Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optik

Geometric phase and non-stationary state

Qian Liu, Runsheng Wu, Hualan Xu, Yanxia Yu, Hui Pan, Zisheng Wang

Published Jun 24, 2014• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.04.052

Related papers

The geometric phase in a simple model

Harald Grosse, W. L. Kennedy

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 1991•5 citations

A Non-Parametric Trajectory Model for Atomic Stationary States on the Fuzzy Sphere

Ross G. MacLean

This paper introduces an alternative, purely relational geometric ontology for the atom, modelling the electron as a localized, point-like entity executing a continuous, high-frequency, non-smooth trajectory across a non-commutative spherical manifold. By utilizing non-parametric intervals and a Principle of Least Algebraic Resistance, the model derives quantized atomic shells, geometric phase spins, and the Pauli Exclusion Principle purely as topological inevitabilities, bypassing wave-particle dualism and standard uncertainty paradoxes.

•Jun 27, 2026•0 citations

Dissipative quantum geometric phase in the spin-boson system

Boyu Wang, Milan Radonjić, Florian Otterpohl +1 more

We explore how the dissipative geometric phase evolves within the spin-boson model, focusing specifically on coupling to an Ohmic bath in the weakly coherent regime. To determine the non-unitary time evolution of the system's reduced density matrix, we employ the non-interacting blip approximation (NIBA). For the localized pure initial state used throughout, we derive a compact Bloch-sphere expression showing that the mixed-state geometric phase is a weighted azimuthal winding of the dissipative trajectory. We then map geometric-phase accumulation across various system-bath coupling strengths, temperatures, static biases, and bath cutoff frequencies. Benchmarking representative results against the numerically exact time-evolving matrix product operator (TEMPO) technique shows that NIBA reproduces the population dynamics almost indistinguishably. It also captures the geometric phase quantitatively and qualitatively, although TEMPO reveals a clearer trend in the stationary coherence. Our results show that quantum dissipation suppresses the geometric phase through two complementary mechanisms: thermal noise reduces the state's purity, while static bias localizes the dynamics and reduces the accessible geometric area.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jun 8, 2026•0 citations

Generalised geometric phase

Vivek M. Vyas

arXiv:2301.10929•Physics Letters A•Sep 16, 2025•0 citations

Non-adiabatic geometric phases and dephasing in an open quantum system

Aleksandr E. Svetogorov, Yu. Makhlin

We analyze the influence of a dissipative environment on geometric phases in a quantum system subject to non-adiabatic evolution. We find dissipative contributions to the acquired phase and modification of dephasing, considering the cases of both weak short-correlated noise and slow quasi-stationary noise. Motivated by recent experiments, we find the leading non-adiabatic corrections to the results, known for the adiabatic limit.

arXiv:1604.05100•Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters•Apr 1, 2016•0 citations

Geometric phases and coherent states

Timothy R Field, Jeeva S. Anandan

Journal of Geometry and Physics•Jan 27, 2004•12 citations
This paper introduces an alternative, purely relational geometric ontology for the atom, modelling the electron as a localized, point-like entity executing a continuous, high-frequency, non-smooth trajectory across a non-commutative spherical manifold. By utilizing non-parametric intervals and a Principle of Least Algebraic Resistance, the model derives quantized atomic shells, geometric phase spins, and the Pauli Exclusion Principle purely as topological inevitabilities, bypassing wave-particle dualism and standard uncertainty paradoxes.
We explore how the dissipative geometric phase evolves within the spin-boson model, focusing specifically on coupling to an Ohmic bath in the weakly coherent regime. To determine the non-unitary time evolution of the system's reduced density matrix, we employ the non-interacting blip approximation (NIBA). For the localized pure initial state used throughout, we derive a compact Bloch-sphere expression showing that the mixed-state geometric phase is a weighted azimuthal winding of the dissipative trajectory. We then map geometric-phase accumulation across various system-bath coupling strengths, temperatures, static biases, and bath cutoff frequencies. Benchmarking representative results against the numerically exact time-evolving matrix product operator (TEMPO) technique shows that NIBA reproduces the population dynamics almost indistinguishably. It also captures the geometric phase quantitatively and qualitatively, although TEMPO reveals a clearer trend in the stationary coherence. Our results show that quantum dissipation suppresses the geometric phase through two complementary mechanisms: thermal noise reduces the state's purity, while static bias localizes the dynamics and reduces the accessible geometric area.