Physical Review A

Polarized atomic fluorescence following molecular photodissociation

J. Vigué, Philippe Grangier, Alain Aspect

Published Dec 1, 1984• 7 citations

Abstract

We comment on some experimental and theoretical results of a recent paper by Hemmati, Fairbank, Jr., Boyer, and Collins [Phys. Rev. A 28, 567 (1983)].Received 21 February 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.30.3317©1984 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.30.3317

Related papers

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Applicability of Hamilton’s equations in the quantum soliton problem’ ’’

David W. Brown, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

A response is made to the three assertions of Škrinjar, Kapov,and Stojanović [Phys. Rev. A 37, 639 (1988)].Received 24 February 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.642©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19889 citations

Polarization of atomic fluorescence excited by molecular photodissociation

J. Vigué, Alain Aspect, Philippe Grangier +3 more

Jan 1, 19840 citations

Comment on ‘‘Ionization of Rydberg atoms by a circularly polarized microwave field’’

Michael Nauenberg

Physical Review LettersMay 28, 199036 citations

ON THE POLARIZATION THEORY OF RESONANCE EMISSION AND THE FLUORESCENCE OF ATOMIC AND DIATOMIC MOLECULES

P. P. Feofilov

Oct 21, 19550 citations

Interference in Atomic Fluorescence Excited by Photodissociation of Homonuclear Diatomic Molecules

Gerald J. Diebold

Springer eBooksJan 1, 19840 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Symplectic quantization, inequivalent quantum theories, and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty’ ”

Merced Montesinos, G. F. Torres del Castillo

We refute the remarks made by Latimer, Comment on “Symplectic quantization, inequivalent quantum theories, and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty” [Phys. Rev. A 75, 066101 (2007)].Received 9 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.066102©2007 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJun 22, 20071 citation