Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mean Field Theory for Interacting Spin-1 Bosons on a Lattice

Ramesh V. Pai, K. Sheshadri, Rahul Anil Pandit

Published Dec 1, 2006• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812772510_0008

Related papers

Quantum Search With Interacting Bosons on a Lattice: Mean-Field Theory and Many-Body Simulations of Quantum Walk Algorithms

Benjamin Douglas Dalfavero

•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Critical Properties of Strongly Interacting Bosons on a Lattice

G. G. Batrouni

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Insulator-superfluid transition of spin-1 bosons in an optical lattice in magnetic field

Anatoly A. Svidzinsky, S. T. Chui

We study the insulator-superfluid transition of spin-1 bosons in an optical lattice in a uniform magnetic field. Based on a mean-field approximation we obtained a zero-temperature phase diagram. We found that depending on the particle number the transition for bosons with antiferromagnetic interaction may occur into different polar superfluid phases with spins aligned along or opposite to the field direction. This is qualitatively different from the field-free transition for which the mean-field theory predicts a unique polar superfluid state for any particle number.

arXiv:cond-mat/0305513•Physical Review A•Oct 10, 2003•24 citations

Why the Schwinger boson mean field theory fails to describe the spin dynamics of the triangular lattice antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model?

Qiu Zhang, Tao Li

We find that the Schwinger boson mean field theory (SBMFT) supplemented with Gutzwiller projection provides an exceedingly accurate description for the ground state of the spin-12triangular lattice antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model (spin-12TLHAF). However, we find the SBMFT fails even qualitatively in the description of the dynamical behavior of the system. In particular, the SBMFT fails to predict the Goldstone mode in the magnetic ordered phase. We show that the coherent peak in the two-spinon continuum in the presence of spinon condensate should not be interpreted as a magnon mode. The SBMFT also predicts incorrectly a gapless longitudinal spin fluctuation mode in the magnetic ordered phase. We show that these failures are related to the following facts: (1) spinon condensation fails to provide a consistent description of the order parameter manifold of the 120 degree ordered phase. (2) There lacks in the SBMFT the coupling between the uncondensed spinon and the spinon condensate, which breaks both the spin rotational and the translational symmetry. (3) There lacks in the SBMFT the rigidity that is related to the no double occupancy constraint on the spinon system. We show that such failures of the SBMFT is neither restricted to the spin-12TLHAF nor to the magnetic ordered phase. We proposed a generalized SBMFT to resolve the first two issues and a new formalism to address the third issue.

arXiv:2103.03484•Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Jun 28, 2021•7 citations

Dynamical Mean-Field Theory for Bosons and Bose-Fermi Mixtures

Peter Anders

•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

Strongly interacting lattice bosons in disorder potential: a strong coupling approach

Chien-Hung Lin, Rajdeep Sensarma, K. Sengupta +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Feb 27, 2012•0 citations
We study the insulator-superfluid transition of spin-1 bosons in an optical lattice in a uniform magnetic field. Based on a mean-field approximation we obtained a zero-temperature phase diagram. We found that depending on the particle number the transition for bosons with antiferromagnetic interaction may occur into different polar superfluid phases with spins aligned along or opposite to the field direction. This is qualitatively different from the field-free transition for which the mean-field theory predicts a unique polar superfluid state for any particle number.
We find that the Schwinger boson mean field theory (SBMFT) supplemented with Gutzwiller projection provides an exceedingly accurate description for the ground state of the spin-12triangular lattice antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model (spin-12TLHAF). However, we find the SBMFT fails even qualitatively in the description of the dynamical behavior of the system. In particular, the SBMFT fails to predict the Goldstone mode in the magnetic ordered phase. We show that the coherent peak in the two-spinon continuum in the presence of spinon condensate should not be interpreted as a magnon mode. The SBMFT also predicts incorrectly a gapless longitudinal spin fluctuation mode in the magnetic ordered phase. We show that these failures are related to the following facts: (1) spinon condensation fails to provide a consistent description of the order parameter manifold of the 120 degree ordered phase. (2) There lacks in the SBMFT the coupling between the uncondensed spinon and the spinon condensate, which breaks both the spin rotational and the translational symmetry. (3) There lacks in the SBMFT the rigidity that is related to the no double occupancy constraint on the spinon system. We show that such failures of the SBMFT is neither restricted to the spin-12TLHAF nor to the magnetic ordered phase. We proposed a generalized SBMFT to resolve the first two issues and a new formalism to address the third issue.