© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Control of the Geometric Phase and Nonequivalence between Geometric-Phase Definitions in the Adiabatic Limit

Xiaosong Zhu, Peixiang Lu, Manfred Lein

Published Jan 20, 2022• 23 citations

Abstract

If the time evolution of a quantum state leads back to the initial state, a geometric phase is accumulated that is known as the Berry phase for adiabatic evolution or as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase for nonadiabatic evolution. We evaluate these geometric phases using Floquet theory for systems in time-dependent external fields with a focus on paths leading through a degeneracy of the eigenenergies. Contrary to expectations, the low-frequency limits of the two phases do not always coincide. This happens as the degeneracy leads to a slow convergence of the quantum states to adiabaticity, resulting in a nonzero finite or divergent contribution to the AA phase. Steering the system adiabatically through a degeneracy provides control over the geometric phase as it can cause a π shift of the Berry phase. On the other hand, we revisit an example of degeneracy crossing proposed by AA. We find that, at suitable driving frequencies, both geometric-phase definitions give the same result and the dynamical phase is zero due to the symmetry of time evolution about the point of degeneracy, providing an advantageous setup for manipulation of quantum states.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.030401

Related papers

TIME EVOLUTION AND AHARONOV-ANANDAN PHASE FOR SYSTEM WITH DYNAMICAL SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRA

许晶波, 高隽, 高孝纯

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION Since Berry’s discovery of the geometric phase in quantum adiabatic evolution, there has been increased interest in this holonomy phenomenon referred to as Berry phase. Aharonov and Anandan removed the adiabatic condition and studied the geometric phase (AA phase) for any cyclic evolution. AA phase and Berry phase have been verified in experi

中国科学通报：英文版•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Measurement protocol for non-adiabatic geometric phases of Floquet states

Carlos Martín-Fernández, Gloria Platero, Sigmund Kohler

Periodically time-dependent quantum systems have Floquet solutions. They consist of a phase factor and a Floquet mode which shares the periodicity of the driving. Consequently, any such solution possesses a non adiabatic geometric phase known as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase. It is gauge-invariant and, therefore, is experimentally accessible. We propose a protocol for the measurement of AA phases based on the adiabatic change of the phase of the non-adiabatic driving. We argue that the experimental requirements of the protocol are those of previous measurements of adiabatic phases.

cond-mat.mes-hallCross-listedarXiv:2609.31052•Sep 28, 2026•0 citations

Geometric-phase control of Krylov complexity in adiabatic dynamics

Han-Qi Zheng, Peng-Zhang He, Lei-Hua Liu +1 more

We show that geometric phases accumulated during adiabatic evolution can be converted into observable interference in Krylov space, leading to a geometric-phase-dependent Krylov oscillation. Adiabatic dynamics force Krylov complexity to vanish if the initial Krylov basis is an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian; Nevertheless, we demonstrate that the Krylov complexity will be non-vanishing if the initial Krylov basis is a superposition state rather than an eigenstate. Consequently, Krylov complexity is found to depend on the difference of dynamical phases in the Krylov space, which is deeply related to the Berry connections in the original Hilbert space. In particular, for a single qubit system with constant Lanczos coefficients, Krylov complexity oscillates harmonically at a frequency given by the strength of the external field and the geometric Berry phase. Therefore, our work may provide a novel avenue to probe the geometric phase from the Krylov complexity.

quant-pharXiv:2608.14325•Aug 17, 2026•0 citations

Inconsistency of the theory of geometric phases in adiabatic evolution

Da-Jian Zhang, P. Z. Zhao, Guofu Xu

We unveil that even an infinitesimal deviation of the initial state from the eigenstates of the initial Hamiltonian can yield a significant change in the geometric phase accompanying adiabatic evolution without degeneracies of the energy levels. This leads to the counterintuitive result that the values of two geometric phases computed from the general definition of the Berry phase [Samuel and Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2339 (1988)] can dramatically differ from each other in the adiabatic limit even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner. The result of this work indicates that the widely accepted theory of geometric phases is not very consistent in the context of adiabatic evolution involving superposed eigenstates.

Physical Review A•Apr 12, 2022•2 citations

Cyclic quantum evolution and Aharonov-Anandan geometric phases in SU(2) spin-coherent states

Eric G. Layton, Youhong Huang, Shih‐I Chu

We show that cyclic quantum evolution can be realized and the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) geometric phase can be determined for any spin-j system driven by periodic fields. Two methods are extended for the study of this problem: the generalized spin-coherent-state technique and the Floquet quasienergy approach. Using the former approach, we have developed a generalized Bloch-sphere model and presented a SU(2) Lie-group formulation of the AA geometric phase in the spin-coherent state. We show that the AA phase is equal to j times the solid angle enclosed by the trajectory traced out by the tip of a generalized Bloch vector. General analytic formulas are obtained for the Bloch vector trajectory and the AA geometric phase in terms of external physical parameters. In addition to these findings, we have also approached the same problem from an alternative but complementary point of view without recourse to the concept of coherent-state terminology. Here we first determine the Floquet quasienergy eigenvalues and eigenvectors for the spin-j system driven by periodic fields. This in turn allows the construction of the time-evolution propagator, the total wave function, and the AA geometric phase in a more general fashion.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1990•54 citations

Nonadiabatic geometric phases of multiphoton transitions in dissipative systems and spin-Jsystems

Eric G. Layton, Shih‐I Chu

We present new developments in nonadiabatic geometric phases along two lines for systems undergoing changes of quantum state in intense fields. We first present a geometric representation of the non-Hermitian Schrodinger equation and introduce the notion of a complex multiphoton Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase associated with dissipative two-level systems driven by periodic fields. The concept is further extended to include field modulation effects. We then develop the AA phase for spin-j systems in periodic fields and find conditions for cyclic evolution for general multi-level systems. In both cases, generalizations of the Floquet formalism lead to general analytical expressions for geometric phases that can be tested by experiments.

Radiation effects and defects in solids•Jul 1, 1994•0 citations

If the time evolution of a quantum state leads back to the initial state, a geometric phase is accumulated that is known as the Berry phase for adiabatic evolution or as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase for nonadiabatic evolution. We evaluate these geometric phases using Floquet theory for systems in time-dependent external fields with a focus on paths leading through a degeneracy of the eigenenergies. Contrary to expectations, the low-frequency limits of the two phases do not always coincide. This happens as the degeneracy leads to a slow convergence of the quantum states to adiabaticity, resulting in a nonzero finite or divergent contribution to the AA phase. Steering the system adiabatically through a degeneracy provides control over the geometric phase as it can cause a π shift of the Berry phase. On the other hand, we revisit an example of degeneracy crossing proposed by AA. We find that, at suitable driving frequencies, both geometric-phase definitions give the same result and the dynamical phase is zero due to the symmetry of time evolution about the point of degeneracy, providing an advantageous setup for manipulation of quantum states.

Periodically time-dependent quantum systems have Floquet solutions. They consist of a phase factor and a Floquet mode which shares the periodicity of the driving. Consequently, any such solution possesses a non adiabatic geometric phase known as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase. It is gauge-invariant and, therefore, is experimentally accessible. We propose a protocol for the measurement of AA phases based on the adiabatic change of the phase of the non-adiabatic driving. We argue that the experimental requirements of the protocol are those of previous measurements of adiabatic phases.

We show that geometric phases accumulated during adiabatic evolution can be converted into observable interference in Krylov space, leading to a geometric-phase-dependent Krylov oscillation. Adiabatic dynamics force Krylov complexity to vanish if the initial Krylov basis is an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian; Nevertheless, we demonstrate that the Krylov complexity will be non-vanishing if the initial Krylov basis is a superposition state rather than an eigenstate. Consequently, Krylov complexity is found to depend on the difference of dynamical phases in the Krylov space, which is deeply related to the Berry connections in the original Hilbert space. In particular, for a single qubit system with constant Lanczos coefficients, Krylov complexity oscillates harmonically at a frequency given by the strength of the external field and the geometric Berry phase. Therefore, our work may provide a novel avenue to probe the geometric phase from the Krylov complexity.

We unveil that even an infinitesimal deviation of the initial state from the eigenstates of the initial Hamiltonian can yield a significant change in the geometric phase accompanying adiabatic evolution without degeneracies of the energy levels. This leads to the counterintuitive result that the values of two geometric phases computed from the general definition of the Berry phase [Samuel and Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2339 (1988)] can dramatically differ from each other in the adiabatic limit even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner. The result of this work indicates that the widely accepted theory of geometric phases is not very consistent in the context of adiabatic evolution involving superposed eigenstates.

We show that cyclic quantum evolution can be realized and the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) geometric phase can be determined for any spin-j system driven by periodic fields. Two methods are extended for the study of this problem: the generalized spin-coherent-state technique and the Floquet quasienergy approach. Using the former approach, we have developed a generalized Bloch-sphere model and presented a SU(2) Lie-group formulation of the AA geometric phase in the spin-coherent state. We show that the AA phase is equal to j times the solid angle enclosed by the trajectory traced out by the tip of a generalized Bloch vector. General analytic formulas are obtained for the Bloch vector trajectory and the AA geometric phase in terms of external physical parameters. In addition to these findings, we have also approached the same problem from an alternative but complementary point of view without recourse to the concept of coherent-state terminology. Here we first determine the Floquet quasienergy eigenvalues and eigenvectors for the spin-j system driven by periodic fields. This in turn allows the construction of the time-evolution propagator, the total wave function, and the AA geometric phase in a more general fashion.

We present new developments in nonadiabatic geometric phases along two lines for systems undergoing changes of quantum state in intense fields. We first present a geometric representation of the non-Hermitian Schrodinger equation and introduce the notion of a complex multiphoton Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase associated with dissipative two-level systems driven by periodic fields. The concept is further extended to include field modulation effects. We then develop the AA phase for spin-j systems in periodic fields and find conditions for cyclic evolution for general multi-level systems. In both cases, generalizations of the Floquet formalism lead to general analytical expressions for geometric phases that can be tested by experiments.