certain critical temperature a condensate forms, meaning that a macroscopic fraction of the particles is in the same one-particle state, and thus, quantum phenomena become relevant on length scales much larger than the individual atom. The occurrence of Bose-Einstein condensation is also related to superfluidity as suggested in [88]. Bose-Einstein condensation has been achieved experimentally independently by the groups of Cornell and Wieman [3] and Ketterle [40] earning them a Nobel prize in 2001. While Bose and Einstein analyzed theoretically the non-interacting gas, an effective theory describing weakly interacting Bose gases was proposed by Bogoliubov in 1947 with the goal of explaining the occurrence of superfluidity in liquid helium [18]. Using assumptions such as that condensation indeed occurs, his theory yields predictions for the low-energy states of the system. Seen from the mathematics perspective, describing the Bose gas is an interesting challenge due to the strong correlations between particles introduced by the interaction making this case much harder to study than the non-interacting one. In particular, a proof that Bose-Einstein condensation occurs in the thermodynamic limit for continuous systems is still out of reach. However, there has been a lot of work regarding the rigorous analysis of bosonic systems in various relevant regimes. This thesis contains three new contributions establishing rigorous results on bosonic systems in different, physically relevant settings. It is based on the articles [37, 27, 31]. The first result concerns the time-evolution of initially trapped Bose gases in the ultra-dilute Gross-Pitaevskii regime. Under some assumptions on the initial data satisfied in particular by a class of states that are expected to approximate the ground state in a trap, we derive a quasi-free approximation that is close to the true solution in $L^2$-norm. In particular, we show that this approximate wave function is described in terms of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a one-particle state following the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation together with pair excitations with respect to this condensate. As a corollary, we establish a central limit theorem for bounded one-particle observables. The second result is a simple proof of Bose-Einstein condensation for interacting, ultra-dilute gases. More specifically, we consider scalings interpolating between the Gross-Pitaevskii regime and the thermodynamic limit. While condensation had been shown to hold in these regimes before, the advantage of the method used here is its simplicity. Lastly, the third result establishes an upper bound on the ground state energy of a dilute Bose gas in the thermodynamic limit. It captures rigorously the third order correction to the energy per unit volume for sufficiently low densities as predicted in the physics literature first by Wu and subsequently others. $\textit{Full-text embargoed until: 2026-01-01}$

•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations
In experiments on excitons and spin-polarized atomic hydrogen, one deals with a gas involving two Bose branches (for example, paraexcitons and orthoexcitons). Based on a simple model for the coupling between these two components, we discuss how interconversion processes affect Bose condensation in such a system. Our analysis is based on an exact transformation to renormalized Bose particles which are uncoupled. We give results for the condensate fraction as a function of the temperature in the case when the two original Bose particles (a and b) are not in chemical equilibrium (i.e., the chemical potentials \ensuremathμa{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{a}}\ensuremathμa​ and \ensuremathμb{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{b}}\ensuremathμb​ are not equal) as well as in the case of chemical equilibrium (\ensuremathμa{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{a}}\ensuremathμa​=\ensuremathμb{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{b}}\ensuremathμb​). Our results are of interest in connection with current attempts to observe Bose condensation in atomiclike gases.
The system under consideration is a multicomponent gas of interacting paraexcitons and orthoexcitons confined in a three-dimensional potential trap. We calculate the spatially resolved optical emission spectrum due to interband transitions involving weak direct and phonon-mediated exciton-photon interactions. For each component, the occurrence of a Bose-Einstein condensate changes the spectrum in a characteristic way so that it directly reflects the constant chemical potential of the excitons and the renormalization of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum. Moreover, the interaction between the components leads, in dependence on temperature and particle number, to modifications of the spectra indicating phase separation of the subsystems. Typical examples of density profiles and luminescence spectra of ground-state paraexcitons and orthoexcitons in Cu2O{\text{Cu}}_{2}\text{O}Cu2​O are given.
Time-resolved spectral and spatial measurements of photoluminescence in Cu2{\mathrm{Cu}}_{2}Cu2​O at low temperatures suggest that the gas of paraexcitons undergoes Bose-Einstein condensation at high densities. As a result of the two-component nature of the gas (orthoexcitons and paraexcitons with different ground-state energies and spin multiplicities) and the nonequilibrium nature of photoproduced excitons, the condensation process is quite different from the simple ideal-gas case envisioned by Einstein.
Bose-Einstein condensation is a unique phase transition in that it is not driven by interparticle interactions, but can theoretically occur in an ideal gas, purely as a consequence of quantum statistics. This chapter addresses the question, ‘ How is this ideal Bose gas condensation modified in the presence of interactions between the particles?’ This seemingly simple question turns out to be surprisingly difficult to answer. Here we outline the theoretical background to this question and discuss some recent measurements on ultracold atomic Bose gases that have sought to provide some answers. Introduction Unlike the vast majority of phase transitions, Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) is not driven by interparticle interactions but can theoretically occur in an ideal (noninteracting) gas, purely as a consequence of quantum statistics. However, in reality, interactions are needed for a Bose gas to remain close to thermal equilibrium. It is thus interesting to discuss if something close to ideal gas BEC can be observed in a real system and what happens in the vicinity of the BEC transition in the presence of interparticle interactions. These simple questions have not been easy to answer, either theoretically or experimentally. The theoretical foundations for studying the effect of interactions on Bose condensed systems were laid over half a century ago by Bogoliubov [1], Penrose and Onsager [2], and Belieav [3], among others. These works initially focused on zerotemperature properties and were extended to nonzero temperature in the pioneering papers of Lee, Huang, and Yang [4, 5, 6, 7]. At that time, the main experimental system was liquid He-4 in which the inter-particle interactions are strong, making connections with theory difficult. The realisation in 1995 of BEC in weakly interacting ultracold atomic gases [8, 9] thus opened up the possibility to experimentally revisit some of these long-discussed questions. This was further aided by, among other advances, the use of Feshbach resonances to tune the interaction strength in atomic gases [10, 11]. Thus, in the last twenty years the study of ultracold Bose gases has been very successful (see Chapter 3 for an insightful account of selected topics and surprising developments over this exciting period). However, the fact that, until recently, ultracold atoms were confined using harmonic potentials has hindered the study of the BEC transition itself.
This chapter focuses on integrating the distribution function over all the states of conserved Bosons to obtain a relation between particle density and the chemical potential. It describes the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation in a perfect boson gas. The chapter discusses the experimental observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in perfect gases. There are two routes to obtaining Bose-Einstein condensation in a perfect gas. One is to reduce the mass of the particle, thus reducing critical density to a low value at a reasonable temperature. The other route is to lower the temperature to the point where the critical density is so low that the particles are too far apart to interact with each other.
Introduction Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) is one of the most intriguing phenomena in physics. The basic idea goes back to the 1920s, when Einstein made predictions for the behavior of atoms at sufficiently low temperatures and high densities. However, it took seven decades for experimental physicists to realize this phase under the low-density conditions envisioned by Einstein. In the intermediate period there were many experiments in which aspects of BEC played important roles. Therefore, phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity were connected to BEC long before its 1995 realization in ultra-cold, low-density atomic vapors. Since BEC can be discussed with very many different backgrounds and applications in mind, the subject can sometimes be overwhelming for interested students. There is a very good reason why a chapter on BEC does not belong in this book. In all the other chapters here, the processes described involve one or at most two atoms, and the interactions that play a role are between the particles that constitute the atom, namely between the nucleus (or nuclei) and their electrons. The interactions are described quantum mechanically by their Hamiltonian that can always be written exactly in non-relativistic terms, and in some cases can even be solved exactly. This makes atoms and molecules a branch of physics where comparisons between theory and experiments become very meaningful since theoretical predictions are often confirmed to very high accuracy. In BEC, it is the interactions among many atoms that are the key for understanding the phenomenon. Although in principle one could write a Hamiltonian for a Bose condensed gas, its large number of particles makes this not very practical. The starting point for the description of a BEC is in the area of many-body physics that belongs to the expertise of condensed-matter physicists. The interactions between ~10 23 electrons in a solid state with a lattice formed by ~10 23 ions resemble the kind of interactions in a BEC much more closely than the simple fewbody interactions in an atom or molecule. Thus all the theoretical models that have been described up to now are not applicable for the contents of this chapter.
Quantum systems consisting of many particles are both interesting from the physics and the mathematics perspective. One aspect that makes them fascinating from the physics point of view is that they can exhibit quantum effects on macroscopic scales such as Bose-Einstein condensation. This phenomenon, first predicted 100 years ago by Bose [19] and Einstein [44], occurs when a dilute gas of bosons is cooled down to very low temperatures. Below a certain critical temperature a condensate forms, meaning that a macroscopic fraction of the particles is in the same one-particle state, and thus, quantum phenomena become relevant on length scales much larger than the individual atom. The occurrence of Bose-Einstein condensation is also related to superfluidity as suggested in [88]. Bose-Einstein condensation has been achieved experimentally independently by the groups of Cornell and Wieman [3] and Ketterle [40] earning them a Nobel prize in 2001. While Bose and Einstein analyzed theoretically the non-interacting gas, an effective theory describing weakly interacting Bose gases was proposed by Bogoliubov in 1947 with the goal of explaining the occurrence of superfluidity in liquid helium [18]. Using assumptions such as that condensation indeed occurs, his theory yields predictions for the low-energy states of the system. Seen from the mathematics perspective, describing the Bose gas is an interesting challenge due to the strong correlations between particles introduced by the interaction making this case much harder to study than the non-interacting one. In particular, a proof that Bose-Einstein condensation occurs in the thermodynamic limit for continuous systems is still out of reach. However, there has been a lot of work regarding the rigorous analysis of bosonic systems in various relevant regimes. This thesis contains three new contributions establishing rigorous results on bosonic systems in different, physically relevant settings. It is based on the articles [37, 27, 31]. The first result concerns the time-evolution of initially trapped Bose gases in the ultra-dilute Gross-Pitaevskii regime. Under some assumptions on the initial data satisfied in particular by a class of states that are expected to approximate the ground state in a trap, we derive a quasi-free approximation that is close to the true solution in L2L^2L2-norm. In particular, we show that this approximate wave function is described in terms of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a one-particle state following the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation together with pair excitations with respect to this condensate. As a corollary, we establish a central limit theorem for bounded one-particle observables. The second result is a simple proof of Bose-Einstein condensation for interacting, ultra-dilute gases. More specifically, we consider scalings interpolating between the Gross-Pitaevskii regime and the thermodynamic limit. While condensation had been shown to hold in these regimes before, the advantage of the method used here is its simplicity. Lastly, the third result establishes an upper bound on the ground state energy of a dilute Bose gas in the thermodynamic limit. It captures rigorously the third order correction to the energy per unit volume for sufficiently low densities as predicted in the physics literature first by Wu and subsequently others. Full-text embargoed until: 2026-01-01\textit{Full-text embargoed until: 2026-01-01}Full-text embargoed until: 2026-01-01