Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Trajectory Based Non-Markovian Dissipative Tunneling

Werner Koch, Frank Großmann, David J. Tannor

Published Dec 3, 2010• 21 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The influence of a dissipative environment on scattering of a particle by a barrier is investigated by using the recently introduced bohmian mechanics with complex action [J. Chem. Phys. 125, 231103 (2006)]. An extension of this complex trajectory based formalism to include the interaction of the tunneling particle with an environment of harmonic oscillators with a continuous spectral density and at a certain finite temperature allows us to calculate transmission probabilities beyond the weak system bath coupling regime. The results display an increasing tunneling probability for energies below the barrier and a decreased transmission above the barrier due to the coupling. Furthermore, we demonstrate that solutions of a markovian master equation fail to do so in general.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.105.230405

Related papers

Non-Markovian Dissipative Quantum Mechanics with Stochastic Trajectories

Werner Koch

All fields of physics - be it nuclear, atomic and molecular, solid state, or optical - offer examples of systems which are strongly influenced by the environment of the actual system under investigation. The scope of what is called "the environment" may vary, i.e., how far from the system of interest an interaction between the two does persist. Typically, however, it is much larger than the open system itself. Hence, a fully quantum mechanical treatment of the combined system without approximations and without limitations of the type of system is currently out of reach. With the single assumption of the environment to consist of an internally thermalized set of infinitely many harmonic oscillators, the seminal work of Stockburger and Grabert [Chem. Phys., 268:249-256, 2001] introduced an open system description that captures the environmental influence by means of a stochastic driving of the reduced system. The resulting stochastic Liouville-von Neumann equation describes the full non-Markovian dynamics without explicit memory but instead accounts for it implicitly through the correlations of the complex-valued noise forces. The present thesis provides a first application of the Stockburger-Grabert stochastic Liouville-von Neumann equation to the computation of the dynamics of anharmonic, continuous open systems. In particular, it is demonstrated that trajectory based propagators allow for the construction of a numerically stable propagation scheme. With this approach it becomes possible to achieve the tremendous increase of the noise sample count necessary to stochastically converge the results when investigating such systems with continuous variables. After a test against available analytic results for the dissipative harmonic oscillator, the approach is subsequently applied to the analysis of two different realistic, physical systems. As a first example, the dynamics of a dissipative molecular oscillator is investigated. Long time propagation - until thermalization is reached - is shown to be possible with the presented approach. The properties of the thermalized density are determined and they are ascertained to be independent of the system's initial state. Furthermore, the dependence on the bath's temperature and coupling strength is analyzed and it is demonstrated how a change of the bath parameters can be used to tune the system from the dissociative to the bound regime. A second investigation is conducted for a dissipative tunneling scenario in which a wave packet impinges on a barrier. The dependence of the transmission probability on the initial state's kinetic energy as well as the bath's temperature and coupling strength is computed. For both systems, a comparison with the high-temperature Markovian quantum Brownian limit is performed. The importance of a full non-Markovian treatment is demonstrated as deviations are shown to exist between the two descriptions both in the low temperature cases where they are expected and in some of the high temperature cases where their appearance might not be anticipated as easily.:1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2 Theory of Open Quantum Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1 Influence Functional Formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 Quantum Brownian Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.3 Stochastic Unraveling of the Influence Functional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.4 Improved Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4.1 Modified Dynamic Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4.2 Guide Trajectory Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.5 Obtaining Properly Correlated Stochastic Samples from Filtered White Noise 24 3 Unified Stochastic Trajectory Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1 Semiclassical Brownian Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.1 Guide Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2 Real Coherent State Center Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.3 Propagation Scheme Including Stochastic Forces . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.2 Stochastic Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.1 Hydrodynamic Formulation of Bohmian Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.2 Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.2.3 Stochastic BOMCA Trajectories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.3 Noise Distribution Preserving Removal of Adverse Samples . . . . . . . . . . 39 4 Dissipative Harmonic Oscillator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.1 Reservoir Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2 Harmonic Oscillator Analytic Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.1 Ohmic Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.2 Drude Regularized Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.3 Sampling Strategies and Analytic Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.4 Limits of the Markovian Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 5 Dissipative Vibrational Dynamics of Diatomics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 5.1 Molecular Morse Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 5.2 Anharmonic Phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 5.3 Transient Non-Markovian Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5.4 Trapping by Dissipation and Thermalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 6 Tunneling with Dissipation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 6.1 Eckart Barrier Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 6.2 Dissipative Tunneling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 6.3 Investigation of Markovianity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 7 Summary and Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Appendix A Conventions for Constants, Reservoir Kernels, and Influence Phases 69 Appendix B Stochastic Calculus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 B.1 Stochastic Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 B.2 Position Verlet Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 B.3 Runge-Kutta Fourth Order Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Appendix CMorse Oscillator Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Appendix DPrerequisites of a Successful Stochastic Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 D.1 Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 D.2 Kernels of the Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 D.2.1 Quadratic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 D.2.2 Quartic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 D.2.3 Strictly Ohmic Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 D.3 Guide Trajectory Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 D.3.1 Quadratic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 D.3.2 Quartic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 D.3.3 Strictly Ohmic Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 D.4 Computation of Matrix Elements and Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . 92 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97

•Sep 9, 2010•1 citation

Trajectory approach to dissipative quantum phase space dynamics: Application to barrier scattering

Keith H. Hughes, Róbert E. Wyatt

The Caldeira-Leggett master equation, expressed in Lindblad form, has been used in the numerical study of the effect of a thermal environment on the dynamics of the scattering of a wave packet from a repulsive Eckart barrier. The dynamics are studied in terms of phase space trajectories associated with the distribution function, W(q,p,t). The equations of motion for the trajectories include quantum terms that introduce nonlocality into the motion, which imply that an ensemble of correlated trajectories needs to be propagated. However, use of the derivative propagation method (DPM) allows each trajectory to be propagated individually. This is achieved by deriving equations of motion for the partial derivatives of W(q,p,t) that appear in the master equation. The effects of dissipation on the trajectories are studied and results are shown for the transmission probability. On short time scales, decoherence is demonstrated by a swelling of trajectories into momentum space. For a nondissipative system, a comparison is made of the DPM with the "exact" transmission probability calculated from a fixed grid calculation.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 20, 2004•18 citations

Quantum tunneling in a dissipative system

Li Hua Yu

Applying a technique developed recently [L. H. Yu and C. P. Sun, Phys. Rev. A 49, 592 (1994); L. H. Yu, Phys. Lett. 202, 167 (1995)] for a harmonic oscillator coupled to a bath of harmonic oscillators, we present an exact solution for the tunneling problem in an Ohmic dissipative system with inverted harmonic potential. The result shows that while the dissipation tends to suppress the tunneling, the Brownian motion tends to enhance the tunneling. Whether the tunneling rate increases or not would then depend on the initial conditions. We give a specific formula to calculate the tunneling probability determined by various parameters and the initial conditions. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1996•25 citations

Schrödinger-Langevin theory for quantum tunneling through a barrier

B. J. McCoy, Ruben G. Carbonell

We have used the Kanai Hamiltonian, for a quantum-mechanical particle experiencing frictional interactions with its environment, to calculate the influence of dissipation in the surroundings on quantum-mechanical tunneling. We find that for the case of a rectangular potential-energy barrier, the dissipation can either increase or decrease the transmission coefficient, depending on the magnitude of the barrier height and width.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1984•5 citations

Non-Markovian quantum trajectories versus master equations: Finite-temperature heat bath

Ting Yu

The interrelationship between the non-Markovian stochastic Schr\"odinger equations and the corresponding non-Markovian master equations is investigated in the finite-temperature regimes. We show that the general finite-temperature non-Markovian trajectories can be used to derive the corresponding non-Markovian master equations. A simple, yet important solvable example is the well-known damped harmonic oscillator model in which a harmonic oscillator is coupled to a finite-temperature reservoir in the rotating-wave approximation. The exact convolutionless master equation for the damped harmonic oscillator is obtained by averaging the quantum trajectories, relying upon no assumption of coupling strength or time scale. The master equation derived in this way automatically preserves the positivity, Hermiticity, and unity.

arXiv:quant-ph/0402086•Physical Review A•Jun 18, 2004•138 citations

Quantum tunneling in multidimensional systems

S.Y. Lee, N. Takigawa

The effects of coupling to a harmonic oscillator on the quantum tunneling of a macroscopic motion are studied through the influence functional formalism of Feynman's path integral method for the general coupling form factor. As an example, we consider the model in which the potential barrier is parabolic and the coupling Hamiltonian is linear in both coordinates of the macroscopic motion and of the intrinsic harmonic oscillator. The results are then compared with the exact solution obtained through the canonical transformation into normal coordinates in the limiting cases when the normal coordinates reduce to the original coordinates. We found that: (1) In the adiabatic case, i.e., when the recurrence time $\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}$ of the oscillator is much shorter than the transmission time through the macroscopic potential barrier, the effect of oscillator coupling can be well represented by an effective potential. The coupling enhances the tunneling probability on the whole. (2) There exists a critical energy, above which the tunneling probability is reduced because of the linear oscillator coupling. In the weak coupling limit and when $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, the critical energy becomes $\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\infty}$, so that the coupling to the oscillator always reduces the tunneling probability.NUCLEAR REACTIONS Quantum tunneling, coupling of macroscopic motion to intrinsic oscillators, semiclassical method, heavy ion fusion.

Physical Review C•Sep 1, 1983•13 citations
The influence of a dissipative environment on scattering of a particle by a barrier is investigated by using the recently introduced bohmian mechanics with complex action [J. Chem. Phys. 125, 231103 (2006)]. An extension of this complex trajectory based formalism to include the interaction of the tunneling particle with an environment of harmonic oscillators with a continuous spectral density and at a certain finite temperature allows us to calculate transmission probabilities beyond the weak system bath coupling regime. The results display an increasing tunneling probability for energies below the barrier and a decreased transmission above the barrier due to the coupling. Furthermore, we demonstrate that solutions of a markovian master equation fail to do so in general.
All fields of physics - be it nuclear, atomic and molecular, solid state, or optical - offer examples of systems which are strongly influenced by the environment of the actual system under investigation. The scope of what is called "the environment" may vary, i.e., how far from the system of interest an interaction between the two does persist. Typically, however, it is much larger than the open system itself. Hence, a fully quantum mechanical treatment of the combined system without approximations and without limitations of the type of system is currently out of reach. With the single assumption of the environment to consist of an internally thermalized set of infinitely many harmonic oscillators, the seminal work of Stockburger and Grabert [Chem. Phys., 268:249-256, 2001] introduced an open system description that captures the environmental influence by means of a stochastic driving of the reduced system. The resulting stochastic Liouville-von Neumann equation describes the full non-Markovian dynamics without explicit memory but instead accounts for it implicitly through the correlations of the complex-valued noise forces. The present thesis provides a first application of the Stockburger-Grabert stochastic Liouville-von Neumann equation to the computation of the dynamics of anharmonic, continuous open systems. In particular, it is demonstrated that trajectory based propagators allow for the construction of a numerically stable propagation scheme. With this approach it becomes possible to achieve the tremendous increase of the noise sample count necessary to stochastically converge the results when investigating such systems with continuous variables. After a test against available analytic results for the dissipative harmonic oscillator, the approach is subsequently applied to the analysis of two different realistic, physical systems. As a first example, the dynamics of a dissipative molecular oscillator is investigated. Long time propagation - until thermalization is reached - is shown to be possible with the presented approach. The properties of the thermalized density are determined and they are ascertained to be independent of the system's initial state. Furthermore, the dependence on the bath's temperature and coupling strength is analyzed and it is demonstrated how a change of the bath parameters can be used to tune the system from the dissociative to the bound regime. A second investigation is conducted for a dissipative tunneling scenario in which a wave packet impinges on a barrier. The dependence of the transmission probability on the initial state's kinetic energy as well as the bath's temperature and coupling strength is computed. For both systems, a comparison with the high-temperature Markovian quantum Brownian limit is performed. The importance of a full non-Markovian treatment is demonstrated as deviations are shown to exist between the two descriptions both in the low temperature cases where they are expected and in some of the high temperature cases where their appearance might not be anticipated as easily.:1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2 Theory of Open Quantum Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1 Influence Functional Formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 Quantum Brownian Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.3 Stochastic Unraveling of the Influence Functional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.4 Improved Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4.1 Modified Dynamic Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4.2 Guide Trajectory Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.5 Obtaining Properly Correlated Stochastic Samples from Filtered White Noise 24 3 Unified Stochastic Trajectory Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1 Semiclassical Brownian Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.1 Guide Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2 Real Coherent State Center Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.3 Propagation Scheme Including Stochastic Forces . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.2 Stochastic Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.1 Hydrodynamic Formulation of Bohmian Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.2 Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.2.3 Stochastic BOMCA Trajectories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.3 Noise Distribution Preserving Removal of Adverse Samples . . . . . . . . . . 39 4 Dissipative Harmonic Oscillator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.1 Reservoir Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2 Harmonic Oscillator Analytic Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.1 Ohmic Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.2 Drude Regularized Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.3 Sampling Strategies and Analytic Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.4 Limits of the Markovian Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 5 Dissipative Vibrational Dynamics of Diatomics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 5.1 Molecular Morse Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 5.2 Anharmonic Phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 5.3 Transient Non-Markovian Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5.4 Trapping by Dissipation and Thermalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 6 Tunneling with Dissipation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 6.1 Eckart Barrier Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 6.2 Dissipative Tunneling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 6.3 Investigation of Markovianity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 7 Summary and Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Appendix A Conventions for Constants, Reservoir Kernels, and Influence Phases 69 Appendix B Stochastic Calculus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 B.1 Stochastic Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 B.2 Position Verlet Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 B.3 Runge-Kutta Fourth Order Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Appendix CMorse Oscillator Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Appendix DPrerequisites of a Successful Stochastic Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 D.1 Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 D.2 Kernels of the Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 D.2.1 Quadratic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 D.2.2 Quartic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 D.2.3 Strictly Ohmic Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 D.3 Guide Trajectory Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 D.3.1 Quadratic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 D.3.2 Quartic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 D.3.3 Strictly Ohmic Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 D.4 Computation of Matrix Elements and Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . 92 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
The Caldeira-Leggett master equation, expressed in Lindblad form, has been used in the numerical study of the effect of a thermal environment on the dynamics of the scattering of a wave packet from a repulsive Eckart barrier. The dynamics are studied in terms of phase space trajectories associated with the distribution function, W(q,p,t). The equations of motion for the trajectories include quantum terms that introduce nonlocality into the motion, which imply that an ensemble of correlated trajectories needs to be propagated. However, use of the derivative propagation method (DPM) allows each trajectory to be propagated individually. This is achieved by deriving equations of motion for the partial derivatives of W(q,p,t) that appear in the master equation. The effects of dissipation on the trajectories are studied and results are shown for the transmission probability. On short time scales, decoherence is demonstrated by a swelling of trajectories into momentum space. For a nondissipative system, a comparison is made of the DPM with the "exact" transmission probability calculated from a fixed grid calculation.
Applying a technique developed recently [L. H. Yu and C. P. Sun, Phys. Rev. A 49, 592 (1994); L. H. Yu, Phys. Lett. 202, 167 (1995)] for a harmonic oscillator coupled to a bath of harmonic oscillators, we present an exact solution for the tunneling problem in an Ohmic dissipative system with inverted harmonic potential. The result shows that while the dissipation tends to suppress the tunneling, the Brownian motion tends to enhance the tunneling. Whether the tunneling rate increases or not would then depend on the initial conditions. We give a specific formula to calculate the tunneling probability determined by various parameters and the initial conditions. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
The interrelationship between the non-Markovian stochastic Schr\"odinger equations and the corresponding non-Markovian master equations is investigated in the finite-temperature regimes. We show that the general finite-temperature non-Markovian trajectories can be used to derive the corresponding non-Markovian master equations. A simple, yet important solvable example is the well-known damped harmonic oscillator model in which a harmonic oscillator is coupled to a finite-temperature reservoir in the rotating-wave approximation. The exact convolutionless master equation for the damped harmonic oscillator is obtained by averaging the quantum trajectories, relying upon no assumption of coupling strength or time scale. The master equation derived in this way automatically preserves the positivity, Hermiticity, and unity.
The effects of coupling to a harmonic oscillator on the quantum tunneling of a macroscopic motion are studied through the influence functional formalism of Feynman's path integral method for the general coupling form factor. As an example, we consider the model in which the potential barrier is parabolic and the coupling Hamiltonian is linear in both coordinates of the macroscopic motion and of the intrinsic harmonic oscillator. The results are then compared with the exact solution obtained through the canonical transformation into normal coordinates in the limiting cases when the normal coordinates reduce to the original coordinates. We found that: (1) In the adiabatic case, i.e., when the recurrence time $\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}$ of the oscillator is much shorter than the transmission time through the macroscopic potential barrier, the effect of oscillator coupling can be well represented by an effective potential. The coupling enhances the tunneling probability on the whole. (2) There exists a critical energy, above which the tunneling probability is reduced because of the linear oscillator coupling. In the weak coupling limit and when $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, the critical energy becomes $\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\infty}$, so that the coupling to the oscillator always reduces the tunneling probability.NUCLEAR REACTIONS Quantum tunneling, coupling of macroscopic motion to intrinsic oscillators, semiclassical method, heavy ion fusion.