Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Information Processing Letters

The quantum query complexity of learning multilinear polynomials

Ashley Montanaro

Published Mar 6, 2012• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.ipl.2012.03.002

Related papers

An Exponential Separation Between Quantum Query Complexity and the Polynomial Degree

Andris Ambainis, Aleksandrs Belovs

Computational Complexity•Oct 3, 2025•0 citations

Polynomial degree vs. quantum query complexity

Andris Ambainis

Journal of Computer and System Sciences•Nov 30, 2005•147 citations

The Quantum Query Complexity of Algebraic Properties

Sebastian Dörn, Thomas Thierauf

Lecture notes in computer science•Aug 27, 2007•18 citations

The quantum query complexity of learning multilinear polynomials

Ashley Montanaro

In this note we study the number of quantum queries required to identify an unknown multilinear polynomial of degree d in n variables over a finite field F_q. Any bounded-error classical algorithm for this task requires Omega(n^d) queries to the polynomial. We give an exact quantum algorithm that uses O(n^(d-1)) queries for constant d, which is optimal. In the case q=2, this gives a quantum algorithm that uses O(n^(d-1)) queries to identify a codeword picked from the binary Reed-Muller code of order d.

arXiv:1105.3310•May 17, 2011•0 citations

Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality

Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, Jānis Iraids +2 more

We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function f is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by epsilon<1/2 iff f can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by epsilon'<1/2. This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015]. The proof uses Grothendieck's inequality to relate two matrix norms, with one norm corresponding to polynomial approximations and the other norm corresponding to quantum algorithms. We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires ~Omega(n) quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree ~O(sqrt(n)). Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear polynomials are not equivalent to quantum algorithms. Second, for any constant degree k, the two notions of approximation by a polynomial (the standard and the block-multilinear) are equivalent. As a consequence, we solve an open problem from [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015], showing that one can estimate the value of any bounded degree-k polynomial p:{0,1}^n -> [-1,1] with O(n^{1-1/(2k)) queries.

arXiv:1511.08682•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Nov 27, 2015•16 citations

Quantum Query Complexity in Computational Geometry

Abhinav Bahadur, Christoph Dürr, Raghav Kulkarni +1 more

•Jan 1, 2006•1 citation
In this note we study the number of quantum queries required to identify an unknown multilinear polynomial of degree d in n variables over a finite field F_q. Any bounded-error classical algorithm for this task requires Omega(n^d) queries to the polynomial. We give an exact quantum algorithm that uses O(n^(d-1)) queries for constant d, which is optimal. In the case q=2, this gives a quantum algorithm that uses O(n^(d-1)) queries to identify a codeword picked from the binary Reed-Muller code of order d.
We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function f is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by epsilon<1/2 iff f can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by epsilon'<1/2. This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015]. The proof uses Grothendieck's inequality to relate two matrix norms, with one norm corresponding to polynomial approximations and the other norm corresponding to quantum algorithms. We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires ~Omega(n) quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree ~O(sqrt(n)). Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear polynomials are not equivalent to quantum algorithms. Second, for any constant degree k, the two notions of approximation by a polynomial (the standard and the block-multilinear) are equivalent. As a consequence, we solve an open problem from [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015], showing that one can estimate the value of any bounded degree-k polynomial p:{0,1}^n -> [-1,1] with O(n^{1-1/(2k)) queries.