Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics Conference Series

Born's rule for momentum measurement from prequantum field theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Jun 1, 2009• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Recently a new attempt to go beyond quantum mechanics (QM) was done in the form of so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). In this approach QM is considered as incomplete theory – in total accordance with Einstein [1]. PCSFT is (one of possible) completions of QM. Hidden variables are given by classical fields. (It is again in accordance with Einstein.) These prequantum fields fluctuate on time and space scales which are essentially finer than scales of QM, cf. 't Hooft's attempt to go beyond QM [2, 3]. However opposite to Einstein, PCSFT does not assign results of quantum observations directly to hidden variables. Bohr's idea that the whole experimental arrangement should be taken into account is basic for PCSFT-based measurement theory. This theory for measurements of momentum of quantum particles is presented in this paper.

DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/174/1/012035

Related papers

Towards violation of Born’s rule: description of a simple experiment

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Gregg S. Jaeger +2 more

Recently a new model with hidden variables of the wave type was elaborated, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). Roughly speaking PCSFT is a classical signal theory applied to a special class of signals—“quantum systems”. PCSFT reproduces successfully all probabilistic predictions of QM, including correlations for entangled systems. This model peacefully coexists with all known no‐go theorems, including Bell’s theorem. In our approach QM is an approximate model. All probabilistic predictions of QM are only (quite good) approximations of “real physical averages”. The latter are averages with respect to fluctuations of prequantum fields. In particular, Born’s rule is only an approximate rule. More precise experiments should demonstrate its violation. We present a simple experiment which has to produce statistical data violating Born’s rule. Since the PCSFT‐presentation of this experiment may be difficult for experimenters, we reformulate consequences of PCSFT in terms of the conventional wave function. In general, deviation from Born’s rule is rather small. We found an experiment amplifying this deviation. We start with a toy example. Then we present a more realistic example based on Gaussian states with very small dispersion.

arXiv:1007.4677•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Towards violation of Born’s rule: description of a simple experiment

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Recently a new model with hidden variables of the wave type was elaborated, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). Roughly speaking PCSFT is a classical signal theory applied to a special class of signals—“quantum systems”. PCSFT reproduces successfully all probabilistic predictions of QM, including correlations for entangled systems. This model peacefully coexists with all known no‐go theorems, including Bell’s theorem. In our approach QM is an approximate model. All probabilistic predictions of QM are only (quite good) approximations of “real physical averages”. The latter are averages with respect to fluctuations of prequantum fields. In particular, Born’s rule is only an approximate rule. More precise experiments should demonstrate its violation. We present a simple experiment which has to produce statistical data violating Born’s rule. Since the PCSFT‐presentation of this experiment may be difficult for experimenters, we reformulate consequences of PCSFT in terms of the conventional wave function. In general, deviation from Born’s rule is rather small. We found an experiment amplifying this deviation. We start with a toy example. Then we present a more realistic example based on Gaussian states with very small dispersion.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•5 citations

Quantum mechanics as an approximation of classical statistical mechanics

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We show that the probabilistic formalism of QM can be obtained as a special projection of classical statistical mechanics for systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Such systems can be interpreted as classical fields. Thus in our approach QM is a projection of (prequantum) classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This projection is based on the Taylor expansion of classical physical variables – maps f: Ω → R, where Ω is the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. The space of classical statistical states consists of Gaussian measures on Ω having zero mean value and negligibly small dispersion. On one hand, the creation of such a prequantum model strongly supports attempts (first of all by Schrödinger and Einstein) to create purely field model of QM. On the other hand, it gives the possibility to go beyond QM. The main experimental prediction is that averages calculated in the mathematical formalism of QM (von Neumann’s trace formula) are only approximative averages. If predictions of PCSFT are correct then it would be possible to find deviations of experimental averages from quantum ones. 1

•Jun 3, 2005•0 citations

Prequantum classical statistical field theory: background field as a source of everything?

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT) is a new attempt to consider quantum mechanics (QM) as an emergent phenomenon, cf. with De Broglie's "double solution" approach, Bohmian mechanics, stochastic electrodynamics (SED), Nelson's stochastic QM and its generalization by Davidson, 't Hooft's models and their development by Elze. PCSFT is a comeback to a purely wave viewpoint on QM, cf. with early Schrodinger. There is no quantum particles at all, only waves. In particular, photons are simply wave-pulses of the classical electromagnetic field, cf. SED. Moreover, even massive particles are special "prequantum fields": the electron field, the neutron field, and so on. PCSFT claims that (sooner or later) people will be able to measure components of these fields: components of the "photonic field" (the classical electromagnetic field of low intensity), electronic field, neutronic field, and so on. At the moment we are able to produce quantum correlations as correlations of classical Gaussian random fields. In this paper we are interested in mathematical and physical reasons of usage of Gaussian fields. We consider prequantum signals (corresponding to quantum systems) as composed of a huge number of wave-pulses (on very fine prequantum time scale). We speculate that the prequantum background field (the field of "vacuum fluctuations") might play the role of a source of such pulses, i.e., the source of everything.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jul 8, 2011•7 citations

Correlations of Entangled Systems from Fluctuations of the Prequantum Field: the Case of an Arbitrary Density Operator

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT) is a new attempt to consider quantum mechanics (QM) as an emergent phenomenon, cf. with De Broglie’s “double solution” approach, Bohmian mechanics, stochastic electrodynamics (SED), Nelson’s stochastic QM and its generalization by Davidson, ‘t Hooft’s models and their development by Elze. PCSFT is a comeback to a purely wave viewpoint on QM, cf. with early Schrödinger. There is no quantum particles at all, only waves. In particular, photons are simply wave‐pulses of the classical electromagnetic field, cf. SED. Moreover, even massive particles are special “prequantum fields”: the electron field, the neutron field and so on. PCSFT claims that (soon or later) people will be able to measure components of these fields: components of the “photonic field” (the classical electromagnetic field of low intensity), electronic field, neutronic field and so on. However, at the moment (in this paper) we restrict our efforts to reproduce “simply” predictions of QM in the classical field framework. We will show that correlations of entangled systems can be obtained from fluctuations of the prequantum field. We consider the most general case: in QM the state is given by the density operator.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2010•1 citation

Prequantum Classical Statistical Field Theory—PCSFT

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Guillaume Adenier, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov +3 more

In this short note we present (without to go into mathematical details) the main notions of Prequantum Classical Statistical Field Theory (PCSFT): theory of classical fields which fluctuations produce averages approximatively coinciding with averages given by the quantum formalism. Thus the conventional quantum mechanics can be considered as a probabilistic approximation of a more detailed classical field model. Experimental predictions of PCSFT are discussed

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•4 citations
Recently a new attempt to go beyond quantum mechanics (QM) was done in the form of so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). In this approach QM is considered as incomplete theory – in total accordance with Einstein [1]. PCSFT is (one of possible) completions of QM. Hidden variables are given by classical fields. (It is again in accordance with Einstein.) These prequantum fields fluctuate on time and space scales which are essentially finer than scales of QM, cf. 't Hooft's attempt to go beyond QM [2, 3]. However opposite to Einstein, PCSFT does not assign results of quantum observations directly to hidden variables. Bohr's idea that the whole experimental arrangement should be taken into account is basic for PCSFT-based measurement theory. This theory for measurements of momentum of quantum particles is presented in this paper.
Recently a new model with hidden variables of the wave type was elaborated, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). Roughly speaking PCSFT is a classical signal theory applied to a special class of signals—“quantum systems”. PCSFT reproduces successfully all probabilistic predictions of QM, including correlations for entangled systems. This model peacefully coexists with all known no‐go theorems, including Bell’s theorem. In our approach QM is an approximate model. All probabilistic predictions of QM are only (quite good) approximations of “real physical averages”. The latter are averages with respect to fluctuations of prequantum fields. In particular, Born’s rule is only an approximate rule. More precise experiments should demonstrate its violation. We present a simple experiment which has to produce statistical data violating Born’s rule. Since the PCSFT‐presentation of this experiment may be difficult for experimenters, we reformulate consequences of PCSFT in terms of the conventional wave function. In general, deviation from Born’s rule is rather small. We found an experiment amplifying this deviation. We start with a toy example. Then we present a more realistic example based on Gaussian states with very small dispersion.
Recently a new model with hidden variables of the wave type was elaborated, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). Roughly speaking PCSFT is a classical signal theory applied to a special class of signals—“quantum systems”. PCSFT reproduces successfully all probabilistic predictions of QM, including correlations for entangled systems. This model peacefully coexists with all known no‐go theorems, including Bell’s theorem. In our approach QM is an approximate model. All probabilistic predictions of QM are only (quite good) approximations of “real physical averages”. The latter are averages with respect to fluctuations of prequantum fields. In particular, Born’s rule is only an approximate rule. More precise experiments should demonstrate its violation. We present a simple experiment which has to produce statistical data violating Born’s rule. Since the PCSFT‐presentation of this experiment may be difficult for experimenters, we reformulate consequences of PCSFT in terms of the conventional wave function. In general, deviation from Born’s rule is rather small. We found an experiment amplifying this deviation. We start with a toy example. Then we present a more realistic example based on Gaussian states with very small dispersion.
We show that the probabilistic formalism of QM can be obtained as a special projection of classical statistical mechanics for systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Such systems can be interpreted as classical fields. Thus in our approach QM is a projection of (prequantum) classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This projection is based on the Taylor expansion of classical physical variables – maps f: Ω → R, where Ω is the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. The space of classical statistical states consists of Gaussian measures on Ω having zero mean value and negligibly small dispersion. On one hand, the creation of such a prequantum model strongly supports attempts (first of all by Schrödinger and Einstein) to create purely field model of QM. On the other hand, it gives the possibility to go beyond QM. The main experimental prediction is that averages calculated in the mathematical formalism of QM (von Neumann’s trace formula) are only approximative averages. If predictions of PCSFT are correct then it would be possible to find deviations of experimental averages from quantum ones. 1
Prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT) is a new attempt to consider quantum mechanics (QM) as an emergent phenomenon, cf. with De Broglie's "double solution" approach, Bohmian mechanics, stochastic electrodynamics (SED), Nelson's stochastic QM and its generalization by Davidson, 't Hooft's models and their development by Elze. PCSFT is a comeback to a purely wave viewpoint on QM, cf. with early Schrodinger. There is no quantum particles at all, only waves. In particular, photons are simply wave-pulses of the classical electromagnetic field, cf. SED. Moreover, even massive particles are special "prequantum fields": the electron field, the neutron field, and so on. PCSFT claims that (sooner or later) people will be able to measure components of these fields: components of the "photonic field" (the classical electromagnetic field of low intensity), electronic field, neutronic field, and so on. At the moment we are able to produce quantum correlations as correlations of classical Gaussian random fields. In this paper we are interested in mathematical and physical reasons of usage of Gaussian fields. We consider prequantum signals (corresponding to quantum systems) as composed of a huge number of wave-pulses (on very fine prequantum time scale). We speculate that the prequantum background field (the field of "vacuum fluctuations") might play the role of a source of such pulses, i.e., the source of everything.
Prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT) is a new attempt to consider quantum mechanics (QM) as an emergent phenomenon, cf. with De Broglie’s “double solution” approach, Bohmian mechanics, stochastic electrodynamics (SED), Nelson’s stochastic QM and its generalization by Davidson, ‘t Hooft’s models and their development by Elze. PCSFT is a comeback to a purely wave viewpoint on QM, cf. with early Schrödinger. There is no quantum particles at all, only waves. In particular, photons are simply wave‐pulses of the classical electromagnetic field, cf. SED. Moreover, even massive particles are special “prequantum fields”: the electron field, the neutron field and so on. PCSFT claims that (soon or later) people will be able to measure components of these fields: components of the “photonic field” (the classical electromagnetic field of low intensity), electronic field, neutronic field and so on. However, at the moment (in this paper) we restrict our efforts to reproduce “simply” predictions of QM in the classical field framework. We will show that correlations of entangled systems can be obtained from fluctuations of the prequantum field. We consider the most general case: in QM the state is given by the density operator.