Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

The unitary group formulation of the N- particle problem

F. A. Matsen

Published Jun 18, 2009• 55 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The representation of an N-particle Hamiltonian on an Nth rank orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second-degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which are bases for the irreducible representations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form, as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian. The exclusion principle is imposed by restricting the irreducible representations of the unitary group. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard many-body theory for the particle-conserving case.

DOI
10.1002/qua.560080841

Related papers

Spin‐Free quantum chemistry. XVIII. The unitary group formulation of the many‐electron problem

F. A. Matsen

Abstract The representation of an N‐electron Schrödinger Hamiltonian on an orthonormal, spin‐free (freon) orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second‐degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the orbital product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which provide base for irreducible represntations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian in this same basis. We retain as physical only those states characterized by tableaux with no more than two columns for which the spin labelling is one‐half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard, number‐conserving, second‐quantized, many‐body theory.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•May 1, 1976•34 citations

Particle-hole gel'fand states and quasidegenerate perturbation theory

F. A. Matsen

The unitary group formulation of many-body theory is based on particle-hole Gel'fand states, states labeled only by the excitation process: h(hole orbitals)-p(particle orbitals). The particle-hole Gel'fand states are constructed from generator states, states obtained by applying weight-lowering products of generators to the highest weight state and then evaluating the matrix elements Lie algebraically. We make application to spin-projected, quasidegenerate perturbation theory.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 19, 2009•0 citations

Spin‐free quantum theory. XXV. The unitary‐group formulation of fermion many‐body theory

F. A. Matsen

Abstract The fermion unitary group formulation (UGF) of many‐body theory is based on the unitary group U(2n) where n is the number of freeon orbitals. This formulation, which conserves particle‐number but not spin, is isomorphic to the particle‐number‐conserving, second‐quantized formulation (SQF). In UGF we derive the familiar diagrammatic algorithm for matrix elements, M(Y) = (−1)H+L where H and L denote the numbers of hole lines and loops in the diagram D(Y) of M(Y). The unitary group derivation is considerably simpler than is the conventional, second‐quantized derivation that employs time‐dependence, Wick's theorem, normal‐order, and contractions. In neither fermion UGF nor SQF is spin conserved. We carry out in UGF the spin‐projection (symmetry adaptation to SU(2)) of the fermion vectors and obtain with a spin‐free Hamiltonian the same matrix elements as with the freeon UGF (part 24 of this series). The fermion unitary group formulation for a spin‐free Hamiltonian should be regarded as an alternate path to spin‐free quantum chemistry.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jul 1, 1987•6 citations

The unitary-group formulation of coupled-cluster many-electron theory

F. A. Matsen

Coupled-cluster many-electron theory (CCMET) has been developed in the second-quantized formulation with and without spin projection. In this article CCMET is developed in the unitary-group formulation where the group is U(p) and p is the number of orbitals in the basis set. The zero-order ground state is the highest-weight state of an irreducibly invariant subspace of U(p) and the excitation operators are infinitesimal generators. These irreducible spaces are uniquely labeled by Young diagrams which the Pauli principle limits to no more than one column for fermion orbitals and no more than two columns for freeon (spin-free) orbitals. In the latter case the spin is one-half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. We employ both the Gel'fand and the generator bases for the irreducible invariant vector spaces. Matrix elements for the former are evaluated by techniques due to Gel'fand, Biedenharn, Louck, Paldus, and Shavitt and for the latter directly by Lie algebraic and diagrammatic techniques as a simple function of the weight components of the highest-weight state. For freeon or fermion orbitals the results are equivalent to those obtained by the second-quantized formulation with or without spin projection.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 18, 2009•0 citations

Particle-hole formulation of the unitary group approach to the many-electron correlation problem. I. State construction and classification

Josef Paldus, M. J. Boyle

A hole-particle version of the unitary group approach to the many-electron correlation problem is given. To achieve a unique state labeling, the subgroup chain of Flores and Moshinsky for the nuclear many-body problem is modified, and the rules for the construction of relevant irreducible representations and of the orthonormal spinadapted states are given. The structure of these hole-particle formalism spin-adapted bases is illustrated on several examples for all the three possible types of the hole-particle defect pertaining to the excitation, electron attachment, or detachment processes relative to the reference state used. The tensor character of the particle formalism electron-number-preserving generators is pointed out, and their basic classification in the hole-particle formalism is given.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1980•52 citations

A unitary group formulation of many‐body theory: The spin‐shift formalism

Barry Tennant Pickup, Atri Mukhopadhyay

Abstract This paper lays the algebraic foundation of a unitary group approach to many‐body theory. We define a set of second quantized spin‐shift operators which are used to construct spin‐adapted many‐electron configuration functions. We investigate the particle‐hole transformation, normal ordering, and contraction of spin shifts. This gives an orbital Wick's theorem reflecting the permutational structure of the states spanning the irreducible representations of the spatial unitary group. We study the spinless Hamiltonian, and the relationship between spin shifts and unitary group generators.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jul 1, 1984•13 citations
The representation of an N-particle Hamiltonian on an Nth rank orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second-degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which are bases for the irreducible representations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form, as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian. The exclusion principle is imposed by restricting the irreducible representations of the unitary group. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard many-body theory for the particle-conserving case.
Abstract The representation of an N‐electron Schrödinger Hamiltonian on an orthonormal, spin‐free (freon) orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second‐degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the orbital product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which provide base for irreducible represntations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian in this same basis. We retain as physical only those states characterized by tableaux with no more than two columns for which the spin labelling is one‐half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard, number‐conserving, second‐quantized, many‐body theory.
Abstract The fermion unitary group formulation (UGF) of many‐body theory is based on the unitary group U(2n) where n is the number of freeon orbitals. This formulation, which conserves particle‐number but not spin, is isomorphic to the particle‐number‐conserving, second‐quantized formulation (SQF). In UGF we derive the familiar diagrammatic algorithm for matrix elements, M(Y) = (−1)H+L where H and L denote the numbers of hole lines and loops in the diagram D(Y) of M(Y). The unitary group derivation is considerably simpler than is the conventional, second‐quantized derivation that employs time‐dependence, Wick's theorem, normal‐order, and contractions. In neither fermion UGF nor SQF is spin conserved. We carry out in UGF the spin‐projection (symmetry adaptation to SU(2)) of the fermion vectors and obtain with a spin‐free Hamiltonian the same matrix elements as with the freeon UGF (part 24 of this series). The fermion unitary group formulation for a spin‐free Hamiltonian should be regarded as an alternate path to spin‐free quantum chemistry.
Coupled-cluster many-electron theory (CCMET) has been developed in the second-quantized formulation with and without spin projection. In this article CCMET is developed in the unitary-group formulation where the group is U(p) and p is the number of orbitals in the basis set. The zero-order ground state is the highest-weight state of an irreducibly invariant subspace of U(p) and the excitation operators are infinitesimal generators. These irreducible spaces are uniquely labeled by Young diagrams which the Pauli principle limits to no more than one column for fermion orbitals and no more than two columns for freeon (spin-free) orbitals. In the latter case the spin is one-half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. We employ both the Gel'fand and the generator bases for the irreducible invariant vector spaces. Matrix elements for the former are evaluated by techniques due to Gel'fand, Biedenharn, Louck, Paldus, and Shavitt and for the latter directly by Lie algebraic and diagrammatic techniques as a simple function of the weight components of the highest-weight state. For freeon or fermion orbitals the results are equivalent to those obtained by the second-quantized formulation with or without spin projection.
A hole-particle version of the unitary group approach to the many-electron correlation problem is given. To achieve a unique state labeling, the subgroup chain of Flores and Moshinsky for the nuclear many-body problem is modified, and the rules for the construction of relevant irreducible representations and of the orthonormal spinadapted states are given. The structure of these hole-particle formalism spin-adapted bases is illustrated on several examples for all the three possible types of the hole-particle defect pertaining to the excitation, electron attachment, or detachment processes relative to the reference state used. The tensor character of the particle formalism electron-number-preserving generators is pointed out, and their basic classification in the hole-particle formalism is given.
Abstract This paper lays the algebraic foundation of a unitary group approach to many‐body theory. We define a set of second quantized spin‐shift operators which are used to construct spin‐adapted many‐electron configuration functions. We investigate the particle‐hole transformation, normal ordering, and contraction of spin shifts. This gives an orbital Wick's theorem reflecting the permutational structure of the states spanning the irreducible representations of the spatial unitary group. We study the spinless Hamiltonian, and the relationship between spin shifts and unitary group generators.