Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics

Randomization of quantum relative phase in welcher Weg measurements

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Published Nov 16, 1999• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Welcher Weg (which-path) detectors where complementarity is enforced without altering the interfering beams are analysed in terms of the quantum relative phase. In such a case, the measurement disturbs the interference via random classical phase shifts. This applies when the interfering particles are atoms or photons. In the case of photons, the quantum relative phase coincides with the field phase difference.

DOI
10.1088/1464-4266/1/6/309

Related papers

Complementarity Enforced by Random Classical Phase Kicks

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Quantum phase difference is used to analyze which-path detectors in which the loss of interference predicted by complementarity cannot be attributed to classical momentum transfer between the interfering particle and the measuring apparatus. It is shown that the dynamics of the measurement disturbs the interference via random classical phase shifts.

Physical Review Letters•Nov 9, 1998•34 citations

Quantum Optical Discussion of Uncertainty and Complementarity in a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Doron ludwin, Y. Ben-Aryeh, A. Mann

We discuss complementarity and uncertainty in a gedanken Which-Way (Welcher-Weg) experiment in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Although a Welcher-Weg measurement can be performed with only a negligible amount of momentum change in the detector itself, the change in the interference pattern must correspond to a change in the momentum distribution of the particle. Entanglement between the Mach-Zehnder interferometer and the Welcher-Weg measurement introduces orthogonality that disables the interference of the particle, but simultaneously, it also generates a momentum transfer between the particle and other parts of the whole entangled system (including macroscopic parts). This analysis can be related to the Delayed Choice interpretation. We show where the momentum change takes place and we conclude that entanglement is the key to understand how complementarity (i.e. Which Way versus interference) and the position-momentum uncertainty relation are interwoven.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008096•Aug 23, 2000•0 citations

Two-photon interferometry, the quantum measurement problem, and more

Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

As was demonstrated in the previous chapter, the process of observation and acquisition of information or at least the possibility of ‘knowing’ (whether or not we bother to ‘look’) can profoundly change the outcome of an experiment. For example, in the case of the micromaser which-path detector, we do not need to ‘look at’ or ‘interrogate’ the masers in order to lose the interference cross term; it is enough that we could have known. Experiments along these lines provide a dramatic example of the importance of which-path, or ‘Welcher-Weg’, information. The present chapter treats the Welcher-Weg quantum eraser problem from a different vantage. We first consider the interference of light as it is scattered from simple atomic systems consisting of single atoms located at two neighboring sites. From this simple model, we can gain a wealth of insight into such problems as complementarity, delayed choice, and the quantum eraser via field–field and photon–photon correlation functions, i.e., via G (1) ( r , t ) and G (2) ( r , r ′ t , t ′). The chapter concludes with a demonstration that such considerations can, in principle, even lead to new kinds of high-resolution spectroscopy.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 4, 1997•0 citations

Complementarity and quantum erasure with dispersive atom-field interactions

Christopher C. Gerry

The "welcher Weg" (which-path) detector as described by Scully et al. [Nature 351, 111 (1991)] employs a pair of initially empty micromaser cavities placed in front of a double-slit apparatus in an atomic interferometer. Laser excited atoms spontaneously emit a photon into either cavity thereby marking the atoms' path and thereby destroying the interference. I propose an alternative method wherein at least one of the cavities is prepared in a coherent state with a strong amplitude. Which-path information is obtained by a nonresonant, dispersive type of atom-field interaction associated with quantum nondemolition measurements. Ground-state atoms passing through the cavity remain in the ground state but impart a phase shift to the cavity fields. Velocity selection is shown to affect the visibility of the fringes. An associated quantum eraser is also discussed.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1996•22 citations

Decoherence due to the geometric phase in a ‘‘welcher-weg’’ experiment

Rajendra Bhandari

We describe a new version of the well-known gedanken experiments to determine which of the two paths a particle took in a two-beam interference experiment. In this version the presence of a geometric phase can be deduced from the requirement that the interference pattern must disappear as a result of the welcher-weg (which path) information.

Physical Review Letters•Dec 28, 1992•14 citations

Optical interference by amplitude measurement

Yunxiao Zhang, Xuan Tang, Xueshi Guo +3 more

Interference effects are usually observed by intensity measurement. Path indistinguishability by the quantum complementarity principle requires projection of the interfering fields into a common indistinguishable mode before detection. On the other hand, the essence of wave interference is the addition of amplitudes of the interfering fields. Therefore, if amplitudes can be directly measured and added, interference can occur even though the interfering fields are in well-distinguishable modes. Here, we make a comprehensive study in both theory and experiment of a technique by homodyne measurement of field amplitudes to reveal interference. This works for both classical and quantum fields even though there exists distinguishability in the interfering paths of light. This directly challenges the complementarity principle. We present a resolution of this issue from the viewpoint of measurement that emphasizes either particle or wave. This technique is particularly useful for recovering interference in unbalanced interferometers with path imbalance beyond a coherence length of the input field and can be applied to remote sensing to extend the applicable range. Since the amplitude-based interference phenomena studied here are fundamentally different from the traditional intensity-based interference phenomena, our approach leads to a new paradigm to study coherence between optical fields.

arXiv:2502.04010•Physical Review Research•Mar 7, 2025•4 citations
Welcher Weg (which-path) detectors where complementarity is enforced without altering the interfering beams are analysed in terms of the quantum relative phase. In such a case, the measurement disturbs the interference via random classical phase shifts. This applies when the interfering particles are atoms or photons. In the case of photons, the quantum relative phase coincides with the field phase difference.
We discuss complementarity and uncertainty in a gedanken Which-Way (Welcher-Weg) experiment in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Although a Welcher-Weg measurement can be performed with only a negligible amount of momentum change in the detector itself, the change in the interference pattern must correspond to a change in the momentum distribution of the particle. Entanglement between the Mach-Zehnder interferometer and the Welcher-Weg measurement introduces orthogonality that disables the interference of the particle, but simultaneously, it also generates a momentum transfer between the particle and other parts of the whole entangled system (including macroscopic parts). This analysis can be related to the Delayed Choice interpretation. We show where the momentum change takes place and we conclude that entanglement is the key to understand how complementarity (i.e. Which Way versus interference) and the position-momentum uncertainty relation are interwoven.
As was demonstrated in the previous chapter, the process of observation and acquisition of information or at least the possibility of ‘knowing’ (whether or not we bother to ‘look’) can profoundly change the outcome of an experiment. For example, in the case of the micromaser which-path detector, we do not need to ‘look at’ or ‘interrogate’ the masers in order to lose the interference cross term; it is enough that we could have known. Experiments along these lines provide a dramatic example of the importance of which-path, or ‘Welcher-Weg’, information. The present chapter treats the Welcher-Weg quantum eraser problem from a different vantage. We first consider the interference of light as it is scattered from simple atomic systems consisting of single atoms located at two neighboring sites. From this simple model, we can gain a wealth of insight into such problems as complementarity, delayed choice, and the quantum eraser via field–field and photon–photon correlation functions, i.e., via G (1) ( r , t ) and G (2) ( r , r ′ t , t ′). The chapter concludes with a demonstration that such considerations can, in principle, even lead to new kinds of high-resolution spectroscopy.
The "welcher Weg" (which-path) detector as described by Scully et al. [Nature 351, 111 (1991)] employs a pair of initially empty micromaser cavities placed in front of a double-slit apparatus in an atomic interferometer. Laser excited atoms spontaneously emit a photon into either cavity thereby marking the atoms' path and thereby destroying the interference. I propose an alternative method wherein at least one of the cavities is prepared in a coherent state with a strong amplitude. Which-path information is obtained by a nonresonant, dispersive type of atom-field interaction associated with quantum nondemolition measurements. Ground-state atoms passing through the cavity remain in the ground state but impart a phase shift to the cavity fields. Velocity selection is shown to affect the visibility of the fringes. An associated quantum eraser is also discussed.
Interference effects are usually observed by intensity measurement. Path indistinguishability by the quantum complementarity principle requires projection of the interfering fields into a common indistinguishable mode before detection. On the other hand, the essence of wave interference is the addition of amplitudes of the interfering fields. Therefore, if amplitudes can be directly measured and added, interference can occur even though the interfering fields are in well-distinguishable modes. Here, we make a comprehensive study in both theory and experiment of a technique by homodyne measurement of field amplitudes to reveal interference. This works for both classical and quantum fields even though there exists distinguishability in the interfering paths of light. This directly challenges the complementarity principle. We present a resolution of this issue from the viewpoint of measurement that emphasizes either particle or wave. This technique is particularly useful for recovering interference in unbalanced interferometers with path imbalance beyond a coherence length of the input field and can be applied to remote sensing to extend the applicable range. Since the amplitude-based interference phenomena studied here are fundamentally different from the traditional intensity-based interference phenomena, our approach leads to a new paradigm to study coherence between optical fields.