Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Spin‐free quantum theory. XXV. The unitary‐group formulation of fermion many‐body theory

F. A. Matsen

Published Jul 1, 1987• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract The fermion unitary group formulation (UGF) of many‐body theory is based on the unitary group U(2n) where n is the number of freeon orbitals. This formulation, which conserves particle‐number but not spin, is isomorphic to the particle‐number‐conserving, second‐quantized formulation (SQF). In UGF we derive the familiar diagrammatic algorithm for matrix elements, M(Y) = (−1)H+L where H and L denote the numbers of hole lines and loops in the diagram D(Y) of M(Y). The unitary group derivation is considerably simpler than is the conventional, second‐quantized derivation that employs time‐dependence, Wick's theorem, normal‐order, and contractions. In neither fermion UGF nor SQF is spin conserved. We carry out in UGF the spin‐projection (symmetry adaptation to SU(2)) of the fermion vectors and obtain with a spin‐free Hamiltonian the same matrix elements as with the freeon UGF (part 24 of this series). The fermion unitary group formulation for a spin‐free Hamiltonian should be regarded as an alternate path to spin‐free quantum chemistry.

DOI
10.1002/qua.560320110

Related papers

Spin‐free quantum chemistry. XXIV. Freeon many‐body theory

F. A. Matsen

Abstract We present the freeon, singlet, unitary group formulation of many‐body theory as an alternative to the particle‐number‐conserving, spin‐projected, fermion, second‐quantized formulation. It is based on the generator‐state‐approach (GSA) developed in part 23 of this series. We develop C1, perturbation, coupled‐cluster, and random‐phase theories.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jul 1, 1987•12 citations

Spin‐Free quantum chemistry. XVIII. The unitary group formulation of the many‐electron problem

F. A. Matsen

Abstract The representation of an N‐electron Schrödinger Hamiltonian on an orthonormal, spin‐free (freon) orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second‐degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the orbital product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which provide base for irreducible represntations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian in this same basis. We retain as physical only those states characterized by tableaux with no more than two columns for which the spin labelling is one‐half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard, number‐conserving, second‐quantized, many‐body theory.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•May 1, 1976•34 citations

A unitary group formulation of many‐body theory: The spin‐shift formalism

Barry Tennant Pickup, Atri Mukhopadhyay

Abstract This paper lays the algebraic foundation of a unitary group approach to many‐body theory. We define a set of second quantized spin‐shift operators which are used to construct spin‐adapted many‐electron configuration functions. We investigate the particle‐hole transformation, normal ordering, and contraction of spin shifts. This gives an orbital Wick's theorem reflecting the permutational structure of the states spanning the irreducible representations of the spatial unitary group. We study the spinless Hamiltonian, and the relationship between spin shifts and unitary group generators.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jul 1, 1984•13 citations

A unitary group formulation of many‐body theory: Diagram systematics and use of the spin shifts

Atri Mukhopadhyay, Barry Tennant Pickup

Abstract This paper shows that the spin‐shift formalism developed in B. T. Pickup and A. Mukhopadhyay [Int. J. Quantum Chem. 26, 101 (1984)] supports a one‐component diagrammatics which has a systematics akin to that in the spin‐orbital many‐body theory. The diagrams are neither Goldstone nor Yutsis type, and characterize the chain U(2R) ⊃ U(R)⊗SU(2) on which the spin‐shift formalism is based. Accordingly, while the lines in such diagrams are labeled by the orbital indices, the diagram structure adequately reflects the irreducible representation of the group U(R). In this sense the paper presents a unitary group approach to the natural generalization of the usual many‐body theory for the spin‐adapted cases. A set of very simple rules is derived; their similarity with the corresponding rules in the ordinary many‐body theory and practical utility are discussed in connection with (a) matrix elements over many‐electron spin states and (b) closed‐ and open‐shell many‐body perturbation theory. A possibility of integral‐driven many‐body perturbation theory for open‐shells is indicated. Connections of this formalism with others are also discussed.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jul 1, 1984•10 citations

The unitary-group formulation of coupled-cluster many-electron theory

F. A. Matsen

Coupled-cluster many-electron theory (CCMET) has been developed in the second-quantized formulation with and without spin projection. In this article CCMET is developed in the unitary-group formulation where the group is U(p) and p is the number of orbitals in the basis set. The zero-order ground state is the highest-weight state of an irreducibly invariant subspace of U(p) and the excitation operators are infinitesimal generators. These irreducible spaces are uniquely labeled by Young diagrams which the Pauli principle limits to no more than one column for fermion orbitals and no more than two columns for freeon (spin-free) orbitals. In the latter case the spin is one-half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. We employ both the Gel'fand and the generator bases for the irreducible invariant vector spaces. Matrix elements for the former are evaluated by techniques due to Gel'fand, Biedenharn, Louck, Paldus, and Shavitt and for the latter directly by Lie algebraic and diagrammatic techniques as a simple function of the weight components of the highest-weight state. For freeon or fermion orbitals the results are equivalent to those obtained by the second-quantized formulation with or without spin projection.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 18, 2009•0 citations

A spin‐dependent unitary group approach to many‐electron systems

M. D. Gould, Graham S. Chandler

Abstract In this article we derive a segment‐level formula for the matrix elements of the U(2n) generators in a basis symmetry adapted to the subgroup U(n) × U(2) (i.e., spin‐orbit basis), for the representations appropriate to many‐electron systems. This enables the direct evaluation of the matrix elements of spin‐dependent Hamiltonians.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Oct 1, 1984•38 citations
Abstract The fermion unitary group formulation (UGF) of many‐body theory is based on the unitary group U(2n) where n is the number of freeon orbitals. This formulation, which conserves particle‐number but not spin, is isomorphic to the particle‐number‐conserving, second‐quantized formulation (SQF). In UGF we derive the familiar diagrammatic algorithm for matrix elements, M(Y) = (−1)H+L where H and L denote the numbers of hole lines and loops in the diagram D(Y) of M(Y). The unitary group derivation is considerably simpler than is the conventional, second‐quantized derivation that employs time‐dependence, Wick's theorem, normal‐order, and contractions. In neither fermion UGF nor SQF is spin conserved. We carry out in UGF the spin‐projection (symmetry adaptation to SU(2)) of the fermion vectors and obtain with a spin‐free Hamiltonian the same matrix elements as with the freeon UGF (part 24 of this series). The fermion unitary group formulation for a spin‐free Hamiltonian should be regarded as an alternate path to spin‐free quantum chemistry.
Abstract The representation of an N‐electron Schrödinger Hamiltonian on an orthonormal, spin‐free (freon) orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second‐degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the orbital product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which provide base for irreducible represntations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian in this same basis. We retain as physical only those states characterized by tableaux with no more than two columns for which the spin labelling is one‐half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard, number‐conserving, second‐quantized, many‐body theory.
Abstract This paper lays the algebraic foundation of a unitary group approach to many‐body theory. We define a set of second quantized spin‐shift operators which are used to construct spin‐adapted many‐electron configuration functions. We investigate the particle‐hole transformation, normal ordering, and contraction of spin shifts. This gives an orbital Wick's theorem reflecting the permutational structure of the states spanning the irreducible representations of the spatial unitary group. We study the spinless Hamiltonian, and the relationship between spin shifts and unitary group generators.
Abstract This paper shows that the spin‐shift formalism developed in B. T. Pickup and A. Mukhopadhyay [Int. J. Quantum Chem. 26, 101 (1984)] supports a one‐component diagrammatics which has a systematics akin to that in the spin‐orbital many‐body theory. The diagrams are neither Goldstone nor Yutsis type, and characterize the chain U(2R) ⊃ U(R)⊗SU(2) on which the spin‐shift formalism is based. Accordingly, while the lines in such diagrams are labeled by the orbital indices, the diagram structure adequately reflects the irreducible representation of the group U(R). In this sense the paper presents a unitary group approach to the natural generalization of the usual many‐body theory for the spin‐adapted cases. A set of very simple rules is derived; their similarity with the corresponding rules in the ordinary many‐body theory and practical utility are discussed in connection with (a) matrix elements over many‐electron spin states and (b) closed‐ and open‐shell many‐body perturbation theory. A possibility of integral‐driven many‐body perturbation theory for open‐shells is indicated. Connections of this formalism with others are also discussed.
Coupled-cluster many-electron theory (CCMET) has been developed in the second-quantized formulation with and without spin projection. In this article CCMET is developed in the unitary-group formulation where the group is U(p) and p is the number of orbitals in the basis set. The zero-order ground state is the highest-weight state of an irreducibly invariant subspace of U(p) and the excitation operators are infinitesimal generators. These irreducible spaces are uniquely labeled by Young diagrams which the Pauli principle limits to no more than one column for fermion orbitals and no more than two columns for freeon (spin-free) orbitals. In the latter case the spin is one-half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. We employ both the Gel'fand and the generator bases for the irreducible invariant vector spaces. Matrix elements for the former are evaluated by techniques due to Gel'fand, Biedenharn, Louck, Paldus, and Shavitt and for the latter directly by Lie algebraic and diagrammatic techniques as a simple function of the weight components of the highest-weight state. For freeon or fermion orbitals the results are equivalent to those obtained by the second-quantized formulation with or without spin projection.