Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Consistent interpretation of quantum mechanics using quantum trajectories

Robert B. Griffiths

Published Apr 12, 1993• 130 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The probabilistic element of quantum theory can be combined with the unitary time evolution of Schr\"odinger's equation in a natural and consistent way using the idea of a quantum trajectory, the quantum analog of the trajectory traced out in phase space as a function of time by a point representing the state of a closed classical system. A family of quantum trajectories can be defined using bases for the quantum Hilbert space at different times chosen so that an appropriate noninterference condition, related to the Gell-Mann and Hartle notion of medium decoherence, is satisfied. The result is a generalization of the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.70.2201

Related papers

Comment on Consistent Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Using Quantum Trajectories

Lajos Diósi

Recently, Griffiths presented a generalization of the consistent history approach to quantum mechanics. I can easily construct all possible complete families satisfying Griffiths' "noninterference conditions". Since only trivial families exist one may conclude that Griffiths' proposal has not got farther than the ordinary theory of quantum measurement.

arXiv:gr-qc/9304038•Apr 27, 1993•0 citations

Consistent Quantum Reasoning

Robert B. Griffiths

Precise rules are developed in order to formalize the reasoning processes involved in standard non-relativistic quantum mechanics, with the help of analogies from classical physics. A classical or quantum description of a mechanical system involves a {\it framework}, often chosen implicitly, and a {\it statement} or assertion about the system which is either true or false within the framework with which it is associated. Quantum descriptions are no less ``objective'' than their classical counterparts, but differ from the latter in the following respects: (i) The framework employs a Hilbert space rather than a classical phase space. (ii) The rules for constructing meaningful statements require that the associated projectors commute with each other and, in the case of time-dependent quantum histories, that consistency conditions be satisfied. (iii) There are incompatible frameworks which cannot be combined, either in constructing descriptions or in making logical inferences about them, even though any one of these frameworks may be used separately for describing a particular physical system. A new type of ``generalized history'' is introduced which extends previous proposals by Omnès, and Gell-Mann and Hartle, and a corresponding consistency condition which does not involve density matrices or single out a direction of time. Applications which illustrate the formalism include: measurements of spin, two-slit diffraction, and the emergence of the classical world from a fully quantum description.

arXiv:quant-ph/9505009•May 17, 1995•5 citations

Towards the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics

M R Sarkardei

We introduce and review the consistent (decoherent) histories approach to quantum mechanics due to Griffiths, to Gell-Mann and Hartle, and to Omnes. We will not attempt an in depth look at this approach as it would be impossible to treat it in such a short review. The emphasis is on understanding the broader meaning of the consistency and decoherence. The consistent history approach to quantum mechanics provides a precise conceptual framework for describing how a closed quantum system develops in time. The approach also provides a framework from which we may observe the emergence of an approximately classical domain for macroscopic systems, together with the conventional Copenhagen quantum mechanics for microscopic subsystems. We will study the formalism of decoherence and look at several approaches to decoherence. In examining a system of quantum Brownian motion and using the methods of Feynman and Vernon, we derive an equation of motion for the density matrix, the master equation of the system. This leads us to a brief overview of decoherence. PACS Nos.: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.–w, 03.65.Yz, 04.60.–m, 05.30.–d

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 2004•6 citations

A Review of the Decoherent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanicsa

J. J. Halliwell

I review the decoherent (or consistent) histories approach to quantum mechanics, due to Griffiths, to Gell-Mann and Hartle, and to Omnes. This is an approach to standard quantum theory specifically designed to apply to genuinely closed systems, up to and including the entire universe. It does not depend on an assumed separation of classical and quantum domains, on notions of measurement, or on collapse of the wave function. Its primary aim is to find sets of histories for closed systems exhibiting negligble interference, and therefore, to which probabilities may be assigned. Such sets of histories are called consistent or decoherent, and may be manipulated according to the rules of ordinary (Boolean) logic. The approach provides a framework from which one may predict the emergence of an approximately classical domain for macroscopic systems, together with the conventional Copenhagen quantum mechanics for microscropic subsystems. In the special case in which the total closed system naturally separates into a distinguished subsystem coupled to an environment, the decoherent histories approach is closed related to the quantum state diffusion approach of Gisin and Percival.

arXiv:gr-qc/9407040•Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Apr 1, 1995•109 citations

Consistent Quantum Theory

Robert B. Griffiths

Quantum mechanics is one of the most fundamental yet difficult subjects in physics. Nonrelativistic quantum theory is presented here in a clear and systematic fashion, integrating Born's probabilistic interpretation with Schrödinger dynamics. Basic quantum principles are illustrated with simple examples requiring no mathematics beyond linear algebra and elementary probability theory. The quantum measurement process is consistently analyzed using fundamental quantum principles without referring to measurement. These same principles are used to resolve several of the paradoxes that have long perplexed physicists, including the double slit and Schrödinger's cat. The consistent histories formalism used here was first introduced by the author, and extended by M. Gell-Mann, J. Hartle and R. Omnès. Essential for researchers yet accessible to advanced undergraduate students in physics, chemistry, mathematics, and computer science, this book is supplementary to standard textbooks. It will also be of interest to physicists and philosophers working on the foundations of quantum mechanics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 29, 2001•256 citations

Bohmian Trajectories Within Hilbert Space Based Quantum Mechanics. Solution of the Measurement Problem

Tulsi Dass

de Broglie-Bohm theory (dBBT), treating quantum particles as point objects moving along well defined (Bohmian) trajectories, offers an appealing solution of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics; it has, however, problems relating to spin, relativity and lack of proper integration with the Hilbert space based framework. In this work, we present a consistent formalism which has the traditional state-observable framework integrated with the desirable features of dBBT. We adopt ensemble interpretation for the Schrodinger wave function $ψ$. Given a Schrodinger wave function $ψ$, we use its value $ψ_0$ at some fixed time (say, $t = 0$) to define the probability measure $|ψ_0|^2 {\rm d}x$ on the system configuration space $M$ ($=\mathbb{R}^n$). On the resulting probability space $\mathcal{M}_0$, we introduce a stochastic process $ξ(t)$ corresponding to the Heisenberg position operator $X_H(t)$ such that, in the Heisenberg state $|ψ_h\rangle$ corresponding to $ψ_0$, the expectation value of $X_H(t)$ equals that of $ξ(t)$ in $\mathcal{M}_0$. This condition leads to the de Broglie-Bohm guidance equation for the sample paths of the process $ξ(t)$ which are, therefore, Bohmian trajectories supposedly representing time-evolutions of individual members of the $ψ_0$-ensemble. Stochastic processes and Bohmian trajectories corresponding to observables with discrete eigenvalues (in particular spin) are treated by extending the configuration space to the spectral space of the commutative algebra obtained by adding appropriate discrete observables to the position observables. Pauli's equation is treated as an example. A straightforward derivation of von Neumann's projection rule employing the Schrodinger-Bohm evolution of individual systems along their Bohmian trajectories is given. Some comments on the potential application of the formalism developed here to quantum mechanics of the universe are included.

quant-pharXiv:2512.07007•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations
The probabilistic element of quantum theory can be combined with the unitary time evolution of Schr"odinger's equation in a natural and consistent way using the idea of a quantum trajectory, the quantum analog of the trajectory traced out in phase space as a function of time by a point representing the state of a closed classical system. A family of quantum trajectories can be defined using bases for the quantum Hilbert space at different times chosen so that an appropriate noninterference condition, related to the Gell-Mann and Hartle notion of medium decoherence, is satisfied. The result is a generalization of the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics.
Precise rules are developed in order to formalize the reasoning processes involved in standard non-relativistic quantum mechanics, with the help of analogies from classical physics. A classical or quantum description of a mechanical system involves a {\it framework}, often chosen implicitly, and a {\it statement} or assertion about the system which is either true or false within the framework with which it is associated. Quantum descriptions are no less ``objective'' than their classical counterparts, but differ from the latter in the following respects: (i) The framework employs a Hilbert space rather than a classical phase space. (ii) The rules for constructing meaningful statements require that the associated projectors commute with each other and, in the case of time-dependent quantum histories, that consistency conditions be satisfied. (iii) There are incompatible frameworks which cannot be combined, either in constructing descriptions or in making logical inferences about them, even though any one of these frameworks may be used separately for describing a particular physical system. A new type of ``generalized history'' is introduced which extends previous proposals by Omnès, and Gell-Mann and Hartle, and a corresponding consistency condition which does not involve density matrices or single out a direction of time. Applications which illustrate the formalism include: measurements of spin, two-slit diffraction, and the emergence of the classical world from a fully quantum description.
We introduce and review the consistent (decoherent) histories approach to quantum mechanics due to Griffiths, to Gell-Mann and Hartle, and to Omnes. We will not attempt an in depth look at this approach as it would be impossible to treat it in such a short review. The emphasis is on understanding the broader meaning of the consistency and decoherence. The consistent history approach to quantum mechanics provides a precise conceptual framework for describing how a closed quantum system develops in time. The approach also provides a framework from which we may observe the emergence of an approximately classical domain for macroscopic systems, together with the conventional Copenhagen quantum mechanics for microscopic subsystems. We will study the formalism of decoherence and look at several approaches to decoherence. In examining a system of quantum Brownian motion and using the methods of Feynman and Vernon, we derive an equation of motion for the density matrix, the master equation of the system. This leads us to a brief overview of decoherence. PACS Nos.: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.–w, 03.65.Yz, 04.60.–m, 05.30.–d
I review the decoherent (or consistent) histories approach to quantum mechanics, due to Griffiths, to Gell-Mann and Hartle, and to Omnes. This is an approach to standard quantum theory specifically designed to apply to genuinely closed systems, up to and including the entire universe. It does not depend on an assumed separation of classical and quantum domains, on notions of measurement, or on collapse of the wave function. Its primary aim is to find sets of histories for closed systems exhibiting negligble interference, and therefore, to which probabilities may be assigned. Such sets of histories are called consistent or decoherent, and may be manipulated according to the rules of ordinary (Boolean) logic. The approach provides a framework from which one may predict the emergence of an approximately classical domain for macroscopic systems, together with the conventional Copenhagen quantum mechanics for microscropic subsystems. In the special case in which the total closed system naturally separates into a distinguished subsystem coupled to an environment, the decoherent histories approach is closed related to the quantum state diffusion approach of Gisin and Percival.
Quantum mechanics is one of the most fundamental yet difficult subjects in physics. Nonrelativistic quantum theory is presented here in a clear and systematic fashion, integrating Born's probabilistic interpretation with Schrödinger dynamics. Basic quantum principles are illustrated with simple examples requiring no mathematics beyond linear algebra and elementary probability theory. The quantum measurement process is consistently analyzed using fundamental quantum principles without referring to measurement. These same principles are used to resolve several of the paradoxes that have long perplexed physicists, including the double slit and Schrödinger's cat. The consistent histories formalism used here was first introduced by the author, and extended by M. Gell-Mann, J. Hartle and R. Omnès. Essential for researchers yet accessible to advanced undergraduate students in physics, chemistry, mathematics, and computer science, this book is supplementary to standard textbooks. It will also be of interest to physicists and philosophers working on the foundations of quantum mechanics.
de Broglie-Bohm theory (dBBT), treating quantum particles as point objects moving along well defined (Bohmian) trajectories, offers an appealing solution of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics; it has, however, problems relating to spin, relativity and lack of proper integration with the Hilbert space based framework. In this work, we present a consistent formalism which has the traditional state-observable framework integrated with the desirable features of dBBT. We adopt ensemble interpretation for the Schrodinger wave function ψψψ. Given a Schrodinger wave function ψψψ, we use its value ψ0ψ_0ψ0​ at some fixed time (say, t=0t = 0t=0) to define the probability measure ∣ψ0∣2dx|ψ_0|^2 {\rm d}x∣ψ0​∣2dx on the system configuration space MMM (=Rn=\mathbb{R}^n=Rn). On the resulting probability space M0\mathcal{M}_0M0​, we introduce a stochastic process ξ(t)ξ(t)ξ(t) corresponding to the Heisenberg position operator XH(t)X_H(t)XH​(t) such that, in the Heisenberg state ∣ψh⟩|ψ_h\rangle∣ψh​⟩ corresponding to ψ0ψ_0ψ0​, the expectation value of XH(t)X_H(t)XH​(t) equals that of ξ(t)ξ(t)ξ(t) in M0\mathcal{M}_0M0​. This condition leads to the de Broglie-Bohm guidance equation for the sample paths of the process ξ(t)ξ(t)ξ(t) which are, therefore, Bohmian trajectories supposedly representing time-evolutions of individual members of the ψ0ψ_0ψ0​-ensemble. Stochastic processes and Bohmian trajectories corresponding to observables with discrete eigenvalues (in particular spin) are treated by extending the configuration space to the spectral space of the commutative algebra obtained by adding appropriate discrete observables to the position observables. Pauli's equation is treated as an example. A straightforward derivation of von Neumann's projection rule employing the Schrodinger-Bohm evolution of individual systems along their Bohmian trajectories is given. Some comments on the potential application of the formalism developed here to quantum mechanics of the universe are included.