Beables for quantum field theory
J S Bell
Introduction Bohm's 1952 papers on quantum mechanics were for me a revelation. The elimination of indeterminism was very striking. But more important, it seemed to me, was the elimination of any need for a vague division of the world into ‘system’ on the one hand, and ‘apparatus’ or ‘observer’ on the other. I have always felt since that people who have not grasped the ideas of those papers … and unfortunately they remain the majority … are handicapped in any discussion of the meaning of quantum mechanics. When the cogency of Bohm's reasoning is admitted, a final protest is often this: it is all nonrelativistic. This is to ignore that Bohm himself, in an appendix to one of the 1952 papers, already applied his scheme to the electromagnetic field. And application to scalar fields is straightforward. However until recently, to my knowledge, no extension covering Fermi fields had been made. Such an extension will be sketched here. The need for Fermi fields might be questioned. Fermions might be composite structures of some kind. But also they might not be, or not all. The present exercise will not only include Fermi fields, but even give them a central role. The dependence on the ideas of de Broglie and Bohm, and also on my own simplified extension to cover spin, will be manifest to those familiar with these things. However no such familiarity will be assumed.
Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 3, 2004•112 citations