Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

中国邮电高校学报：英文版

Joint power allocation and relay selection for decode-and-forward cooperative relay in secure communication

Yunchuan Yang, Hui Zhao, Cong Sun, Wenbo Wang

Published Apr 1, 2013• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s1005-8885(13)60032-1

Related papers

Joint Relay Selection and Destination Assisted Cooperative Jamming with Power Allocation for Secure DF Relay Network

Shaobo Jia, Jiayan Zhang, Honglin Zhao +1 more

International Journal of Wireless Information Networks•Jul 9, 2019•2 citations

Joint Time Switching and Power Allocation for Secure Multicarrier Decode-and-Forward Relay Systems with Wireless Information and Power Transfer

Xiancai Chen, Gaofei Huang, Yuan Guai Lin +2 more

Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering•Sep 30, 2017•0 citations

Cooperative Relaying Protocol for Improving Physical Layer Security in Wireless Decode-and-Forward Relaying Networks

Jong-Ho Lee

Wireless Personal Communications•Apr 16, 2015•10 citations

Joint Cooperative Beamforming and Jamming for Physical-Layer Security of Decode-and-Forward Relay Networks

Haiyan Guo, Zhen Yang, Linghua Zhang +2 more

This paper proposes a new joint cooperative beamforming and jamming (JCBJ) scheme for improving the physical layer security of decode-and-forward wireless networks where a source node transmits to its destination with the aid of multiple intermediate nodes in the presence of an eavesdropper. In the proposed JCBJ scheme, we select the intermediate nodes succeeding in source decoding as the relays to forward the source transmission simultaneously by employing a beamforming weight vector, and meanwhile, use the remaining ones as the friendly jammers to disturb the eavesdropper by sending artificial noise. In order to achieve the secrecy rate maximum, we further study on the power allocation among the source, relays, and jammers under two assumptions of the wiretap link's channel state information. We derive the closed-form optimal solutions by first allocating the transmit power at the source within different ranges to consider all the possible relay selection schemes in which different numbers of relays are employed, and then transforming the multivariable power allocation problem to a set of single-variable optimization subproblems. Our numerical results show the superiority of the proposed JCBJ scheme and the proposed power allocation strategies.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2017•36 citations

Enhanced Physical Layer Security for Cooperative NOMA Network with Hybrid-Decode-Amplify-Forward Relaying via Power Allocation Assisted Control Jamming

V. Narasimha Nayak, Kiran Kumar Gurrala

Wireless Personal Communications•Jul 10, 2021•6 citations

Secure energy efficiency of selective decode and forward with distributed power allocation

Jamil Farhat, Glauber Gomes de Oliveira Brante, Richard Demo Souza +1 more

We investigate the secure energy efficiency of a cooperative network where two legitimate users (Alice and Bob) communicate with the help of a relay node, in the presence of a passive eavesdropper (Eve). Power is adequately allocated between Alice and the relay using a Dinkelbach-based iterative power allocation algorithm. We assume channel state information of the legitimate channel only and compare the secure energy efficiency of several cooperative schemes, namely, selective decode-and-forward (SDF), fixed decode-and-forward (DF), amplify-and-forward (AF) and cooperative jamming (CJ). Our results show that, in terms of secure energy efficiency, SDF outperforms the other cooperative schemes in many scenarios. However, when the transmit rate increases or when Eve is close to the legitimate nodes, CJ stands out as the most advantageous scheme.

International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems•Aug 1, 2015•6 citations
This paper proposes a new joint cooperative beamforming and jamming (JCBJ) scheme for improving the physical layer security of decode-and-forward wireless networks where a source node transmits to its destination with the aid of multiple intermediate nodes in the presence of an eavesdropper. In the proposed JCBJ scheme, we select the intermediate nodes succeeding in source decoding as the relays to forward the source transmission simultaneously by employing a beamforming weight vector, and meanwhile, use the remaining ones as the friendly jammers to disturb the eavesdropper by sending artificial noise. In order to achieve the secrecy rate maximum, we further study on the power allocation among the source, relays, and jammers under two assumptions of the wiretap link's channel state information. We derive the closed-form optimal solutions by first allocating the transmit power at the source within different ranges to consider all the possible relay selection schemes in which different numbers of relays are employed, and then transforming the multivariable power allocation problem to a set of single-variable optimization subproblems. Our numerical results show the superiority of the proposed JCBJ scheme and the proposed power allocation strategies.
We investigate the secure energy efficiency of a cooperative network where two legitimate users (Alice and Bob) communicate with the help of a relay node, in the presence of a passive eavesdropper (Eve). Power is adequately allocated between Alice and the relay using a Dinkelbach-based iterative power allocation algorithm. We assume channel state information of the legitimate channel only and compare the secure energy efficiency of several cooperative schemes, namely, selective decode-and-forward (SDF), fixed decode-and-forward (DF), amplify-and-forward (AF) and cooperative jamming (CJ). Our results show that, in terms of secure energy efficiency, SDF outperforms the other cooperative schemes in many scenarios. However, when the transmit rate increases or when Eve is close to the legitimate nodes, CJ stands out as the most advantageous scheme.