A uniform mathematical description of quantum automata as quantum finite automata, quantum linear bounded automata, and quantum Turing machines is introduced, and the existence of such automata under certain circumstances is investigated. Such quantum automata are modelled by isometric rather than unitary operators, reflecting the fact that computation is primarily irreversible in contrast to physical phenomena in the microworld. The global conditions determine the local conditions of the operators.
A uniform mathematical description of quantum automata as quantum finite automata, quantum linear bounded automata, and quantum Turing machines is introduced, and the existence of such automata under certain circumstances is investigated. Such quantum automata are modelled by isometric rather than unitary operators, reflecting the fact that computation is primarily irreversible in contrast to physical phenomena in the microworld. The global conditions determine the local conditions of the operators.
Quantum computing is concerned with computer technology based on the principles of quantum mechanics, with operations performed at the quantum level. Quantum computational models make it possible to analyze the resources required for computations. Quantum automata can be classified thusly: quantum finite automata, quantum sequential machine, quantum pushdown automata, quantum Turing machine and orthomodular lattice-valued automata. These models are useful for determining the expressive power and boundaries of various computational features. In light of the current state of quantum computation theory research, a systematic review of the literature seems timely. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive and systematic analysis of quantum finite automata models, quantum finite automata models with density operators and quantum finite automata models with classical states, interactive proof systems, quantum communication complexity and query complexity as described in the literature. The statistics of quantum finite automata related papers are shown and open problems are identified for more advanced research. The current status of quantum automata theory is distributed into various categories. This research work also highlights the previous research, current status and future directions of quantum automata models.
Quantum finite automata were introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Crutchfield in [MC 97] and by A.Kondacs and J.Watrous in [KW 97]. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata, but rather a generalization of deterministic reversible (permutation) automata. In [AF 98] A.Ambainis and R.Freivalds raised the question what kind of probabilistic automata can be viewed as a special case of quantum finite automata. To answer that question and study relationship between quantum finite automata and probabilistic finite automata, we introduce a notion of probabilistic reversible automata (PRA, or doubly stochastic automata). We give the necessary condition for a language to be recognized by PRA. We find that there is a strong relationship between different possible models of PRA and corresponding models of quantum finite automata. In these thesis we regard quantum automata, probabilistic reversible and deterministic reversible automata as reversible automata. At least two non-equivalent definitions of language recognition are used for one-way reversible finite automata in various papers. Both of these definitions have their own advantages and disadvantages, summarized in our classification of one-way reversible automata. Further, we introduce a notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite multitape automaton but not by deterministic finite multitape automata. Additionally we discover unexpected probabilistic automata recognizing complicated languages. Finally, we revise the concept of quantum pushdown automata (QPA), first introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Cruthchfield in [MC 97]. We give the definition of QPA in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by using the definition of quantum finite automata of [KW 97]. It is established that the unitary criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the corresponding unitary criteria of quantum Turing machines [BV 97]. We show that QPA can recognize every regular language. We also present some simple non-context-free languages recognized by QPA (hence not recognizable by deterministic and nondeterministic pushdown automata).
Since Richard Feynman introduced the notion of quantum computation in 1982, various models of "quantum computers" have been proposed (R. Feynman, 1992). These models include quantum Turing machines and quantum circuits. We define another quantum computational model, one dimensional quantum cellular automata, and demonstrate that any quantum Turing machine can be efficiently simulated by a one dimensional quantum cellular automaton with constant slowdown. This can be accomplished by consideration of a restricted class of one dimensional quantum cellular automata called one dimensional partitioned quantum cellular automata. We also show that any one dimensional partitioned quantum cellular automaton can be simulated by a quantum Turing machine with linear slowdown, but the problem of efficiently simulating an arbitrary one dimensional quantum cellular automaton with a quantum Turing machine is left open. From this discussion, some interesting facts concerning these models are easily deduced.
Lots of efforts in the last decades have been done to prove or disprove whether the set of polynomially bounded problems is equal to the set of polynomially verifiable problems. This paper will present an overview of the current beliefs of quantum complexity theorists and discussion detail the impacts these beliefs may have on the future of the field. We introduce a new form of Turing machine based on the concepts of quantum mechanics and investigate the domain of this novel definition for computation. The main object is to show the domain of these computation machines and the new definition of algorithms using these automata. In section one we give a brief fundamental overview of classical complexity theory, Turing machine and all the fundamental concepts required for the next chapters. In section two we describe various classes of classical complexity automata. In next chapter we introduce quantum complexity featuring quantum Turing machines and discuss its relationship to classical complexity. Section four presents a relationship between quantum complexity classes based on the quantum Turing machines and quantum oracles, and their relationship with corresponding classical complexity classes. And section five presents a discussion on the practical phenomena in problem solving using quantum computers. Finally in section five we speculate briefly on the direction we believe the field to be headed, and what might reasonably be expected in the future
Herein we survey the main results concerning quantum automata and machines with classical control. These machines were originally proposed by Sernadas et al in [37], during the FCT QuantLog project. First, we focus on the expressivity of quantum automata with both quantum and classical states. We revise the result obtained in [32] where it was proved that such automata are able to recognise, with exponentially less states than deterministic finite automata, a family of regular languages that cannot be recognised by other types of quantum automata. Finally, we revise the concept of quantum Turing machine with classical control introduced in [25]. The novelty of these machines consists in the fact that their termination problem is completely deterministic, in opposition to other notions in the literature. Concretely, we revisit the result that such machines fulfil the s-m-n property, while keeping the expressivity of a quantum model for computation.
In the contemporary era we dwell in, every now and then, new technologies are developed by master brains such as researchers and scientists. This also paves the way to discover replacements to classical computers. One such progression among the great inventions is the essence of quantum computing. They are brought to light for the purpose of solving problems and scenarios solved by classical computers but in a more effective way and in the least span of time. The study of quantum computing focuses on finding new ways to compute by using quantum physics phenomena. A qubit, in contrast to a typical computer bit, can be either 0 or 1, or it can be a superposition of both 0 and 1. Quantum theory commemorates with automata theory, thereby formulating quantum finite automata. Quantum finite automaton, or basically a deterministic finite automaton, is one of the simplest models of computation, which is an input-driven model, which takes an input, and according to the input, we just read the machine, and it changes its state. This proves that any quantum finite automata are completely capable of recognizing languages like Tally with given cut point too. Such languages recognized by a cut point, by quantum finite automata, are called stochastic languages. It further collaborates with the chemical industry with its qubit power over molecular collide, interactive models, and collaborative string processing using nonregular languages.