Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Three-beam interference and which-way information in neutron interferometry

Michael Zawisky, Matthias Baron, Rudolf Loidl

Published Dec 31, 2002• 14 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A two-loop perfect-crystal neutron interferometer was used for the quantitative determination of which-way (WW) information and the verification of the duality relation between predictability and visibility. Our interferometer has two remarkable features, it allows the absorption-free tuning of WW information and it enables the simultaneous measurement of the duality relation without changing the interferometer setup. In addition, the duality relation of three interfering beams is a good demonstration that WW information should not be misused as particle property because one interferometer beam remains in a coherent superposition of two path alternatives, which is not consistent with the particle picture. The coherent WW tuning was performed without changing the neutron's momentum and without dephasing.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.66.063608

Related papers

Coherence and Decoherence in Neutron Optics

Matthias Baron, Helmut Rauch, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov +3 more

Recent neutron interferometer experiments focused on coherence measurements and have shown that coherence features are determined by the beam preparation only. The wave function contains information about the particle and about the beam preparation simultaneously which signalizes the connection between quantum system and apparatus. Further experiments investigated the question of quantum decoherence and how a quantum system can evolve into a classical system. The experiments have been performed with a perfect crystal neutron interferometer at the high flux reactor of the Institut Laue‐Langevin in Grenoble. The distinction between dephasing and decoherence will be discussed.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Coherence and Decoherence in Neutron Optics

Matthias Baron, Helmut Rauch

Recent neutron interferometer experiments focused on coherence measurements and have shown that coherence features are determined by the beam preparation only. The wave function contains information about the particle and about the beam preparation simultaneously which signalizes the connection between quantum system and apparatus. Further experiments investigated the question of quantum decoherence and how a quantum system can evolve into a classical system. The experiments have been performed with a perfect crystal neutron interferometer at the high flux reactor of the Institut Laue‐Langevin in Grenoble. The distinction between dephasing and decoherence will be discussed.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•3 citations

Measurement and characterization of the three-dimensional coherence function in neutron interferometry

H. Rauch, H. Wölwitsch, Helmut Kaiser +2 more

The spatial coherence function in all three orthogonal directions has been measured by means of perfect crystal neutron interferometry. It has been demonstrated that the coherence function is given by the Fourier transform of the related momentum distribution, which in turn is determined by the collimation and monochromatization of the beam incident upon and traversing the interferometer. Thus, a measurement of the coherence function can replace a measurement of the momentum distribution in certain cases. Retrieval of the coherence can be accomplished by phase echo and/or postselection methods. A complete retrieval of the coherence is impossible in principle due to unavoidable loss factors.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1996•67 citations

Operational path-phase complementarity in single-photon interferometry

Noam Erez A, Daniel Jacobs, Gershon Kurizki

Abstract. We examine two setups that reveal different operational implications of path-phase complementarity for single photons in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). In both setups, the which-way (WW) information is recorded in the polarization state of the photon serving as a “flying which-way detector”. In the “predictive” variant, using a fixed initial state, one obtains duality relation between the probability to correctly predict the outcome of either a which-way (WW) or which-phase (WP) measurement (equivalent to the conventional path-distinguishibility-visibility). In this setup, only one or the other (WW or WP) prediction has operational meaning in a single experiment. In the second, “retrodictive ” protocol, the initial state is secretly selected for each photon by one party, Alice, among a set of initial states which may differ in the amplitudes and phases of the photon in each arm of the MZI. The goal of the other party, Bob, is to retrodict the initial state by measurements on the photon. Here, a similar duality relation between WP and WW probabilities, governs their simultaneous guesses in each experimental run.

•Nov 20, 2012•3 citations

Far-field interference of a neutron white beam and the applications to noninvasive phase-contrast imaging

Dmitry A. Pushin, Dusan Sarenac, Daniel Seth Hussey +10 more

The phenomenon of interference plays a crucial role in the field of precision measurement science. Wave-particle duality has expanded the well-known interference effects of electromagnetic waves to massive particles. The majority of the wave-particle interference experiments require a near monochromatic beam which limits its applications due to the resulting low intensity. Here we demonstrate white beam interference in the far-field regime using a two-phase-grating neutron interferometer and its application to phase-contrast imaging. The functionality of this interferometer is based on the universal moir\'e effect that allows us to improve upon the standard Lau setup. Interference fringes were observed with monochromatic and polychromatic neutron beams for both continuous and pulsed beams. Far-field neutron interferometry allows for the full utilization of intense neutron sources for precision measurements of gradient fields. It also overcomes the alignment, stability, and fabrication challenges associated with the more familiar perfect-crystal neutron interferometer, as well as avoids the loss of intensity due to the absorption analyzer grating requirement in Talbot-Lau interferometer.

arXiv:1606.03445•Physical Review A•Apr 26, 2017•41 citations

WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY IN MULTI-PATH INTERFEROMETERS: GENERAL CONCEPTS AND THREE-PATH INTERFEROMETERS

Berthold‐Georg Englert, Dagomir Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek +1 more

For two-path interferometers, the which-path predictability [Formula: see text] and the fringe visibility [Formula: see text] are familiar quantities that are much used to talk about wave-particle duality in a quantitative way. We discuss several candidates that suggest themselves as generalizations P of [Formula: see text] for multi-path interferometers, and treat the case of three paths in considerable detail. To each choice for the path knowledge P, the interference strength V — the corresponding generalization of [Formula: see text] — is found by a natural, operational procedure. In experimental terms, it amounts to finding those equal-weight superpositions of the path amplitudes which maximize P for the emerging intensities. Mathematically speaking, one needs to identify a certain optimum one among the Fourier transforms of the state of the interfering quantum object. Wave-particle duality is manifest, inasmuch as P = 1 implies V = 0 and V = 1 implies P = 0, whatever definition is chosen. The possible values of the pair (P,V) are restricted to an area with corners at (P,V) = (0,0), (P,V) = (1,0), and (P,V) = (0,1), with the shape of the border line from (1,0) to (0,1), depending on the particular choice for P and the induced definition of V.

arXiv:0710.0179•International Journal of Quantum Information•Feb 1, 2008•110 citations
A two-loop perfect-crystal neutron interferometer was used for the quantitative determination of which-way (WW) information and the verification of the duality relation between predictability and visibility. Our interferometer has two remarkable features, it allows the absorption-free tuning of WW information and it enables the simultaneous measurement of the duality relation without changing the interferometer setup. In addition, the duality relation of three interfering beams is a good demonstration that WW information should not be misused as particle property because one interferometer beam remains in a coherent superposition of two path alternatives, which is not consistent with the particle picture. The coherent WW tuning was performed without changing the neutron's momentum and without dephasing.
Recent neutron interferometer experiments focused on coherence measurements and have shown that coherence features are determined by the beam preparation only. The wave function contains information about the particle and about the beam preparation simultaneously which signalizes the connection between quantum system and apparatus. Further experiments investigated the question of quantum decoherence and how a quantum system can evolve into a classical system. The experiments have been performed with a perfect crystal neutron interferometer at the high flux reactor of the Institut Laue‐Langevin in Grenoble. The distinction between dephasing and decoherence will be discussed.
Recent neutron interferometer experiments focused on coherence measurements and have shown that coherence features are determined by the beam preparation only. The wave function contains information about the particle and about the beam preparation simultaneously which signalizes the connection between quantum system and apparatus. Further experiments investigated the question of quantum decoherence and how a quantum system can evolve into a classical system. The experiments have been performed with a perfect crystal neutron interferometer at the high flux reactor of the Institut Laue‐Langevin in Grenoble. The distinction between dephasing and decoherence will be discussed.
The spatial coherence function in all three orthogonal directions has been measured by means of perfect crystal neutron interferometry. It has been demonstrated that the coherence function is given by the Fourier transform of the related momentum distribution, which in turn is determined by the collimation and monochromatization of the beam incident upon and traversing the interferometer. Thus, a measurement of the coherence function can replace a measurement of the momentum distribution in certain cases. Retrieval of the coherence can be accomplished by phase echo and/or postselection methods. A complete retrieval of the coherence is impossible in principle due to unavoidable loss factors.
Abstract. We examine two setups that reveal different operational implications of path-phase complementarity for single photons in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). In both setups, the which-way (WW) information is recorded in the polarization state of the photon serving as a “flying which-way detector”. In the “predictive” variant, using a fixed initial state, one obtains duality relation between the probability to correctly predict the outcome of either a which-way (WW) or which-phase (WP) measurement (equivalent to the conventional path-distinguishibility-visibility). In this setup, only one or the other (WW or WP) prediction has operational meaning in a single experiment. In the second, “retrodictive ” protocol, the initial state is secretly selected for each photon by one party, Alice, among a set of initial states which may differ in the amplitudes and phases of the photon in each arm of the MZI. The goal of the other party, Bob, is to retrodict the initial state by measurements on the photon. Here, a similar duality relation between WP and WW probabilities, governs their simultaneous guesses in each experimental run.
The phenomenon of interference plays a crucial role in the field of precision measurement science. Wave-particle duality has expanded the well-known interference effects of electromagnetic waves to massive particles. The majority of the wave-particle interference experiments require a near monochromatic beam which limits its applications due to the resulting low intensity. Here we demonstrate white beam interference in the far-field regime using a two-phase-grating neutron interferometer and its application to phase-contrast imaging. The functionality of this interferometer is based on the universal moir\'e effect that allows us to improve upon the standard Lau setup. Interference fringes were observed with monochromatic and polychromatic neutron beams for both continuous and pulsed beams. Far-field neutron interferometry allows for the full utilization of intense neutron sources for precision measurements of gradient fields. It also overcomes the alignment, stability, and fabrication challenges associated with the more familiar perfect-crystal neutron interferometer, as well as avoids the loss of intensity due to the absorption analyzer grating requirement in Talbot-Lau interferometer.
For two-path interferometers, the which-path predictability [Formula: see text] and the fringe visibility [Formula: see text] are familiar quantities that are much used to talk about wave-particle duality in a quantitative way. We discuss several candidates that suggest themselves as generalizations P of [Formula: see text] for multi-path interferometers, and treat the case of three paths in considerable detail. To each choice for the path knowledge P, the interference strength V — the corresponding generalization of [Formula: see text] — is found by a natural, operational procedure. In experimental terms, it amounts to finding those equal-weight superpositions of the path amplitudes which maximize P for the emerging intensities. Mathematically speaking, one needs to identify a certain optimum one among the Fourier transforms of the state of the interfering quantum object. Wave-particle duality is manifest, inasmuch as P = 1 implies V = 0 and V = 1 implies P = 0, whatever definition is chosen. The possible values of the pair (P,V) are restricted to an area with corners at (P,V) = (0,0), (P,V) = (1,0), and (P,V) = (0,1), with the shape of the border line from (1,0) to (0,1), depending on the particular choice for P and the induced definition of V.