Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Mathematical Physics

A proposition-state structure

Vittorio Berzi, Antonio Zecca A

Published Jun 1, 1974• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01646609

Related papers

Proposition-State Structure and Idealized Measurements

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli, Peter Carruthers

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 28, 1984•0 citations

Ideal, first-kind measurements in a proposition-state structure

Gianni Cassinelli, Enrico G. Beltrametti

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1975•21 citations

States and Propositions of a Physical System

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli, Peter Carruthers

Yes-No Experiments The first five sections of this chapter are intended to provide some intuitive physical content to the notions of state and proposition of a quantum system. We deliberately avoid any deductive attitude, and we also avoid formalizations: the ingredients we shall start with (yes-no experiments and preparations) are so primitive and unstructured that the construction of quantum mechanics out of them is certainly not at hand. What we are going to see is simply that there is natural physical motivation for the occurrence at the very basis of every statistical theory—quantum mechanics in particular—of an ordered structure of propositions, of a convex structure of states, and of a relationship between these structures that makes the states behave as probability measures on propositions. From Section 13.6 on, we shall sketch a more formalized model, based on Mackey's approach. By a yes-no experiment is meant an experiment that makes use of a measuring instrument having just two outcomes, which without loss of generality we can agree to label “yes” and “no”. Of course, when talking of a yes-no experiment we always imagine that we have specified the physical system to which it pertains. We also imagine that the interaction between

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 28, 1984•0 citations

Effects and Propositions

William Demopoulos

arXiv:0809.0659•Foundations of Physics•Jun 9, 2009•11 citations

Probabilities in the logic of quantum propositions

Arkady Bolotin

In quantum logic, i.e., within the structure of the Hilbert lattice imposed on all closed linear subspaces of a Hilbert space, the assignment of truth values to quantum propositions (i.e., experimentally verifiable propositions relating to a quantum system) is unambiguously determined by the state of the system. So, if only pure states of the system are considered, can a probability measure mapping the probability space for truth values to the unit interval be assigned to quantum propositions? In other words, is a probability concept contingent or emergent in the logic of quantum propositions? Until this question is answered, the cause of probabilities in quantum theory cannot be completely understood. In the present paper it is shown that the interaction of the quantum system with its environment causes the irreducible randomness in the relation between quantum propositions and truth values.

arXiv:1812.01937•Dec 5, 2018•0 citations

States as Morphisms

Ferdinand Chovanec, Roman Frič

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 29, 2009•12 citations
Yes-No Experiments The first five sections of this chapter are intended to provide some intuitive physical content to the notions of state and proposition of a quantum system. We deliberately avoid any deductive attitude, and we also avoid formalizations: the ingredients we shall start with (yes-no experiments and preparations) are so primitive and unstructured that the construction of quantum mechanics out of them is certainly not at hand. What we are going to see is simply that there is natural physical motivation for the occurrence at the very basis of every statistical theory—quantum mechanics in particular—of an ordered structure of propositions, of a convex structure of states, and of a relationship between these structures that makes the states behave as probability measures on propositions. From Section 13.6 on, we shall sketch a more formalized model, based on Mackey's approach. By a yes-no experiment is meant an experiment that makes use of a measuring instrument having just two outcomes, which without loss of generality we can agree to label “yes” and “no”. Of course, when talking of a yes-no experiment we always imagine that we have specified the physical system to which it pertains. We also imagine that the interaction between
In quantum logic, i.e., within the structure of the Hilbert lattice imposed on all closed linear subspaces of a Hilbert space, the assignment of truth values to quantum propositions (i.e., experimentally verifiable propositions relating to a quantum system) is unambiguously determined by the state of the system. So, if only pure states of the system are considered, can a probability measure mapping the probability space for truth values to the unit interval be assigned to quantum propositions? In other words, is a probability concept contingent or emergent in the logic of quantum propositions? Until this question is answered, the cause of probabilities in quantum theory cannot be completely understood. In the present paper it is shown that the interaction of the quantum system with its environment causes the irreducible randomness in the relation between quantum propositions and truth values.