Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Stokes phase and geometrical phase in a driven two-level system

Yōsuke Kayanuma

Published Apr 1, 1997• 68 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The generic two-level model with time-dependent matrix elements becomes soluble in the limit that its diagonal and off-diagonal terms vary along a flat ellipse, encircling the diabolical singular point in the parameter space. The time evolution of the state vector is explicitly obtained, and the condition for its evolution to form a closed circuit in the projective Hilbert space of rays is given as a result of destructive interference at level crossing. The Aharonov-Anandan geometrical phase is shown to be related to the Stokes phase for the Landau-Zener model, which is a natural extension of Berry's phase to nonadiabatic evolutions.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.55.r2495

Related papers

Nonadiabatic geometric phase in a doubly driven two-level system

Weixin Liu, Tao Wang, Weidong Li

We study theoretically the nonadiabatic geometric phase of a doubly driven two-level system with an additional relative phase between the two driving modes introduced in. It is shown that the time evolution of the system strongly depends on this relative phase. The condition for the system returning to its initial state after a single period is given by the means of the Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana destructive interference. The nonadiabatic geometric phase accompanying a cyclic evolution is shown to be related to the Stokes phase as well as this relative phase. By controlling the relative phase, the geometric phase can characterize two distinct phases in the adiabatic limit.

Chinese Physics B•Aug 16, 2022•2 citations

Geometric phase in open two-level system

Zhisong Wang, L. C. Kwek, C. H Lai +1 more

A mapping is established in connecting density matrices, associated with an evolution of a quantum open system, with vector ray in a complex projective Hilbert space. By using the corresponding vector ray to represent the open two-level system, we may observe the geometric phase for the open two-level system. The geometric phase of the open two-level system depends only on the smooth (open or closed) curve in the complex projective Hilbert space of ray, which is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures on this space.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•May 16, 2006•48 citations

Control of the Geometric Phase and Nonequivalence between Geometric-Phase Definitions in the Adiabatic Limit

Xiaosong Zhu, Peixiang Lu, Manfred Lein

If the time evolution of a quantum state leads back to the initial state, a geometric phase is accumulated that is known as the Berry phase for adiabatic evolution or as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase for nonadiabatic evolution. We evaluate these geometric phases using Floquet theory for systems in time-dependent external fields with a focus on paths leading through a degeneracy of the eigenenergies. Contrary to expectations, the low-frequency limits of the two phases do not always coincide. This happens as the degeneracy leads to a slow convergence of the quantum states to adiabaticity, resulting in a nonzero finite or divergent contribution to the AA phase. Steering the system adiabatically through a degeneracy provides control over the geometric phase as it can cause a π shift of the Berry phase. On the other hand, we revisit an example of degeneracy crossing proposed by AA. We find that, at suitable driving frequencies, both geometric-phase definitions give the same result and the dynamical phase is zero due to the symmetry of time evolution about the point of degeneracy, providing an advantageous setup for manipulation of quantum states.

Physical Review Letters•Jan 20, 2022•23 citations

Geometrical description of Berry's phase

Don Nelson Page

Berry, Simon, and Aharonov and Anandan have discovered, interpreted, and generalized a geometrical phase factor that occurs for a quantum state evolving around a closed path in the projective Hilbert space of rays. Here this phase is directly given in terms of the holonomies of several natural geometrical structures on the projective space.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1987•177 citations

Geometric phase of mixed states for three-level open systems

Yanyan Jiang, Y. H. Ji, Hualan Xu +4 more

Geometric phase of mixed state for three-level open system is defined by establishing in connecting density matrix with nonunit vector ray in a three-dimensional complex Hilbert space. Because the geometric phase depends only on the smooth curve on this space, it is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures. Under the limiting of pure state, our approach is in agreement with the Berry phase, Pantcharatnam phase, and Aharonov and Anandan phase. We find that, furthermore, the Berry phase of mixed state correlated to population inversions of three-level open system.

Physical Review A•Dec 8, 2010•14 citations

Phases of the electronic two-level model under rotating wave approximation

M. T. Thomaz, A.C. Aguiar Pinto, M Moutinho

We present the time evolution of the electronic two-level model in rotating wave approximation and calculate the Aharonov–Anandan phase of the vector states with cyclic evolution either within the period of an external monochromatic electric field or the period corresponding to the generalized Rabi frequency. The Aharonov–Anandan phase in the most general case is shown to be dependent on the initial vector state, unless the system evolves in the adiabatic regime; in the latter case, the Aharonov–Anandan phase recovers Berry's phase. In the quasi-resonant regime of the electronic two-level model, the different relations between Γ and the frequency ω of the electric field correspond to distinct regimes of the coupling between this external field and matter.

Physica Scripta•Jul 12, 2012•2 citations
The generic two-level model with time-dependent matrix elements becomes soluble in the limit that its diagonal and off-diagonal terms vary along a flat ellipse, encircling the diabolical singular point in the parameter space. The time evolution of the state vector is explicitly obtained, and the condition for its evolution to form a closed circuit in the projective Hilbert space of rays is given as a result of destructive interference at level crossing. The Aharonov-Anandan geometrical phase is shown to be related to the Stokes phase for the Landau-Zener model, which is a natural extension of Berry's phase to nonadiabatic evolutions.
We study theoretically the nonadiabatic geometric phase of a doubly driven two-level system with an additional relative phase between the two driving modes introduced in. It is shown that the time evolution of the system strongly depends on this relative phase. The condition for the system returning to its initial state after a single period is given by the means of the Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana destructive interference. The nonadiabatic geometric phase accompanying a cyclic evolution is shown to be related to the Stokes phase as well as this relative phase. By controlling the relative phase, the geometric phase can characterize two distinct phases in the adiabatic limit.
A mapping is established in connecting density matrices, associated with an evolution of a quantum open system, with vector ray in a complex projective Hilbert space. By using the corresponding vector ray to represent the open two-level system, we may observe the geometric phase for the open two-level system. The geometric phase of the open two-level system depends only on the smooth (open or closed) curve in the complex projective Hilbert space of ray, which is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures on this space.
If the time evolution of a quantum state leads back to the initial state, a geometric phase is accumulated that is known as the Berry phase for adiabatic evolution or as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase for nonadiabatic evolution. We evaluate these geometric phases using Floquet theory for systems in time-dependent external fields with a focus on paths leading through a degeneracy of the eigenenergies. Contrary to expectations, the low-frequency limits of the two phases do not always coincide. This happens as the degeneracy leads to a slow convergence of the quantum states to adiabaticity, resulting in a nonzero finite or divergent contribution to the AA phase. Steering the system adiabatically through a degeneracy provides control over the geometric phase as it can cause a π shift of the Berry phase. On the other hand, we revisit an example of degeneracy crossing proposed by AA. We find that, at suitable driving frequencies, both geometric-phase definitions give the same result and the dynamical phase is zero due to the symmetry of time evolution about the point of degeneracy, providing an advantageous setup for manipulation of quantum states.
Geometric phase of mixed state for three-level open system is defined by establishing in connecting density matrix with nonunit vector ray in a three-dimensional complex Hilbert space. Because the geometric phase depends only on the smooth curve on this space, it is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures. Under the limiting of pure state, our approach is in agreement with the Berry phase, Pantcharatnam phase, and Aharonov and Anandan phase. We find that, furthermore, the Berry phase of mixed state correlated to population inversions of three-level open system.
We present the time evolution of the electronic two-level model in rotating wave approximation and calculate the Aharonov–Anandan phase of the vector states with cyclic evolution either within the period of an external monochromatic electric field or the period corresponding to the generalized Rabi frequency. The Aharonov–Anandan phase in the most general case is shown to be dependent on the initial vector state, unless the system evolves in the adiabatic regime; in the latter case, the Aharonov–Anandan phase recovers Berry's phase. In the quasi-resonant regime of the electronic two-level model, the different relations between Γ and the frequency ω of the electric field correspond to distinct regimes of the coupling between this external field and matter.