The historical and geometrical origin of Gauge Transformation and Yang's phase loop of gauge theory are discussed. In the present talk, we present the following points: 1. Parallel transport of a vector; 2. Weyl 1918 gauge transformation 3. Concept of non-integrable phase factor; 4. Berry's quantum geometrical phase; 5. Parallel transport of quantum state vector produces the phase physics.
The historical and geometrical origin of Gauge Transformation and Yang's phase loop of gauge theory are discussed. In the present talk, we present the following points: 1. Parallel transport of a vector; 2. Weyl 1918 gauge transformation 3. Concept of non-integrable phase factor; 4. Berry's quantum geometrical phase; 5. Parallel transport of quantum state vector produces the phase physics.
We discuss the quantization of fermions interacting with external fields and observe the occurrence of equivalent as well as inequivalent representations of the canonical anticommutation relations. Implementability of gauge and axial gauge transformations leads to generators which fulfil an algebra of current with a Schwinger term. This term can be written as a cocycle and leads to the boson-fermion correspondence. Transport of a quantum-mechanical system along a closed loop of parameter space may yield a geometric phase. We discuss models for which nonintegrable phase factors are obtained from the adiabatic parallel transport. After second quantization, one obtains, in addition, a Schwinger term. Depending on the type of transformation, a subtle relationship between these two obstructions can occur. We indicate finally how we may transport density matrices along closed loops in parameter space.
Neither geometric phases nor differences in geometric phases are generally invariant under time-dependent unitary transformations (unlike differences in total phases), in particular under local gauge transformations and Galilei transformations. (This was pointed out originally by Aharonov and Anandan, and in the case of Galilei transformations has recently been shown explicitly by Sjoeqvist, Brown and Carlsen.) In this paper, I introduce a phase, related to the standard geometric phase, for which phase differences are both gauge- and Galilei-invariant, and, indeed, invariant under transformations to linearly accelerated coordinate systems. I discuss in what sense this phase can also be viewed as geometric, what its relation is to earlier proposals for making geometric phases invariant under gauge or Galilei transformations, and what is its classical analogue. I finally apply this invariant phase to Berry's derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
The analysis of geometric phases is briefly reviewed by emphasizing various gauge symmetries involved. The analysis of geometric phases associated with level crossing is reduced to the familiar diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in the second quantized formulation. A hidden local gauge symmetry becomes explicit in this formulation and specifies physical observables; the choice of a basis set which specifies the coordinates in the functional space is arbitrary in the second quantization, and a sub-class of coordinate transformations, which keeps the form of the action invariant, is recognized as the gauge symmetry. It is shown that the hidden local symmetry provides a basic concept which replaces the notions of parallel transport and holonomy. We also point out that our hidden local gauge symmetry is quite different from a gauge symmetry used by Aharonov and Anandan in their definition of non-adiabatic phases.
Geometric phase is an interesting topic that is germane to numerous and varied research areas: molecules, optics, quantum computing, quantum Hall effect, graphene, and so on. It exists only when the system of interest interacts with something it perceives as exterior. An isolated system cannot display geometric phase. This article addresses geometric phase in polyatomic molecules from a gauge field theory perspective. Gauge field theory was introduced in electrodynamics by Fock and examined assiduously by Weyl. It yields the gauge field A(μ), particle-field couplings, and the Aharonov-Bohm phase, while Yang-Mills theory, the cornerstone of the standard model of physics, is a template for non-Abelian gauge symmetries. Electronic structure theory, including nonadiabaticity, is a non-Abelian gauge field theory with matrix-valued covariant derivative. Because the wave function of an isolated molecule must be single-valued, its global U(1) symmetry cannot be gauged, i.e., products of nuclear and electron functions such as χ(n)ψ(n) are forbidden from undergoing local phase transformation on R, where R denotes nuclear degrees of freedom. On the other hand, the synchronous transformations (first noted by Mead and Truhlar): ψ(n)→ψ(n)e(iζ) and simultaneously χ(n)→χ(n)e(-iζ), preserve single-valuedness and enable wave functions in each subspace to undergo phase transformation on R. Thus, each subspace is compatible with a U(1) gauge field theory. The central mathematical object is Berry's adiabatic connection i<n|∇n>, which serves as a communication link between the two subsystems. It is shown that additions to the connection according to the gauge principle are, in fact, manifestations of the synchronous (e(iζ)/e(-iζ)) nature of the ψ(n) and χ(n) phase transformations. Two important U(1) connections are reviewed: qA(μ) from electrodynamics and Berry's connection. The gauging of SU(2) and SU(3) is reviewed and then used with molecules. The largest gauge group applicable in the immediate vicinity of a two-state intersection is U(2), which factors to U(1) × SU(2). Gauging SU(2) yields three fields, whereas U(1) is not gauged, as the result cannot be brought into registry with electronic structure theory, and there are other problems as well. A parallel with spontaneous symmetry breaking in electroweak theory is noted. Loss of SU(2) symmetry as the energy gap between adiabats increases yields the inter-related U(1) symmetries of the upper and lower adiabats, with spinor character imprinted in the vicinity of the degeneracy.
Formulations of quantum mechanics incorporating the Weyl gauge transformations are studied in this article and developed further. In the process, impact of the method of observation on its outcome is interpreted in terms of the assigned gauges by incorporating properties of the corresponding experimental arrangement in defining them. Further, the assigned gauge is explicitly incorporated in the Feynman path integral formulation of quantum mechanics. The resulting wavefunction, which is not uniquely defined, represents a gauge equivalence class. The representative wavefunction is still obtained by the original path integral method. Methods to obtain the pertinent information about the assigned gauges supplementing the representative wavefunction are discussed. The probability density is shown to be a uniquely defined gauge invariant quantity but at the expense of some information describing the observable effects contained in gauge factors. In the standard quantum mechanics, a wavefunction is assumed to be defined within a phase factor while the probability density is phase-independent, paralleling these results. Also, the path integral method is used to deduce the Klein-Gordon equation for the representative wavefunction in the Riemannian spaces in a more streamlined manner than the previous derivations.
The geometric phase is the comparison the of a physical quantity due to the changes on a closed cruve in the system state space. These phases are experimentally measurable because of, that the space of a time dependent quantum system may be a curveture, therefore the Holonomy arises from this curveture. The Berry phase has three key features, which makes it very important. First, the Berry phase is gauge invariance. Especial functions are defined by aequal linear equation, hence it has a multiplicative guage freedom in a general phase factor independent of the parameter. Berry phase (forget from on phase factor ) with this phase factor remains unchanged provided that the special function is on a single loop value. This makes the Berry phase to be a physical quantity that is experimentally measureable by inter ference phenomena. Secondly, Berry phase is a geometric concept. that’s mean it can be written as a linear integral of loop in parameter space, which does not depend on the rate of change on the loop. This property makes it mesureable the Berry phase in terms of local geometric quantites in the parameter space. In fact, Berry showed that this phase can be written as a find integral (Berry curve) on the surface. Berry curve plays an essential role in effective dynamics with variables with degrees of slow release. Third, the Berry phase is similar to that of guage field and differential geometry theory. This makes beauty, intuition and the same concept in physics.