Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Symplectic quantization, inequivalent quantum theories, and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty’ ”

Merced Montesinos, G. F. Torres del Castillo

Published Jun 22, 2007• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We refute the remarks made by Latimer, Comment on “Symplectic quantization, inequivalent quantum theories, and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty” [Phys. Rev. A 75, 066101 (2007)].Received 9 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.066102©2007 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physreva.75.066102

Related papers

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Applicability of Hamilton’s equations in the quantum soliton problem’ ’’

David W. Brown, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

A response is made to the three assertions of Škrinjar, Kapov,and Stojanović [Phys. Rev. A 37, 639 (1988)].Received 24 February 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.642©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1988•9 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Consistency, amplitudes, and probabilities in quantum theory’ ”

Ariel Caticha

I reply to Finkelstein’s comment [preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1723 (1999)] and remark on the meanings conveyed by the word “amplitude.”Received 23 December 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1725©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1999•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1999•2 citations

Comment on ‘‘Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories’’

Daniel L. Schauer

A Comment on the Letter by L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 298 (1992).Received 4 February 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.782©1994 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jan 31, 1994•5 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Time-dependent general quantum quadratic Hamiltonian system” ’

Kyu Hwang Yeon, Chung‐In Um, Thomas F. George

In reply to the Comment by Zheng [Phys. Rev. A 68, 052108 (2003)], it is reaffirmed that the propagator and wave function derived originally are correct.Received 26 October 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.066102©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Dec 15, 2006•0 citations

Comment on “Quantum Mechanics in Metric Space: Wave Functions and their Densities”

Emilio Artacho

A Comment on the Letter by I. D’Amico et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 050401 (2011). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 25 February 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.188901© 2011 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 27, 2011•5 citations
We refute the remarks made by Latimer, Comment on “Symplectic quantization, inequivalent quantum theories, and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty” [Phys. Rev. A 75, 066101 (2007)].Received 9 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.066102©2007 American Physical Society