The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the quantum query complexity of f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. We exhibit a function with polynomial degree M and quantum query complexity (M/sup 1.321.../). This is the first superlinear separation between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity. The lower bound is shown by a new, more general version of quantum adversary method.
The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the number of quantum queries needed to compute f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. We exhibit a function with polynomial degree M and quantum query complexity Ω(M^{1.321...}). This is the first superlinear separation between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity. The lower bound is shown by a new, more general version of quantum adversary method.
It is known that the classical and quantum query complexities of a total Boolean function f are polynomially related to the degree of its representing polynomial, but the optimal exponents in these relations are unknown. We show that the non-deterministic quantum query complexity of f is linearly related to the degree of a "non-deterministic" polynomial for f. We also prove a quantum-classical gap of 1 vs. N for non-deterministic query complexity for a total f. In the case of quantum communication complexity there is a (partly undetermined) relation between the complexity of f and the logarithm of the rank of its communication matrix. We show that the non-deterministic quantum communication complexity of f is linearly related to the logarithm of the rank of a non-deterministic version of the communication matrix and that it can be exponentially smaller than its classical counterpart.